Am I reading someone rallying against alleged censorship of reviews when there's evidence of frivolous reviews? If you want to argue for the sanctify of review aggregators they you should also be for them taking steps against bad faith reviews both positive and negative.
Resident Cosplay Progressive
Review bombers aren't voting 3-4-5... they are voting 1, maybe 2 if they want to be sneaky.
There's no reason to purge 5 and below... well, except you know. Manipulation of numbers.
Anyone paying attention to any of the media hysteria around this show knows there would be a lot of 1's from haters, but you also knew there would be lots of 10's from defenders.
Then again, review numbers are just straight up useless because of the disingenuous voters on each side as well as the disingenuous manipulation. So...shrug..
Mostly just fun to see the fallout on how people behave to justify why their numbers are wrong or correct.
Error 404 - Signature not found
I think it’s important to realize that about 99% of people watching this show do not discuss it on a forum, nor vote on review sites. There is a selection bias for both that favours the biggest fans and haters.
This means that both 1’s and 10’s on review sites do make sense, though they are both quite ridiculous. It just means review sites do not display the real population.
Don't be stupid. Of course it happens, and it happens as often as people brigading 1's.
There exists groups of people who blindly champion a product and give it 10/10 for the sake of boosting its rating just as there are those who put 1's to bring it down. And you even bring up a strong example of that with WoT.
As someone summed it up nicely above, most people who watch don't even bother reviewing. Fans and haters are much more likely to care enough to give a review than the average casual watcher. And shows with large fandoms and shows that have something controversial tend to have their reviews swayed by both tribes.
Last edited by Triceron; 2022-09-03 at 06:16 AM.
I don't understand why people think user reviews are a fine metric to see how good a show is. (As in ever)
So here's mine:
Visuals are amazing and approaching the LotR movies. Way better then the Hobbit.
Dwarves look awesome so far.
Short hair elves are weird at first glance but not a deal breaker. Probably their hair grows incredibly slow.
Pacing is off, like a lot.
Don't like Galadriel but can't tell you why.
So after two episodes I'd say 7/10
And the stranger has to be Sauron or Morgoth/Melkor.
Would be way too early for an Istari.
All female Elves would fight at times of need. It's typically the male Elves who would go forth to fight in other lands but "canonically" Galadriel tends towards masculine roles like wishing to rule and athleticism as well as being described as Amazon. Tolkien never explicitly wrote of her going out to fight but the story of the Second Age was due a rewrite to fit in her later characterisation and showing her as a warrior has some support from his notes and letters.
They needed to add events to show it (probably due to licensing) but they really nailed her reasons for refusing to return to Aman despite longing to dwell there again. I also liked the little but if tension between her and Gil-galad where he carries more authority but everyone knows she carries more wisdom and is (again canonically) the greatest of the Elves living in Middle-earth.
- - - Updated - - -
Tolkien was considering placing the Blue Wizards in the Second Age when he got around to rewriting the Silmarillion so it could be one of those. If it's Gandalf I would be very disappointed.
They not only disabled ratings, each „review“ will now be „reviewed“ to filter „bad faith“ ratings out.
wow, curious how amazon determines what bad faith is
![]()
Last edited by Universalgirl; 2022-09-03 at 06:44 AM.
I think it's a combination of the awkward dialogue and how they're framing her as a misunderstood outcast without like...really anything that would be necessary to establish that. Maybe it would work better if there had been more with Gil Galad and the implication that the other elves are uncomfortable around her because she might be harboring that dangerous darkness.
The stranger must be one of the blue wizards. Tolkien revisioned the coming of the Wizards and put the two blue ones in the 2nd age. Since the show kind of compressed the time a lot to make it easier for viewers (and them selves lol) a blue wizard would be both cool, fun and lore-wise okey!
For me the show is a clear 10/10 so far though, I have been waiting for 2nd age on screen and as a huge Tolkien nerd I've known for 19 years they'd have to make huge changes, time compressions and fill out hell a lot of blanks to make it a movie or show.. Not sure why so many people have a hard time with that.
Tiny bits of "They should have done this or that" but I was 99.9% into it. I didn't feel the pacing was of at all, neither did my wife or brother+GF.
The only hair I kind of felt like "Lmao GEn Z Represent!" was Finrod. But he was such a handsome badass mofo with the best chin I've seen so it was ok![]()
It seems it’s not about „Review Bombing“ it’s about filtering out Reviews that are not in line with Amazon Studios Ideology.
Ok so from now all reviews get reviewed.
Approve most 10/10
Disapprove 90% below 6
Leave 10% to look authentic.
Dude it’s not about a honest attempt to filter trolls out. It’s about showing positive reviews even if majority disagrees.
Who decides what’s bad faith?
You can now label all bad faith to push rating’s.
Is 10/10 rating with expressing that black elves feels not tolkien bad faith?
Last edited by Universalgirl; 2022-09-03 at 07:14 AM.
Even if that's true, why do you care so much? Is your life on the line or something?
Do you want this "woke" show to fail, even if it isn't as bad as your favorite youtubers predicted?
- - - Updated - - -
I saw some of those 1/10 user reviews and most of them were toxic as hell, with lots of racial slur. If they would only moderate 1/10 reviews those neckbeards would vote 2/10 and so on.