No, I don't see any of this as debating at all. It's merely arguing, and in some cases, indirect insults and attacks.
I mean, we're in MMO-C forums, let's not pretend we're having formal debates here. Especially if you're quoting my responses to Rhorle, lol. Have you actually read the response that you quoted? Probably not since you ended up calling this a debate lol.
The Lord of the Rings referring to Sauron is not a theory, it is a fact. Alternative theories do not change the facts. I mean, anyone wants to push forth an alternate theory, by all means do so. It just doesn't change the fact there is a definitive answer already. It's not a debate, it's merely expressing an alternate theory for what's clearly answered.Also, you realize people are allowed to make inferences and theories WITHOUT tolkien having spoken out about something? There is no law that says tolkien needs to hold your hand =P
Look at my post of the Gandalf is a Fighter meme example above. Gandalf is definitively a wizard, and yet I'd still acknowledge theories like Gandalf is a Fighter because it's a funny meme. It doesn't mean presenting theories immediately equates to definitive facts being debateable, there are many different contexts to having theories, like as a funny meme.
So you're right, there is no law against making theories that are ultimately wrong. People can present theories that are wrong if they wish. I didn't say people can't post alternative theories, I said there is one definitive answer. It wouldn't be a debate, just an argument in ignorance really. And sometimes it can be for the sake of entertainment, like making the argument that Gandalf is a Fighter.
Last edited by Triceron; 2022-10-23 at 01:33 AM.
Your first post doesn't matter when you literally said something else in a later post. I've also addressed your first post as well already.
- - - Updated - - -
I didn't claim it was a quote from you. I used it for the context of your post that said "exactly this". Because you know you said exactly this after quoting that part of my post. Lmao.
"Man is his own star. His acts are his angels, good or ill, While his fatal shadows walk silently beside him."-Rhyme of the Primeval Paradine AFC 54
You know a community is bad when moderators lock a thread because "...this isnt the place to talk about it either seeing as it will get trolled..."
No, it fucking doesn’t. The continuity is that Pharazon took control AFTER Palantir died (which of course didn’t happen till the finale, leaving that arc till next season) preventing Miriel from claiming her right of succession. Miriel being regent prior to that (a temporary title by definition) doesn’t change that continuity. Again, this is just people like you using words you don’t understand to bitch about details that aren’t even a problem from a strictly lore sense.
- - - Updated - - -
Why would he need to infiltrate them again?
At this point the elves aren’t aware that the rings are part of some big corrupting mind control scheme so there’s no reason why they wouldn’t make more once Durin IV restarts the mithril mining. Or Sauron just makes the lesser ones himself. He’s the one that hands them out to the dwarves and men (except for one that went to Durin) so either way they end up in his hands before being distributed.
I really hope there is a strong characterization for each of the Ringwraiths. I really liked what they did with Adar, and would want to see that level of characterization for the Nazgul. But I have a sinking feeling they'll just do em dirty and make em out like the Mystics and completely make em faceless mooks that lack any personality at all.
On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.
- H. L. Mencken
On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.
- H. L. Mencken
Last edited by Triceron; 2022-10-23 at 04:02 AM.
Transformers is marketed at an lcd audience lotr isn't which is the problem with the show runners they are choosing for these shows. They are much more suited to running stuff like survivor.
- - - Updated - - -
I don't need to watch it in order to find out what new horrible retcon has been done for the week
You'll never be able to read/listen/watch everything. You're always going to have to make choices about what you're going to spend your time reading/listening/watching. I'm just suggesting that people might be happier spending their time with things they actually like instead.
But specifically, in the context of this conversation, I am talking about people that have decided they do not like Rings of Power. They could have stopped weatching Rings of Power as soon as they made that discovery. But they kept watching until the end of the season...and will continue to watch next season.
On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.
- H. L. Mencken
You have to watch every series to the end to discover if you were "right" about not liking it?
That's a lot of time wasted on things you don't like that you could have spent on things you do.
For myself, I'm not going to watch 20 seasons of Grey's Anatomy just to confirm I do not like Grey's Anatomy.
On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.
- H. L. Mencken
Yeah but if you look at the numbers and how many people are actually watching the show, it's a similar lcd casual audience who may have watched the LOTR movies but never read the books or know anything about the 2nd Age.
And it worked for Amazon. Even if the show is getting panned by critics and enthusiasts, the casuals are eating it up.
It might not be House of the Dragon success, but few shows are so it'd not be worth comparing. Like, Andor is a way better show than Rings of Power, but it's got shit viewership sadly. Better shows don't always equal success.
Last edited by Triceron; 2022-10-23 at 06:34 AM.
Yes, it does. I'm sorry that your reading comprehension is so terrible. The poem attributes Rings to Ringbearers. 3 for the elves, 7 for the dwarves, 9 for men, and one for the Dark Lord. The Lord of the Rings.
You're correct that it isn't a faithful adaptation. But no, as I've explained, it makes no sense for them to share a screen since both are to be considered a reincarnation of the same dwarf. What happened here is that the writes looked up the lineage of Durin and failed to comprehend what the relation between the first dwarven kings was.
And you can repeat the 'compressed timeline' argument all you like, that doesn't make it any better. It only proves that the writers have no clue how to build tension, other than vastly accelerating events. Because they need the elves to gaze in awe upon something, for the dramatic shot. So they simply print out three rings, that, even though they're not supposed to be touched by Sauron, were touched by him. Awesome job.
On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.
- H. L. Mencken