You can tell me that Elven Forges have the ability to unbake a cake back into its original ingredients as much as you'd like, it doesn't make you sound any less ridiculous. You're not making sense out of a fantasy scenario by applying false logic to it. I mean I could just as much say a robot from the future came back in time off screen and used his technology to separate the metals for them just the same. It doesn't make it any more sensible as an explanation. It's pointless to even try to explain it. It's a fictional scenario with inconsistencies, that's just what it will be.
You can stop any time dude. I'm not the one who claimed this to be a mistake at all. I said from the beginning, this is merely how the show depicts it, it is movie magic, and it is unrealistic. Whether it is a mistake or not is not something I will call it out for being, it's merely an inconsistency.
Just like Smaug in the first Hobbit movie was hinted at having front claws (4 legs), while his full reveal and design in the 2nd movie is shown as a Wyvern design. I can accept this as an inconsistency and as a design change - movie magic. I don't need someone telling me how Smaug magically lost his forearms or had an 'evolutionary shift' to explain the changes. I don't need someone telling me how my perception of this change being inconsistent is wrong because I don't know the magical biology of Dragons. Like, these are non-arguments for the sake of perpetuating some bad faith bullshit.
You can stop shitposting any time.