and how do you know that?Yes, and many did.
Again, why is dishonest to think this? The idea of majority of the new prime subs in December is because a shit how like rings of power is far more dishonest than just thinking the obvious: people buy more stuff in Christmas.And some didn't. It's still dishonest of you to say 'they didn't.'
Im being an ass because i said "bad" things about the show, because i made some minor grammar error or because im saying the prime subs they got a month after the show aired have nothing to do with the show? you have to be more specificI'm being an ass to you because you're being an ass yourself, don't you worry.
"im not doing a strawman you are stupid and pathetic"That's also not what a strawman is, maybe actually educate yourself before throwing around random words you picked up on the web. Makes you look stupid.
And of course you can trashtalk about the show all you like. The way you're doing it is just simply pathetic.
- - - Updated - - -
The thing is, the show didn't make a success either.
What amazon say is a success is copium to not look bad, "minutes watched" is not a metric to say your show succeed, if public and critics(the ones you didn't bought) didn't praise, if there was not engagement from the audience and if you don't build a fandom, is a flop. Thats why every week someone from amazon come to say the amazon show didn't flop. Comparing with your example, The Kardashians have a fandom people actually engage on that. The only engagement RoP is having is people rosting and some trying to defend.
Many movie were able to pay themselves, they were still a flop and you don't see a sequence later.