
Tolkien establishes the capabilities of the Elves well before he shows them being outsmarted and incompetent. This gives them depth - that they are both highly skilled in capturing, but prone to having their weakness to wine exploited as well.
This doesn't exist in Rings of Power, and they don't establish the capabilities of the Elves at the Watchtower at all. At most you see one 'fight' scene where Arondir shows himself to be physically superior to a rude boy in a tavern, and that's it. Everything expected of the Elves is implied through an assumption of the show that people have watched Lord of the Rings and know how good they are at what they do. The show doesn't set this up at all for itself.
And where have I defended these points? You're making some egregious assumptions here that you think I'm somehow defending every point of Tolkien's work as being flawless or something? If I haven't said anything to defend those points, I would prefer you not jumping to that conclusion and putting words in my mouth.This shows the bias against the show when similar situations exist. Remember in the time period of the hobbit the elves thought Sauron was gone. It is how a large company of Orcs could show up on their doorstep unimpeded. Heck the "Watchful Peace" tolkien created even mirrors what is happening in the show. As garrisons there weren't kept up (the plague contributed as well). https://tolkiengateway.net/wiki/Calenardhon
I will address them on a case by case basis as I have above with explaining the Elves being outsmarted by Bilbo and allowing the Dwarves to escape. If I haven't talked about the large company of Orcs showing up impeded, then I'm not showing bias am I? You're just assuming something that I never even commented on.
The point is about establishing the Elves being capable before showing them fail. Without first establishing their power, if all we see is them constantly being undermined or failing, then that is how they will be portrayed forever in this series. Everything cool about the Elves is built on the assumption that people have watched the LOTR movies.Right. Why is that a bad thing? Why is it that the only time it can be "good writing" is when the elves don't fail? That is counter intuitive because always having one side succeed just because they are the good guys is actual bad writing. There is no reason why there can't be failure and why "bad guys" can't be superior in some situations. Even more so when Tolkien did it and the show is echoing that.
I'll say that I think your own bias that Elves are Capable is due to your own biases. Let's remember that you were the one who thought that Galadriel's team actually hit the Snow Troll, when they never actually landed ANY blows on the Snow Troll. I think if you actually watch the series over again, you'll see that Galadriel, Elrond and Arondir are the only ones who actually show off any real Elf skill, while every other Elf is shown to be incompetent or set up to fail.
Last edited by Triceron; 2022-09-19 at 06:31 PM.
Well, the name is rather accurate since she's basically written as what is popularly considered a 'toxic male' in the circle of these writers, but since she doesn't have dangly bits between her legs it makes it somehow empowering and acceptable for... reasons. I always think back and laugh at how the movie As Good As It Gets described this sort of female writing out years ago, and it became a mainstream reality:
“Society is endangered not by the great profligacy of a few, but by the laxity of morals amongst all.”
“It's not an endlessly expanding list of rights — the 'right' to education, the 'right' to health care, the 'right' to food and housing. That's not freedom, that's dependency. Those aren't rights, those are the rations of slavery — hay and a barn for human cattle.”
― Alexis de Tocqueville
We do see the orcs displaying competence on-screen after their off-screen antics. What you are wanting to be shown on-screen has nothing to do with competence anyways. As we don't need to watch an entire valley be torn up and destroyed just to understand that a group can do it. It is silly to even suggest that is a requirement of any story telling.
"Man is his own star. His acts are his angels, good or ill, While his fatal shadows walk silently beside him."-Rhyme of the Primeval Paradine AFC 54
You know a community is bad when moderators lock a thread because "...this isnt the place to talk about it either seeing as it will get trolled..."
once again showing you have zero knowledge of the source material and zero understanding of it even if you know about it, during the second age and the rise of Sauron to power, the orcs were nothing but a mindless rabble, that's why in almost all other media set in this universe they are described as such and are viewed with little threat at all.
it was during the war of the last alliance that Sauron realised this immense weakness, while his army of orcs was vastly superior in number to that of the elves and men, it was a flailing mess with no focus on a singular goal which meant that the well drilled and well armed forces from the west were able to overcome that numbers disadvantage with skill and training, which is why in the third age Sauron had many MANY orc overseers who kept the mindless rabble in check and some who were given command on the front lines to mimic what was seen in ages past, (evil cannot create anew but only mimic that which is good), the orcs during this time period regardless of the wormhole jumps happening in this show should not be organised and cohesive at all, in fact they should be holed up fearing for their lives and eking a living out of whatever scraps they can find, until such a time that enough of them are gathered to form a horde, but i guess these details don't matter when the show has bastardised so much of the lore what's another egregious rewrite among a plethora of others right?

Mate, you're the one making the leaps here.
1. You claim that the elves should have seen the trench without knowing where is it and without understanding how far a human being can travel on foot in a relatively short amount of time.
2. You conveniently ignore the fact that the tower was surrounded by huge mountain ranges, limiting the view even more.
3. You talk about burning villageS while in reality we see ONE village being ransacked immediatelly before the elves being captured (we can still see it burning when arriving on the scene). Said village is also located in a damn valley, which means the smoke would've been rather difficult to spot.
4. You make it sound like the whole Southlands are burning and the elves are blind to it, when there's nothing to support that.
5. Also, a band of elves coming home with ZERO knowledge of the danger (in fact being absolutely sure there's NO danger) can indeed be ambushed, because why not?
Again did you watch the show? We learn in the first part of the first episode that the elves spent thousands of years waging a war and even after victory spent a long time ensuring no trace was left. You are also incorrect about Tolkien as he never went into in-depth background about the full capabilities of groups and races prior to engaging them as part of the story.
Then why not attack Tolkien's work for those flaws instead of just the show? Isn't it strange how you leave out that the show is echoing the flaws of its source material. That is why you say you'll address them on a case by case basis because you are only interested in tearing down the show and not how the show depicts Tolkien's style of writing. Just like how you say for me to take a course on story telling when Tolkien does the things you are saying are bad story telling. Strange, right? That somehow you are such an accomplished writer that you know more then Tolkien the father of modern fantasy.And where have I defended these points?
Why are you interested in this show if you think Tolkien told a bad story and a basic course on writing would have been able to fix his problems?
- - - Updated - - -
I'm curious if you feel Tauriel was "a toxic male" because she wanted to fight evil while Legolas wanted to return home?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GuY384d7DEY
- - - Updated - - -
Tolkien created huge auxilarry works to establish things off-screen from his main stories. Lmao. Also https://lotr.fandom.com/wiki/Orcs#Second_Age. Sauron had control of some orcs while others refused his leadership (at first).
"Man is his own star. His acts are his angels, good or ill, While his fatal shadows walk silently beside him."-Rhyme of the Primeval Paradine AFC 54
You know a community is bad when moderators lock a thread because "...this isnt the place to talk about it either seeing as it will get trolled..."
Evil only wins when it spreads. It can cause destruction, it can cause death—but those are consequences of its nature, not its victory. Not its goal. The danger of evil, the purpose of evil, is that it causes those who would oppose it to become evil also.
1. I fully understand how far humans (these aren't humans btw, but elfs) can travel. We have no indication how far it is true, but obviously it is close enough for them to get to quickly, to tunnel to towns quickly, which means it is at most 1-2 days, and that is digging. Elves are supposed to see far, like miles far, they also have a tower to expand the distance they can see. Would they see tiny orcs no, but this is A MASSIVE CUT IN THE FOREST and trench, it would be visible for many miles, not to mention the smoke from it. You are telling me no elves noticed it for the weeks/months it would take to dig it? none of them ventured in that direction?
2. It wasn't surrounded by huge mountains, it has mountains on opposite sides. This also means btw they have less area to monitor/less areas for the orcs to hide as they aren't going over the mountains. This means more chance for them to run into the orcs as they are patrolling less area. This tower is also very fucking tall, like hundreds of meters tall/on a mountains edge. HOW DO THE ORCS SURPRISE THEM.
3. They mention others, but you do know SMOKE RISES. So a whole village burning would have had a lot of smoke rising form it, that would be visible from miles away. It wouldn't be hard to spot.
4. ... The show gives us an image of the "tunnel" being like over a mile long and hundreds of feet wide. That is a massive amount of trees that are shown burn, and since we have no reason to believe otherwise they apparently did tree burning the whole time meaning thousands of trees were being burnt. That isn't something small you ignore/don't notice. You are acting like it is some chimney fires, this is more like a controlled forest fire, it would be noticed.
5. All of them in a tower on a mountains edge are ambushed AND CAPTURED?
How far do we have to ass pull to make this somehow maybe kinda of make sense? Why defend this? Just admit it is pretty shitty writing, because it is. I mean if you are okay with this low a level of writing I guess more power to you, I expect better, especially from a billion dollar show, and double that expectation for something written by Tolkien.
The issue with that then becomes they had to have tunnels/traps set near the tower/between the Tower and the north. Yet the humans all make it to the tower with no issues, meaning it would have to be in the north. This means orcs got around/past the Elves with none the wiser to setup a trap for them than then also captured all of them.
So either the orcs scouted the elves tower/routes without being seen or the have you heard of Sauron guy has other friends that report to the orcs/Adar. If they is the way they want to go, okay, but show more things that suggest treason/spies to lay the foundation for it. Also have a hard time believing the Elves who show such disdain to humans allow them to come up to their tower and map it out for orcs.
To many things have to go right to make this scenario work/logical for me.
Yes and we never actually see the Elves being capable here either. You see a bunch of them struggling, with Galadriel's brother having died there. We don't even see the victory really, we see the aftermath and implied victory all focused on its losses. Again, the entire tone of this show is built around the Elves failing. Even in victory, it's all focused on what they've lost. We don't really see Elves as being at a height of power until we see the city of Lindon, and even then its importance is all through exposition, not actually shown. The establishment of the Elves as being a power so far is quite underwhelming. And I'm saying this as objectively as possible as I'm trying to take in this series from the perspective of someone who has zero understanding of Middle Earth and sees what the show is trying to do to establish everything on its own.
So far, I don't think it's done a good job at world-building. It leans too heavily on expecting you to have watched Lord of the Rings, or being a casual viewer who doesn't think too deeply about the inconsistency of having Sauron marked an Elf with his mark thousands of years eariler that ends up being explained to be a map and a plan to be enacted on right now IF Morgoth happened to be defeated.
Because the topic of this thread is Rings of Power and not the Tolkien books?Then why not attack Tolkien's work for those flaws instead of just the show?
Like what the fuck kind of question is that? Do you even know what the topic of this thread is? Or do you think I should be criticizing Game of Thrones and all these other fantasy settings here just so you can get a broader idea of where I'm coming from?
Rings of Power is beholden to itself, and its problems stem from lacking establishing its own world and lore. It builds heavily off the expectation that the audience must have watched Lord of the Rings to understand what an Elf or a Dwarf or a Wizard is. That is part of the problem I point out, because it doesn't do enough to establish these characters and their capabilities on their own prior to unfolding the story. They simply throw the characters in, sometimes in a way that subverts expectations (having expected you to have watched LOTR) and is quite unapologetic about it. And it ends up with the world building being a complete mess, with many of the inconsistencies being pointed out here.
Because this isn't Tolkien's story?Why are you interested in this show if you think Tolkien told a bad story and a basic course on writing would have been able to fix his problems?
Rings of Power isn't written by Tolkien, and most of the narrative so far is completely new and has no bearing on the events in the appendices. The entire Watchtower and Southlands arc doesn't appear in Tolkien's work at all, for example.
Last edited by Triceron; 2022-09-19 at 06:51 PM.
Evil only wins when it spreads. It can cause destruction, it can cause death—but those are consequences of its nature, not its victory. Not its goal. The danger of evil, the purpose of evil, is that it causes those who would oppose it to become evil also.
So you see no reason why the Author of the work the show is based on is relevant? Isn't it strange how here you are arguing the source material and Tolkien can't be referenced in a discussion about the show while at the same time others have complained that the show doesn't have enough of Tolkien and the source material? Lmao.
That is on top of your unrealistic expectation that a show has to define Dwarves, Elves, and offer a introductory class on its world prior to showing even the first episode. What show has every done that? Made its viewers an expert on its world prior to watching any or all of its episodes? This is again where your bias shows through because you are setting impossible expectations for the show then complaining when they are not met.
"Man is his own star. His acts are his angels, good or ill, While his fatal shadows walk silently beside him."-Rhyme of the Primeval Paradine AFC 54
You know a community is bad when moderators lock a thread because "...this isnt the place to talk about it either seeing as it will get trolled..."

You're ignoring one big difference here: the humans are being observed (for generations even) by the elves, while the orcs are not even known to exist. In all of those years of keeping an eye on the humans, the elves see nothing that would suggest they are cooperating with some malicious force (because, obviously, they don't). It would take a lot more cunning to deceive the elves while being observed than while living in the shadows, that's for sure. I highly doubt the humans we see in the show would be capable of that level of cunning, but that's just me.
And yes, some events are timed conveniently, like in most plots known to the humanity (Lord of the Rings - the book - has some convenient moments too, ie. the eagles appearing just in time, but not only). But the watchers being called back at that particular point in time is just a single facet of a bigger story arc of elves growing complacent and oblivious to threats. It's convenient, but it keeps the story succint (and the show's already slow in the first episodes), so I can live with that.
But why would the tower need any more reason to exist? Was it said somewhere that it's central to the plot...? Why would you give that tower more meaning than it has to have? Surely, there are plenty of towers in the world; this particular one has an important character manning it, so we get to know a bit of its story. Is it so difficult to believe that there is a tower in the world that had some importance in the past, but with time, lost most of it? Is it difficult to believe that the elves would leave a small unit there "just in case", even though there was no immediate threat? I mean, if there was a war somewhere in the world and the elves would send half of their army to a tower in the middle of nowhere, that would be rather sketchy, but it's a time of peace - surely you can spare like five people to man a tower (until you decide there's no point anymore, like they do in the show?). Every made-up world has a history we don't need to know in detail, so why do you make so much fuss about a tower manned by a handful of soliders of no real importance? Does every tower have to have an important meaning?
- - - Updated - - -
Do you even watch the show, mate? When Arondir and Bronwyn travel to the village, Bronwyn asks Arondir where are the other elves and he replies: "They are probably looking for me" (or something to that extent), because they were supposed to leave already. So no, they were not in the tower.
I'll end it here, and you let me know when you actually watch the show.
Hence my north comment, as I believe the tower is in the northern end of the valley between the two mountains. Unless the orcs tunneled through mountains or went all the way around/over, they would have to tunnel/travel near the tower to get past them for a trap. The other option is the orcs are located between where the elves/southlanders are and the north, which I would struggle with too.
Like I said a few posts up, if instead of capturing all these elves they had Arondir's buddy tell them they fought a fierce battle and many elves died, but he believes some got away to warn others, I am okay with it. Repeating myself, but then you have him suggest they need to escape because the orcs are in wildly larger numbers than expected/tunneling which is worrying since the Elf reinforcements will be expecting a dumb band of orcs in the open and could get ambushed. This also allows you to have your mini helms deep moment (as much as I dislike it) with the reinforcements at dawn but watchers have some foreshadowing rather than having to fill in every gap and full on ass pull later.
So now I have to infer that Arondir saying "they are probably looking for me" means hours after he left EVERY elf went looking for him and got ambushed? No they wouldn't possible send his one buddy who has been working with him/knows him well to find him? The others don't have to pack up supplies/get ready to move out of the tower? REALLY? Okay mate, lets just agree to disagree, cause you are making my brain hurt. I have watched the show, I just don't turn my brain off when I do.
I'm not the one making those complaints though, so you can't call me out for being biased when you're clearly having a problem with other people's arguments. And I'm not putting any stipulations on what 'can or can not' be discussed, I'm literally telling you why I'm not doing what you're accusing me of doing.
It's not strange at all that I'm criticizing the show for its own problems and not merely for 'veering from Tolkien's work'. I don't hold Tolkien's own work on any pedestal here, since I've always been a critic of anyone taking the Second Age and turning it into a show because it was really never set up to be one. It's an epic that spans thousands of years which is not really meant to be translated to the 'big screen'.
Everything I've pointed out about RoP's flaws are directly a result of its own narrative. I'm not sure what else you're trying to project on to my argument here, perhaps you're getting me confused with other people you're arguing with?
Then imagine the impression of what a newcomer to the series would expect of Elves if all they see were them constantly being set up to fail, with only Galadriel and Arondir being the only characters who seemed to be capable of anything. I don't think you have enough forethought to consider this since your own bias has clouded your judgement, like you thinking the Elves actually hit the Snow Troll.That is on top of your unrealistic expectation that a show has to define Dwarves, Elves, and offer a introductory class on its world prior to showing even the first episode. What show has every done that? Made its viewers an expert on its world prior to watching any or all of its episodes? This is again where your bias shows through because you are setting impossible expectations for the show then complaining when they are not met.
I mean your failure to even admit to this mistake shows how stubborn and delusional you're capable of being to put unrealistic standards on other people's expectations. You'd argue that the show is free from criticisms because you don't even acknowledge them existing, you just change the show entirely to imply the Elves hit the Snow Troll and it was more than enough to establish that they were capable fighters and that there was never any problem with the way the show handles their portrayal.
If you can't even admit a little mistake for us to reach a common ground, then I'm gonna continue illustrating how pointless your argument is considering you're ready to change the events of the show for the sake of arguing.
How can you possibly realize my point if you're unwilling to acknowledge the things I'm criticizing even happened in the show?
Last edited by Triceron; 2022-09-19 at 07:07 PM.

I acknowledged that them hitting it was an argument that isn't worth having and it looked like they never did even though they engaged in fighting the troll. That happened weeks ago and there is no point in your bringing it up as it has no relevance to anything being discussed now. Lmao. Let it go. Accept that you once again lost an argument online. I did despite your claims I didn't.
No show is expected to give a primer on the entire world before it airs. You are assigning unrealistic expectations to this show. Why?
"Man is his own star. His acts are his angels, good or ill, While his fatal shadows walk silently beside him."-Rhyme of the Primeval Paradine AFC 54
You know a community is bad when moderators lock a thread because "...this isnt the place to talk about it either seeing as it will get trolled..."