Lord of the Rings TV Series Purchased by Amazon

[Triceron]

It was supposed to be a keynote address and award acceptance but turned into a recorded interview because of a positive Covid diagnoses. It isn't a message like you are trying to claim. Regardless of your opinion of that just provide a source for your claim. The only one being dishonest here is yourself because instead of providing a source to your claims you turn to attacking me. Just put me back on ignore already.

If you admit that it didn't actually address what it was intended to do then you can't exactly use that as an example of addressing something that it did not manage to.

Like I said, you're being dishonest with the very examples you're bringing forth. You're spinning things for the sake of arguing. Calling you out on this isn't an insult against you, it's pointing out you're intentionally trying to twist facts.

It comes down to a simple question - Has Amazon come out to make any statement about Rings of Power's performance (success) after the finale? No, they have not. Whether you compare this to HBO, who has spoken out on HoD's success, or even Amazon's own past with the Boys, which they also talked about being successful and moving forward on spinoffs and sequels, we're actually getting very little talks from them on Rings of Power outside of what we know they've already planned.

It's really something simple that you can agree on since you even started with an argument saying 'they don't have to do that', so I'm not sure why you even pivoted on that point in trying to bring up this mipcom thing as an example at all. You're literally just trying to twist the facts now to fit a completely different argument. And it has nothing to do with what I've said. That is dishonest as fuck, since you're not actually sticking to the context of the conversation and just going on a tangent and implying I was making arguments that were never made in the first place.


If you really want to be ignored that much, just stop replying. I'm not holding a gun to your head in having to read my replies or making you hit that reply button. Don't place that blame on me, dude. You are in control of your own actions. I'm not the one arguing about their marketting or whatever. You brought that up, not me.

[rhorle]

Like I said, you're being dishonest with the very examples you're bringing forth. You're spinning things for the sake of arguing. Calling you out on this isn't an insult against you, it's pointing out you're intentionally trying to twist facts.

I'm not twisting any facts. You said they made no statements. I provide some statements they made. You then tried to twist a remote interview because of Covid-19 was "pre-recording marketing" and dismissed it. You keep refusing to provide a source of where Amazon did what you want for other shows. The only one dishonest here is yourself and you are now ranting about me, the poster, as a defense for your own unwillingness to prove your claim.

[Triceron]

I'm not twisting any facts. You said they made no statements. I provide some statements they made. You then tried to twist a remote interview because of Covid-19 was "pre-recording marketing" and dismissed it. You keep refusing to provide a source of where Amazon did what you want for other shows. The only one dishonest here is yourself and you are now ranting about me, the poster, as a defense for your own unwillingness to prove your claim.

Which is, again, statements taken out of context.

If I'm replying to someone who was talking about the performance of the series, then that is the context of my reply. That you're then interpreting the statement as a blanket 'They didn't make any statement at all' then that is your own failure to address the context of the replyg.

You just read something you didn't like, jumped into a conversation that you weren't a part of, picked what you wanted to argue and went forward with it. Again, nothing to do with what I've said, everything to do with you wanting to argue what you choose to. I was replying to someone who was already talking about negative reviews and rumors, and my reply is to say that Amazon has been silent on addressing any of the rumors or performance of the series after the finale.

This has nothing to do with them actually releasing marketting content after the finale, lol. I know the podcast exists and had an episode that aired after the finale. That's clearly not what I was talking about.

The only thing that you've said that was relevant to what I've said was that they don't have to say anything. Sure, they don't have to. That is your opinion and I'm fine with disagreeing with you on that. I think it is important because other companies like HBO already did so for House of the Dragon, and HBO or its spokespeople/reps (GRRM included) have confirmed or dispelled rumors of cancelled spinoffs. IMO, they're very transparent about the performance of their shows and what they have planned.

[kenn9530]

Also people pretend it was a massive success, the show spent over 600 million on this season alone, you need to get MASSIVE numbers to justify that, not just good or even great numbers, and the fact it isn't sitting on top for not even weeks is proof the show performed subpar.

Its had over 100 million viewers so it is a massive success, the company generates over 2 billion a month just from amazon prime, where is your proof when you claim the show isnt a success.

Amazon invest in new and more shows to retain and gain more amazon prime subs, so all money spent is further investment, its essential to keep bringing in new shows/films.

[rhorle]

You just read something you didn't like, jumped into a conversation that you weren't a part of, picked what you wanted to argue and went forward with it. Again, nothing to do with what I've said, everything to do with you wanting to argue what you choose to. I was replying to someone who was already talking about negative reviews and rumors, and my reply is to say that Amazon has been silent on addressing any of the rumors or performance of the series after the finale.

Not to mention Amazon has been completely silent after the series finished. Considering how much they were touting the success of the show at launch, the silence now is deafening.

They were not completely silent after the series finished. It was only after you were proven wrong on that count that you shifted the goalposts of your statement. You've yet to provide a source to prove that Amazon has done so for other shows. We know as much about season 2 of HotD as we do about season 2 of RoP. Very little. HBO has talked about performance where Amazon has not. They usually don't though so their silence on that subject doesn't mean anything.

Will you provide proof of your claim that Amazon does talk about series success immediately following the series? Or will you just deflect with commentary about myself?

[Triceron]

They were not completely silent after the series finished.

Okay, I agree with you then. They weren't completely silent. They released post-finale podcast episodes and had a pre-recorded Mipcom interview.

Happy?

HBO has talked about performance where Amazon has not. They usually don't though so their silence on that subject doesn't mean anything.

And as I've said, I'm happy to disagree with you on that. It doesn't mean there isn't any silence. All you're providing here is your opinion, and one that I'm not contending whatsoever. Repeating yourself isn't changing anything since I've addressed that above.

That you think they don't need to doesn't mean the silence isn't there, especially in light of the rumors and ambiguity surrounding the show's performance and future. All we know is that they're still dedicated to pushing out 5 seasons, that's it. They've been way more transparent with the Boys than they have with Rings of Power. If you think they don't have to be transparent, that's fine.

Why you feel this needs to be defended, I'm not sure. All you're doing is choosing to take statements I've made out of context, and nitpicking arguments which I'm in no way making in the first place. I mean, if you want to argue technicalities then sure, I'll let you have em. Doesn't change anything that I said really. It's just you being anal retentive.

[rhorle]

And as I've said, I'm happy to disagree with you on that. It doesn't mean there isn't any silence. All you're providing here is your opinion, and one that I'm not contending whatsoever. Repeating yourself isn't changing anything since I've addressed that above.

You have done nothing but contend that opinion. Even saying they did something without providing any proof. Why does a show need to brag about its performance in order for it to be a success? There have always been rumors. There is a website that has dedicated itself to lies about the show for over a year prior to its release. You are making a mountain out of a mole hill. Amazon made no official press release about the boys post Season. They talked about its growth in past seasons when announcing it was renewed for Season 4. But we don't know much about season 4.

[Triceron]

Amazon made no official press release about the boys post Season. They talked about its growth in past seasons when announcing it was renewed for Season 4. But we don't know much about season 4.

Sure they have. They made talks of the Boys' success when it first came out and talked about its sequels and spinoff projects. I'm not talking specifically about Season 3 of the Boys.

You have done nothing but contend that opinion.

Er, I haven't contended it at all.

All I said is the silence is defeaning, and repeated the point that they haven't said anything about the performance of the show post-finale.

Whatever you're implying is contending your opinion is really just you. I'm not sure how repeating a statement I made before you even presented your opinion constitutes as contending your opinion. If I took a poop in a toilet and you scooped it out and put it in your cheerios, you can't turn that around to say I pooped in your cheerios.

[Dhrizzle]

It has "Lord of the Rings" in the name, what did you expect? Same thing with the new "Star Wars" trilogy. There's a huge fanbase that loves these franchises, to see it treated like shit will obviously make people very mad.

Most of the noise comes from YouTube drama fans who think "treated like shit" is an accurate way of describing an adaptation, probably not that many actual Tolkien fans.

[rhorle]

Sure they have. They made talks of the Boys' success when it first came out and talked about its sequels and spinoff projects. I'm not talking specifically about Season 3 of the Boys.

Do you have links to them talking about it? As their official press releases don't match your claims. They've talked about Rings of Power. Not much. That lack of specific information you want isn't deafening at all. Why can a show only be good if it brags about itself right away?

[Triceron]

They've talked about Rings of Power. Not much. That lack of specific information you want isn't deafening at all. Why can a show only be good if it brags about itself right away?

The silence that I'm referring to is contextually specific to the performance of the show and anything to dispel the rumors. I can repeat this a billion times and you'll still not listen, and by not considering this there's no way to move forward with this discussion. Like, I'm not sure what you want here.

You are being anal retentive, that is it. If you don't think it is defeaning then that is your opinion. I'm not quite sure you need to address this as though 'silence is defeaning' is something that has to apply to you. You understand that this is an expression of my own opinion, right? Because if it's not defeaning to you, surely you understand the nuance of subtext and opinion, yes? That this reply to a comment to someone else's post might not have anything to do with your own opinion?

I mean, you came at this with no intention of addressing the context of my original reply even after I made it clear what I was talking about. What exactly are you arguing here, that you don't think the silence is defeaning? Well I am fine you have that opinion. What more do you need here?

Why can a show only be good if it brags about itself right away?

I wouldn't know, you would have to ask the one who made that argument why they think that would be true. Obviously since I never said anything remotely close to that at all, I wouldn't be able to answer the question that you're presenting.

I'm sorry, I can't answer the arguments you're arguing yourself with.

[rhorle]

The silence that I'm referring to is contextually specific to the performance of the show and anything to dispel the rumors. I can repeat this a billion times and you'll still not listen, so yes you are being dishonest by not considering the conversation we're having now and moving forward with it.

Why is a show required to dispel rumors every time one occurs? Why do they have to do it within X time frame from last episode airing? Why does lack of doing so translate to the show believing they failed? Of course this is an expression of your own opinion. Why can't you explain your own opinion with out turning to predictable attacks/focus on me?

[Lorgar Aurelian]

so yes you are being dishonest

Do you not think this is a bit ironic when you pointed to the boys releasing info multiple times but won’t respond to him asking for any sort of evidence multiple times?

[Triceron]

Do you not think this is a bit ironic when you pointed to the boys releasing info multiple times but won’t respond to him asking for any sort of evidence multiple times?

It's not worth my time to dig back 5+ years through articles for. And you haven't been arguing with Rhorle much, so I don't expect you to understand why providing sources for him is a waste of time.

[Rageonit]

It's not worth my time. You haven't been arguing with Rhorle much, so I don't expect you to understand why providing sources for him is a waste of time.

Then don't argue with him, because, if what you say is true, you make yourself look stupid.

[rhorle]

It's not worth my time to dig back 5+ years through articles for.

The Boys season 1 was 3 years ago in 2019.

[Triceron]

Then don't argue with him, because, if what you say is true, you make yourself look stupid.

C'mon man, practically half the pages of this entire thread are dedicated to my arguments with Rhorle, and you think that arguing him NOW will make me look stupid? I think that's a judgement people would have already made regardless of what I do moving forward, and this changes nothing.

Who are we kidding here? You think people think all that highly of anyone else here? The threshold for mutual respect here is quite low. If any of us are actually looking for deep conversation, we wouldn't be looking in the MMO-C off-topic threads for it.

[Rageonit]

C'mon man, practically half the pages of this entire thread are dedicated to my arguments with Rhorle, and you think that arguing him NOW will make me look stupid? I think that's a judgement people would have already made regardless of what I do moving forward, and this changes nothing.

I mean, yeah, the back and forth started to border on stupid long time ago - but if you choose to continue it, either do it in good faith and provide proof when he asks for one, or shut up. That's my take on it. You thinking low of him doesn't exempt you from the rules of a honest conversation, sorry.

[Triceron]

I mean, yeah, the back and forth started to border on stupid long time ago - but if you choose to continue it, either do it in good faith and provide proof when he asks for one, or shut up. That's my take on it. You thinking low of him doesn't exempt you from the rules of a honest conversation, sorry.

Who said I was having an honest conversation?

I mean, If I casually dropped a "Tolkien would roll in his grave", he'd reply asking me to provide a source for that. I'm not sure it'd need to be provided in good faith either. And I'm not opposed to slinging mud when it gets down to it. If I were really looking for better conversation I wouldn't even be here.

[Lorgar Aurelian]

It's not worth my time to dig back 5+ years through articles for. And you haven't been arguing with Rhorle much, so I don't expect you to understand why providing sources for him is a waste of time.

I mean that rather compounds the point that your the one being dishonest because of last experience with Rhorle.