Lord of the Rings TV Series Purchased by Amazon

[Syegfryed]

Using 1 metric that isnt all the strong in the first place proves your point has failed, ppl who dont like something are usually more vocal about it while others will not bother to do a review, you need multiple sources to get even the slightest amount of usuable information. If house of the dragon had a long standing book that has been out for decades in sure many would find plenty wrong about it and complain just as much, i dont even currently care about watching house of the dragon currently.

The show is proven to be a good series regardless of your failed attempts of saying otherwise because you have nothing that backs you up.

So, the data proved you wrong, you came here to say the data is wrong, but you didn't bring any data to counter it, and you insist to be good because you like it

There is not much here to say, it was funny not gonna lie

[Xath]

They are using established characters, events and locations in a TV series. Seems like textbook adaptation to me?
You can criticize a lot about this series and rightfully so but it is an adaptation.

It's at most an inspired by tag it's absolutely not an adaptation considering even the stuff they have access to they are making substantial changes to.

- - - Updated - - -

Using 1 metric that isnt all the strong in the first place proves your point has failed, ppl who dont like something are usually more vocal about it while others will not bother to do a review, you need multiple sources to get even the slightest amount of usuable information. If house of the dragon had a long standing book that has been out for decades in sure many would find plenty wrong about it and complain just as much, i dont even currently care about watching house of the dragon currently.

The show is proven to be a good series regardless of your failed attempts of saying otherwise because you have nothing that backs you up.

There is literally nothing to back up your claims meanwhile audience reviews have gotten worse and worse as the season has continued.

[kenn9530]

So, the data proved you wrong, you came here to say the data is wrong, but you didn't bring any data to counter it, and you insist to be good because you like it

There is not much here to say, it was funny not gonna lie

No the data proves you wrong, RT is one of the most inaccurate review sites that exist so it doesnt help your case at all, if you use data from all the sources you can get a more accurate picture but its still a review which are not that accurate in the first place, it gives a general outline nothing more.

- - - Updated - - -

There is literally nothing to back up your claims meanwhile audience reviews have gotten worse and worse as the season has continued.

All the data backs what im saying that the show is good, you have already been proven wrong in other threads about how wrong you always are when the data is right in your face saying the opposite.

[Biomega]

All the data backs what im saying that the show is good

Clearly not ALL the data. You just said RT is inaccurate. Ostensible what you refer to as "all the sources" is more accurate, then?

Or is this just "yeah it's accurate if we ignore the obvious troll reviews, i.e. the bad ones" all over again, like it always is?

[Shadowferal]

No the data proves you wrong, RT is one of the most inaccurate review sites that exist so it doesnt help your case at all, if you use data from all the sources you can get a more accurate picture but its still a review which are not that accurate in the first place, it gives a general outline nothing more. - - - Updated - - - All the data backs what im saying that the show is good, you have already been proven wrong in other threads about how wrong you always are when the data is right in your face saying the opposite.

The only data you claim to have is your own little opinion.

[Triceron]

No the data proves you wrong, RT is one of the most inaccurate review sites that exist so it doesnt help your case at all, if you use data from all the sources you can get a more accurate picture but its still a review which are not that accurate in the first place, it gives a general outline nothing more.

All the data backs what im saying that the show is good, you have already been proven wrong in other threads about how wrong you always are when the data is right in your face saying the opposite.

If you're just ignoring the bad reviews then there's no point in even talking about reviews. You're just talking about ignorant bias.

[Daedius]

The show keeps delivering amazing visuals that get ruined as soon as someone talks.

I think Lloyd Owen is great for Captain Elendil.

[bledgor]

I think Lloyd Owen is great for Captain Elendil.

He is quite good actually, sadly feel that his son Isildur was a miss (though I guess most of the bad is the writing/dialogue for him, which isn't the actors fault).

[kenn9530]

Clearly not ALL the data. You just said RT is inaccurate. Ostensible what you refer to as "all the sources" is more accurate, then?

Or is this just "yeah it's accurate if we ignore the obvious troll reviews, i.e. the bad ones" all over again, like it always is?

All the data available proves it to be rated as a good show even with the inaccurate reviews, try again because your point has failed again.

- - - Updated - - -

The only data you claim to have is your own little opinion.

The data from all the reviews is not my own little opinion its there for anyone to see, sorry to burst your bubble but the data just proves the show is good regardless of your own wrong views.

- - - Updated - - -

If you're just ignoring the bad reviews then there's no point in even talking about reviews. You're just talking about ignorant bias.

Im not ignoring any reviews, but if you ignore those the show jumps up even higher, the ones who are ignorant are whoever leaves the lowest of reviews in the first place, you are lying if you think a 1/10 review is anywhere near legit.

[Xath]

All the data available proves it to be rated as a good show even with the inaccurate reviews, try again because your point has failed again.

- - - Updated - - -



The data from all the reviews is not my own little opinion its there for anyone to see, sorry to burst your bubble but the data just proves the show is good regardless of your own wrong views.

- - - Updated - - -



Im not ignoring any reviews, but if you ignore those the show jumps up even higher, the ones who are ignorant are whoever leaves the lowest of reviews in the first place, you are lying if you think a 1/10 review is anywhere near legit.

You are lying if you think a 10/10 review is anywhere near legit yet you don't discount those.

Also for your claims that more people like it than don't to be even close to accurate you would need to show it hasn't lost over 50% of it's viewership base that watched the first episode and I gotta be honest I really doubt the numbers bear that out. That's not even including the people who straight up just didn't watch it because of how much stuff was revealed to be changed before it even went to air.

[Shadowferal]

The data from all the reviews is not my own little opinion its there for anyone to see, sorry to burst your bubble but the data just proves the show is good regardless of your own wrong views.

You count only what you want to see and dismiss any that you disagree with. That is not just your little opinion, but a sad one.

[Biomega]

All the data available proves it to be rated as a good show even with the inaccurate reviews, try again because your point has failed again.

But you admitted it's not ALL the data. You said RT was low, but inaccurate.

So what data are you including, and what data are you excluding - and why?

[kenn9530]

You are lying if you think a 10/10 review is anywhere near legit yet you don't discount those.

Also for your claims that more people like it than don't to be even close to accurate you would need to show it hasn't lost over 50% of it's viewership base that watched the first episode and I gotta be honest I really doubt the numbers bear that out. That's not even including the people who straight up just didn't watch it because of how much stuff was revealed to be changed before it even went to air.

a 10/10 is a legit rating because if you like something you can give it a 10/10, but haters will exclude everything and give it a false 1/10 rating out of spite, your logic is very flawed.

Only amazon know the viewer numbers and they dont really matter all that much on a streaming platform anyway, many more ppl wait for a full shows release rather than watch episode by episode, dont talk about things you dont know.

- - - Updated - - -

But you admitted it's not ALL the data. You said RT was low, but inaccurate.

So what data are you including, and what data are you excluding - and why?

I have not excluded any data, if you take all sites that give reviews the show still comes out as good regardless of the BS hater reviews or not, on average the show is 70% of higher liked through all sites.

[Triceron]

Im not ignoring any reviews, but if you ignore those the show jumps up even higher, the ones who are ignorant are whoever leaves the lowest of reviews in the first place, you are lying if you think a 1/10 review is anywhere near legit.

You read any of the reviews? There's plenty of legit ones under 5. Like tons.

You seen any of the trailers or teasers on youtube? Dislikes are well higher than likes as well.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6io...nel=VitaminCon

364 likes, 1.7k dislikes.

[kenn9530]

You count only what you want to see and dismiss any that you disagree with. That is not just your little opinion, but a sad one.

What are you on about, you are talking nonsense, the current data now without anything removed puts the show on average 70% or higher and thats a good mark for most shows, if you removed the BS reviews it would be over 80% easily, your opinion has no weight because the show being good or not is not an opinion its fact backed up by plenty of available data.

- - - Updated - - -

You read any of the reviews? There's plenty of legit ones under 5. Like tons.

You seen any of the trailers or teasers on youtube? Dislikes are well higher than likes as well.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6io...nel=VitaminCon

364 likes, 1.7k dislikes.

if its a 1 star or 1/10 its not legit, sorry to burst your bubble but thats just ppl talking BS because they are upset they are not getting what they wanted.

[Biomega]

if its a 1 star or 1/10 its not legit, sorry to burst your bubble but thats just ppl talking BS because they are upset they are not getting what they wanted.

And you're excluding the 5-star and 10/10 ones, too, then, right?

[kenn9530]

And you're excluding the 5-star and 10/10 ones, too, then, right?

A high review is legit, a 1/10 review is not, you are not going to win any argument with your style of thinking, you could give RoP a 3-4/10 just for visuals alone so try harder.

[Biomega]

A high review is legit, a 1/10 review is not

DING DING DING DING

Ladies and gentlemen, we have arrived at the predicted destination.

Moving on, then.

[kenn9530]

DING DING DING DING

Ladies and gentlemen, we have arrived at the predicted destination.

Moving on, then.

You tried but your unable to win any sort of discussion with your style of thinking, if you dont think ppl cant just enjoy things and rate it highly then you have a very narrow view of the world, a low review however is targetted in spite just because that person feels they are entitled to something different.

[Biomega]

You tried but your unable to win any sort of discussion with your style of thinking

It's true. I am unable to bend my style of thinking to the "ignore the bad reviews, keep the good reviews" straddle. Missing mental flexibility, I suppose, that precludes me from enganging in the cranial proctology others seem to so enjoy. Wish I bent that far, but alas...