Lord of the Rings TV Series Purchased by Amazon

[Askyl]

Rings of Power must be the biggest proof yet Ragebait campagns on YouTube and Facebook is solid gold for content creators.

They literally made a bunch of people pretend to be fans of Tolkien and defend Tolkiens "honor" and review bomb the shit out of it.

Hilarious.

Its no way near perfect. But it is quite beautiful and it will be a fun adaptation. I do think they would have gone of better with dropping the entire season, or maybe in 2 parts like they did stranger things. So far I love everything except Galadriel, feel like they made her a bit Gen Z-ish. Hopefully she will grow. Still decent.


Hopefully the show is successful to the point Tolkien Estate reconcider their tight grip on Silmarillion and the Lost tales rights.

A 1st age trilogy is the dream.

[tikcol]

Rings of Power must be the biggest proof yet Ragebait campagns on YouTube and Facebook is solid gold for content creators.

They literally made a bunch of people pretend to be fans of Tolkien and defend Tolkiens "honor" and review bomb the shit out of it.

Hilarious.

Its no way near perfect. But it is quite beautiful and it will be a fun adaptation. I do think they would have gone of better with dropping the entire season, or maybe in 2 parts like they did stranger things. So far I love everything except Galadriel, feel like they made her a bit Gen Z-ish. Hopefully she will grow. Still decent.


Hopefully the show is successful to the point Tolkien Estate reconcider their tight grip on Silmarillion and the Lost tales rights.

A 1st age trilogy is the dream.

One could argue that the author of one of the best-selling book series of all time, translated into 50 different languages would have, in fact, a lot of fans.

This narrative on the other hand that people that give it low scores are trolls though, doesn't hold up to scrutiny very well when you put a meager amount of thought into it.

Sometimes the simplest answer is the right one. In this case and to put it bluntly, the show is just bad. There's no conspiracy.

[Dhrizzle]

So now that's he's dead you get to pick and choose and change what was written because he kept changing things up until his death? That's not very honest.

Erm, no? Because he expressed a desire to create a mythos with gaps for others to fill it's okay to fill those gaps, and as much of that mythos was in flux it isn't bad to interpret it in other ways.

It is an origin story in the sense that's we're getting glimpses of the the Hobbit philosophy in the 3rd age of not getting involved with the "outside world" and that adventures are non-sense.

We're also not seeing the origin of that, not getting involved is already part of their ethos and it matches what little we do know of the ancestral Hobbits. An origin would be showing them before they started avoiding other peoples and the events that made them change.

That's what you just made up. It's a very skewed interpretation of the quote to fit this whole narrative of yours and you know it.

No, that's the very clear impression you get if you read the whole letter instead of cherry-picking a few quotes from it.

Besides.. he did put a lot of time perfecting what is written. Be it published or not. If you do not want to view it that way then that's your problem.

It's a pretty common consensus that he was nowhere near perfecting the broader history of Arda. His notes show that vast swathes of what was released as the Silmarillion would have to be rewritten, not least because he wanted Arda to be round from the beginning with the Sun and Moon always existing.

RoP is not representing Tolkien's work, characters or events. So no, it isn't for fans of Tolkien.

Well it is so it is.

[tikcol]

Erm, no? Because he expressed a desire to create a mythos with gaps for others to fill it's okay to fill those gaps, and as much of that mythos was in flux it isn't bad to interpret it in other ways.



We're also not seeing the origin of that, not getting involved is already part of their ethos and it matches what little we do know of the ancestral Hobbits. An origin would be showing them before they started avoiding other peoples and the events that made them change.



No, that's the very clear impression you get if you read the whole letter instead of cherry-picking a few quotes from it.



It's a pretty common consensus that he was nowhere near perfecting the broader history of Arda. His notes show that vast swathes of what was released as the Silmarillion would have to be rewritten, not least because he wanted Arda to be round from the beginning with the Sun and Moon always existing.



Well it is so it is.

There's a difference between filling the gap in your own mind while reading his scripts than creating a story of your own with those gaps and spreading it throughout the world.

No, that's the very clear impression you get if you read the whole letter instead of cherry-picking a few quotes from it.

I challenge you to produce a single quote that would prove this. You can keep spinning this but it's just a lie.

It's a pretty common consensus that he was nowhere near perfecting the broader history of Arda. His notes show that vast swathes of what was released as the Silmarillion would have to be rewritten, not least because he wanted Arda to be round from the beginning with the Sun and Moon always existing.

He might not have perfected it. But your argument was about effort. He put a lot of decades into what was already written when he died. You just don't want to respect that. That's on you. You don't get to write the story he never wrote. Well, RoP does and that's the problem.

Well it is so it is.

The show just isn't bringing to life events or characters as written, your argument doesn't hold to scrutiny when it's blatantly obvious the amount of changes they're making not only to the storyline, events, timeline but also characters.

I understand that they need to condense the timelime, it's reasonable. They're not doing that though, they're completely re-writing the order of events and how they play out

[s_bushido]

I knew it was going to happen, but Isildur even still felt out of left field with Numenor still kicking. It's disappointing that racists and sexists completely drowned out legitimate criticism of the timeline. I feel like if the community had been more focused, they may have taken some of it into consideration. Probably not, but one can dream.

Eh? Based solely on the few wikis I found, Isildur would have been an adult (and ready to rule in his own right) by the time Numenor fell. I'm not sure what you think is "out of left field" about his inclusion in this.

[BeepBoo]

Isn't the time between the rings being forged and the ring getting axed off sauron's finger like... a thousand years or something? numenoreans live a long time, but not THAT long.

Research shows... yeah.. ring made in SA 1600. Ring lopped off in SA 3400....

Amazon wut is u doin? Show is aight so far, but stop trying to leave token (tolkien?) references for fans where they don't belong.
We know the rings aren't made yet. Meaning this is pre 1600. We know numenor fell in ~3300.

[s_bushido]

One of the first things we learned about the series was that they'd be compressing the timeline of the 2nd age... These aren't "token" references, they're intentional changes to tell a story that isn't unnecessarily broken up by decades/centuries.

[BeepBoo]

One of the first things we learned about the series was that they'd be compressing the timeline of the 2nd age... These aren't "token" references, they're intentional changes to tell a story that isn't unnecessarily broken up by decades/centuries.

"We knew they were going to completely gut the timeline to make it more convenient for film" isn't exactly a defense against the criticism that his appearance is out of left field, because it is. It's either a huge rewrite of the timeline or a huge rewrite of numenorean lifespan. I suppose it could also be them just telling multiple stories in tandem from different parts of the timeline, but that's bad story telling IMO and certainly enough evidence for saying he felt out of place and out of left-field.

[rhorle]

"We knew they were going to completely gut the timeline to make it more convenient for film" isn't exactly a defense against the criticism that his appearance is out of left field, because it is. It's either a huge rewrite of the timeline or a huge rewrite of numenorean lifespan. I suppose it could also be them just telling multiple stories in tandem from different parts of the timeline, but that's bad story telling IMO.

They are saying that it isn't "out of left field" because Amazon made clear they were changing the time line. It isn't a defense but merely an explanation of their decision.

In the novels, the aforementioned things take place over thousands of years, but Payne and McKay have compressed events into a single point in time. It is their biggest deviation from the text, and they know it’s a big swing. “We talked with the Tolkien estate,” says Payne. “If you are true to the exact letter of the law, you are going to be telling a story in which your human characters are dying off every season because you’re jumping 200 years in time, and then you’re not meeting really big, important canon characters until season four. Look, there might be some fans who want us to do a documentary of Middle-earth, but we’re going to tell one story that unites all these things.” https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood...ies-first-look

[s_bushido]

Considering that they told us that they'd be doing this before we'd even seen much/any footage, whining that they followed through on their stated plan is ridiculous.

And they demonstrated exactly why they did this in the story itself: Durin was upset that he'd essentially lived a lifetime since his friend bothered to check in on him. But for his immortal friend, even that amount of time might as well have been a long weekend... So they showrunners decided to change the timeline in order to tell a story featuring both mortals and immortal elves without having to have a rotating cast of throwaway humans/dwarves to demonstrate the passage of time. It's pretty basic shit.

[Triceron]

One of the first things we learned about the series was that they'd be compressing the timeline of the 2nd age... These aren't "token" references, they're intentional changes to tell a story that isn't unnecessarily broken up by decades/centuries.

Just because we knew they planned to do it doesn't excuse them of doing it though. It rubs off as being inauthentic, and frankly, makes a mess of the established fiction rather enhancing what is already there.

[BeepBoo]

They are saying that it isn't "out of left field" because Amazon made clear they were changing the time line. It isn't a defense but merely an explanation of their decision.

Not everyone follows whatever garbage amazon puts forth in some press conference or article, so just because they say that doesn't mean it isn't shocking to a bunch of people who are just watching the show and only paying attention that much.

Also, that's fucking weaksauce on their part. "We want people to have longevity with characters (and more so we probably don't want to have to constantly find new talent as their characters die and new ones come on-board)"

No. Fuck u. Game of thrones proved it was fine to have characters enter and drop like flies on a dime.

It's pretty basic shit.

I don't really care what's inconvenient for the largest budget show ever made. They can find more humans to be more authentic, or they can just stick to telling a story within the confines of the timeframe that won't necessitate that type of enormous change. OR they can do what they did and catch shit about it as more people watch it without any context of what amazon already admitted they were bastardizing. Doesn't make all those people wrong for feeling like something was out of place compared to what they know.

[Triceron]

They are saying that it isn't "out of left field" because Amazon made clear they were changing the time line. It isn't a defense but merely an explanation of their decision.

I mean, their entire explanation justifies the criticism that they shouldn't have picked this section of the appendices to focus on in the first place. It literally spans more than a 1000 years, and they hope to compress it into what? Mere years, if even a decade?

It probably would have been better to just tell their own tale within a fixed part of the timeline.

[rhorle]

Game of thrones proved it was fine to have characters enter and drop like flies on a dime.

And yet a criticism of House of the Dragons is that the young actors are being replaced because there are time skips and just a lot happening "off screen" because of those skips. Could Amazon have done it better? Maybe but there are real downsides to having a lot of time skips.

[Triceron]

People bitch and moan about how poorly written this all is, and how poorly acted it all is, but they still seem to simply not get basic things. How long was wasted talking about the first 15 or so minutes (because that's all one guy has actually seen, but still...) when it was all incredibly blatant in what it was portraying and what the character's motivations were? Or taking Galadriel starting to swim and just assuming she knew she could swim however many miles it would have been, no thought given to the simple answer of "she's swimming because its better for her to move and hope to be rescued or reach any small bit of land than just stay there floating and doing fuck all, waiting to get eaten."

No, it's better to not put her in the smack dab in the middle of the ocean with her being there because of her own choice to jump off the boat at the worst possible time and be put in a position that needlessly risks her life in the first place.

Trying to make sense of an unreasonable situation is equally as unreasonable. Your answer is akin to trying to defend the village idiot drinking paint again by chastising everyone for not understanding that he was 'really thirsty'.

[BeepBoo]

And yet a criticism of House of the Dragons is that the young actors are being replaced because there are time skips and just a lot happening "off screen" because of those skips. Could Amazon have done it better? Maybe but there are real downsides to having a lot of time skips.

Then just don't do time skips. Tell actual stories that aren't massive eons long plots of immense grandeur. They'd also have an easier time shoehoring their own stuff into the lore because tolkein rarely goes down to that level of granularity as far as events go.

Also, I'd like to see the number of complaints of actors rotating in HoD vs the number of complaints about timeline inaccuracies. I know there will be people upset oon both sides, but I'm a fan of things being made for IP's original fan-bases. The ones that even made them popular in the first place; NOT trying to go for a new audience. I'd wager the people complaining about HoD rotating cast are all short-attention-spanned tiktok scrollers who haven't read the books nor care about lore minutia and are just watching because it's the newest big thing off HBO.

Basic shit to tell a story. Seriously, dude.

Spoken like someone who is expecting the show to be for people wholly unfamiliar with tolkein lore and ALSO acting like it's the only way they could have exposed us to those things.

[BeepBoo]

More spoken like someone that understands how telling a story works lol This is how they chose to do it. The end result is the same. Some people would have complained no matter how they did it.

Not all complaints are as weighty as others. Complaints about someone doing something WILDLY outside of the known physical capabilities of the race (like swimming for hours) seem pretty on-point, though. Also, you act like every show has mass amounts of criticism about every single part/scene/minute of the show regardless of how things get done and that's just not true.

[Triceron]

Your answer is akin to "just don't do that 4head."

She had to jump into the water so that she could be picked up, show us what people are like with elves, then reduce the survivors to the main character and the obvious (currently) support character that'll move with the story, building a rapport between them.

Basic shit to tell a story. Seriously, dude.

To say she had to jump into the water for X and Y to happen really doesn't make sense because I can tell you easily that X and Y could easily be established without putting her in mortal danger. Look at Arondil's arc and how they already established how people are like with Elves.


"She had to" because the writers wanted a way to put her closer to Numenor, that's pretty much it.

Basic shit to tell a story that should have not been told in the first place. If you really break it down the story so far, it's a sequence of events that all lend to having Galadriel be at Numenor in order to progress the plot where she finds out more information about Sauron's plans.

And for that to happen, we have things like:

Gil-galad sending some of his best commanders back to Valinor even though he knows that evil is growing in the world. Hell, he shouldn't even be able to grant this offer.
Galadriel accepting the gift even though she's been established as someone who would easily refuse such an offer, and continue her hunt. Which she absolutely does at the end of the first episode anyways.
Galadriel making an irrational decision to risk her life in the middle of the ocean, which could easily lead to her drowning if not for plot armor
Somehow a raft of Southlanders making it this far west, well past Numenor. Where exactly were they headed to? Valinor as well?
Galadriel being saved by the one dude who doesn't even care about her life, much less his own at this point
Having Elendil save them and actually take them to Numenor, even though it's established that they haven't brought an Elf to the kingdom in hundreds/thousands of years
Elendil watching over Galadriel, the one person who would let her into the Archives and excuse her trying to steal ships instead of doing his duty and putting her behind bars.

The entire plot is one of convenience. These aren't stories that are coming across as authentic. Someone was paid to create this story, and it's easy to see how unnatural the progression actually is when you have sequences of events laid out in this way. Someone deliberately wrote in these obstacles and resolutions in this manner, and expects the audience to believe it to be a natural sequence of events.

That's why people are calling it out for being badly written. It's not just in the minutia of dialogue, but the whole construction of the narrative. It's convoluted. And it's being paced out very slowly and oddly. The whole Sauron plan should have been revealed in the first episode so the audience actually knows what the story is about, but for whatever reason they chose to keep it a mystery and reveal this 3 episodes in, which is close to half-way through the first season. None of these choices actually make sense from a story-writing perspective.

[Dhrizzle]

There's a difference between filling the gap in your own mind while reading his scripts than creating a story of your own with those gaps and spreading it throughout the world.

When Tolkien said his Legendarium should leave scope for "other minds and hands, wielding paint and music and drama" he wasn't talking about people daydreaming and filling in the blanks.

I challenge you to produce a single quote that would prove this. You can keep spinning this but it's just a lie.

I'm not going to go cherry-picking after criticising you for doing that. Letter #210 is available for everyone to read (probably, somewhere) and see how Tolkien's frustrations come from the lack of respect for the carefully constructed and detailed work he put in to LotR.

He might not have perfected it. But your argument was about effort. He put a lot of decades into what was already written when he died. You just don't want to respect that. That's on you. You don't get to write the story he never wrote. Well, RoP does and that's the problem.

No my argument was about the effort put in to make a completed piece of work. Your argument was about him perfecting things. Switching gear to focus on effort rather than results is a terrible goalpost shift.

The show just isn't bringing to life events or characters as written, your argument doesn't hold to scrutiny when it's blatantly obvious the amount of changes they're making not only to the storyline, events, timeline but also characters.

I understand that they need to condense the timelime, it's reasonable. They're not doing that though, they're completely re-writing the order of events and how they play out

Except they are. It's clear to anyone who's read the Silmarillion (and perhaps selected other works) that this is Tolkien's world in the aftermath of the War of Wrath, and if you've read LotR then it's fun to anticipate how the characters and society will change throughout the series so they are ready to settle into the ones we see during the War of the Ring at the end of the Third Age. The timeline compression is certainly a huge challenge and I'm not sure they can manage it without losing some of the gravitas of events but the whole thing is absolutely dripping in love for Tolkien's work.

The most detrimental thing to the series seems to be the licensing, particularly the way they can't name specific Valar or reference specific events, but arguably those absences are most notable to people with enough knowledge to fill in the blanks and there are some nice Easter eggs in there.

[BeepBoo]

Did Tolkien ever elaborate on the intricacies of elven swimming capabilities? As a person/race that was able to go on a never-ending hunt for centuries, I'd imagine they have quite impressive levels of stamina. Perhaps you could enlighten me.

Elves are regarded as no more strong or physically capable than man. They're more dexterous with keener senses and stronger convictions, but not stronger or especially enduring. What centuries-long hunt are you talking about that they didn't also sleep, rest, and eat? Certainly you're not implying they went straight walking or running without any of those things?

This is your own invented exaggeration, not at all something I expressed.

Ah, so there might have existed a way they showed us these things that didn't garner the critique, the same way plenty of other things about the show haven't garnered any noteworthy critique. Cool. If you know that, why bother saying what you did? To highlight that there definitely would be a non-zero number of people who would be upset at something no matter how they chose to do it? But that doesn't matter. No one would pay any credence to something that is a rounding error of people, especially if it weren't based in any semblance of lore/fact.