Lord of the Rings TV Series Purchased by Amazon

[bledgor]

Changes and reinterpretations are REQUIRED to adapt a work from one medium to another. Try again.

Some changes, not literally deleting dozens of characters, adding half a dozen new characters, condensing thousands of years into a couple years, etc. There are so many fucking changes mate, so no try again.

Literally the only way you could argue otherwise is you don't give a single fuck about the lore, or you you hate Tolkien, so which is it?

[Dhrizzle]

The show being good/bad is up for debate, there is literally no debate that it is a bad adaptation, people have listed the dozens of changes from just the few minutes of they show they have released and interviews that are large changes from what Tolkien wrote.

The issue with judging on these merits is Tolkien published almost nothing about the Second Age and the vast amounts that were published posthumously show dramatically changing ideas around the characters and events involved. It isn't like the LotR movies where Jackson took a finished product and made changes to the tone and drastically changed some of the key characters.

What is clear is that the people writing this show have done their homework and most of the things being complained about by YouTubers can be justified somewhere in the text, or at the very least aren't directly contradicted (apart form the racism but that isn't worth engaging with.) The biggest risk is the changes to the timeline of the Second Age and how much it is being compressed, whether it will be justified by the final product and achieved without detracting too much from the theme.

[Evil Midnight Bomber]

The show being good/bad is up for debate, there is literally no debate that it is a bad adaptation

I'm going to call that one out too...because you are literally debating that it is a bad adaptation.

[s_bushido]

Then you have a few examples where the studio really tries to nail it for the existing audience instead (Top Gun comes to mind, I would probably also say Dune, and a lot of people say Cobra Kai is like this also, but I have not watched it) and behold, you have a massively successful product.

https://www.esquire.com/entertainmen...ferences-book/

“As a filmmaker, I’ve always been attracted by femininity, and in a lot of my movies the main protagonist is female,” Villeneuve said. “Femininity is there in the book, but I thought it should be up front. I said to [co-writers] Eric [Roth] and Jon [Spaihts], ‘We need to make sure that Lady Jessica is not an expensive extra.’ She’s such a beautiful and complex character.”

[...]

Following on his changes to Lady Jessica, Villeneuve made another move to foreground femininity: rewriting Dr. Liet Kynes, who viewers first meet as the Atreides arrive in the desert, as a woman. Readers of the novel will remember the character as a man appointed by the Imperium to act as the Judge of the Change, overseeing the hand-off of Arrakis from House Harkonnen to House Atreides. When Spaihts suggested gender-swapping the character, Villeneuve thought it was brilliant. “It doesn’t change the nature of the character,” Villeneuve said. “It just makes it closer to the world today, and more relevant and frankly more interesting.”

womp womp

Bolded is basically the exact same shit the showrunners have said about this, which dipshits are roasting them for sight-unseen.

[Xath]

well its 90-80/10-20 men to women in most modern armed forces. Bet the balance was alot closer to 50/50 in the ancient world out of necessity. Britons, Gaul, Scythian etc.

Pretty much the opposite unless literally defending the home. Women were largely treated as a resource to create more soldiers they absolutely would not he allowed on the front lines if at all possible.

[Dhrizzle]

Stealing a comment from Reddit:


But Legolas had flowing golden hair and a fair complexion, so it was a perfectly respectful no-scope sniping.

Completely justified! Tolkien only made war out to be a terrible endeavour because he lacked the language to adequately describe an elf surfing down an elephant as he kills it, and the Fellowship was only so serious because he couldn't think of the correct term to make a masturbation joke about the dwarf.

[Xath]

Yes, it wasn't for everyone. I'm in my 40s and every woman my age never saw it until they had young kids of their own, usually boys. Most of them said it's "one of those dumb movies about men and their swords." This is changing, as women become more involved in nerd culture, but that's a very recent development.

Ironically, I'd bet you'd be totally on board with the idea that romantic comedies are "for women" and alienate male audiences, while not understanding how high fantasy epics like LOTR do the same.

My mom literally read me the books starting with hobbit when I was around 5 because she loved them. Don't generalize.

[bledgor]

The issue with judging on these merits is Tolkien published almost nothing about the Second Age and the vast amounts that were published posthumously show dramatically changing ideas around the characters and events involved. It isn't like the LotR movies where Jackson took a finished product and made changes to the tone and drastically changed some of the key characters.

What is clear is that the people writing this show have done their homework and most of the things being complained about by YouTubers can be justified somewhere in the text, or at the very least aren't directly contradicted (apart form the racism but that isn't worth engaging with.) The biggest risk is the changes to the timeline of the Second Age and how much it is being compressed, whether it will be justified by the final product and achieved without detracting too much from the theme.

No where in ANY text was Galadrial a warrior, so was describe as an amazon, yes, but that doesn't mean a warrior, her only involvement in a battle was tearing down a fortress with magic. She was also married to Celeborn in this age, and they had children one of which was a daughter that married Elrond, we know this. She was one of the oldest Elves, we know this, older than Celebrimbor and Gal-Galad, yet in the show she is depicted as younger than them both, and "brash and full of piss and vinegar" which she certainly wasn't in this age as she was looking to rule in this age with her husband. No where in the text did she go to Numenor, or interact with the "queen reagent" Mireil (who never was queen reagent, she was supposed to be but got screwed over). Elrond was also the first one to suspect Anatar of being Sauron, not Galadrial.

That is some of the issues from text with ONE CHARACTER. I could go on, but why should I when neither you nor the show runners did your research.

[Xath]

Because the same people that complain about “inclusion” are the same people that can’t read more than 280 characters.

Also the ones who won't actually watch the stuff they want changed even after it is changed.

[bledgor]

I'm going to call that one out too...because you are literally debating that it is a bad adaptation.

I'm not, I am telling you why you are wrong, there is no debate unless you don't know the lore/Tolkien, or actively hate him/his work.

[s_bushido]

No where in ANY text was Galadrial a warrior, so was describe as an amazon, yes, but that doesn't mean a warrior, her only involvement in a battle was tearing down a fortress with magic.

lol...are you fucking kidding me? "Amazon" is literally synonymous with "warrior woman."

She was also married to Celeborn in this age, and they had children one of which was a daughter that married Elrond, we know this. She was one of the oldest Elves, we know this, older than Celebrimbor and Gal-Galad, yet in the show she is depicted as younger than them both

Is how they look relevant, when a defining characteristic of their species is that they essentially stop aging after reaching their prime? And given the connection between spirit and body that elves display, it's trivial to dismiss any incongruencies there as different people reaching that sort of maturity at different points.

Besides, Blanchett was younger than Clarkk is when filming the original trilogy... 10 years younger than her "son" Elrond.

[bledgor]

lol...are you fucking kidding me? "Amazon" is literally synonymous with "warrior woman."

No it isn't some take take it that way, but it doesn't matter BECAUSE SHE NEVER FOUGHT IN ANY OF HIS WORKS MINUS USING MAGIC.

lIs how they look relevant, when a defining characteristic of their species is that they essentially stop aging after reaching their prime? And given the connection between spirit and body that elves display, it's trivial to dismiss any incongruencies there as different people reaching that sort of maturity at different points.

Besides, Blanchett was younger than Clarkk is when filming the original trilogy... 10 years younger than her "son" Elrond.

Okay then why does Celebrimbor look like he could be her mother, why is she describes as brash and full of vinegar if they are supposed to be leaders and acting more maturely when she is older. Also while Blanchett might have been younger, she certainly didn't look like it, she looked like an ethereal 30(?) year old elf, meanwhile Clarkk looks like she is barely in her twenties, which would be okay if we were in the Time of the Trees and the rest of the elves younger than her looked as young as she did, but they don't instead again Celebrimbor (who was a suitor or hers btw) looks like her dad, and frankly so could Gil-Galad, both of who are YOUNGER than Galadrial.

Again you have nothing to disrupt any of my points other than vague tangents. You ignored the half a dozen of my other points to nit pick two things that aren't even incorrect. You obviously aren't a fan of Tolkien so no point continuing to talk to you.

Also Elrond wasn't her son, I know you have read 0 Tolkien lore, but Elrond is her SON-IN-LAW (he marries her daughter that she has with her still living husband Celeborn, someone who is rumors are right is dead in the show.).

[Veggie50]

No it isn't some take take it that way, but it doesn't matter BECAUSE SHE NEVER FOUGHT IN ANY OF HIS WORKS MINUS USING MAGIC.



Okay then why does Celebrimbor look like he could be her mother, why is she describes as brash and full of vinegar if they are supposed to be leaders and acting more maturely when she is older. Also while Blanchett might have been younger, she certainly didn't look like it, she looked like an ethereal 30(?) year old elf, meanwhile Clarkk looks like she is barely in her twenties, which would be okay if we were in the Time of the Trees and the rest of the elves younger than her looked as young as she did, but they don't instead again Celebrimbor (who was a suitor or hers btw) looks like her dad, and frankly so could Gil-Galad, both of who are YOUNGER than Galadrial.

Again you have nothing to disrupt any of my points other than vague tangents. You ignored the half a dozen of my other points to nit pick two things that aren't even incorrect. You obviously aren't a fan of Tolkien so no point continuing to talk to you.

Also Elrond wasn't her son, I know you have read 0 Tolkien lore, but Elrond is her SON-IN-LAW (he marries her daughter that she has with her still living husband Celeborn, someone who is rumors are right is dead in the show.).

In lotr frodo is in his 60’s, in PJ’s adaptation he appears slightly younger.

It’s an adaptation, not a transcription. There will be differences that the showrunners deem necessary to get the story across. It is literally art BASED on tolkien, not a 1:1 retelling.

If that doesn’t suit you, don’t watch it. I think I’m likely to thoroughly enjoy it ^^

[bledgor]

In lotr frodo is in his 60’s, in PJ’s adaptation he appears slightly younger.

It’s an adaptation, not a transcription. There will be differences that the showrunners deem necessary to get the story across. It is literally art BASED on tolkien, not a 1:1 retelling.

If that doesn’t suit you, don’t watch it. I think I’m likely to thoroughly enjoy it ^^

... IT isn't even close, I am not saying this will make it a bad or good show (I suspect bad, but whatever), I AM SAYING IT MAKES IT A BAD adaptation. It is fine for a race to look younger than humans/how we view ages, I get that, but it has to work the same relatively for the race. You can't have an elf that is older than two other elves, yet looks like their daughter/looks the same age as an elf thousands of years younger than her.

[Evil Midnight Bomber]

I'm not, I am telling you why you are wrong, there is no debate unless you don't know the lore/Tolkien, or actively hate him/his work.

You are telling people why you believe they are wrong. They are responding by telling you that they believe you are being premature.

That's the literal definition of a debate.

[bledgor]

You are telling people why you believe they are wrong. They are responding by telling you that they believe you are being premature.

That's the literal definition of a debate.

They are responding with things false/incorrect, I am stating things that are factually true, that you can look up/read the books to prove are right (so not my BELIEF as you want to try and frame it, FACTUALLY FUCKING TRUE, FEEL FREE TO LOOK IT UP). Just because people write some stupid incorrect shit doesn't make them right, but you and the others continue to defend factually wrong things in this shit tier adaptation.

Again you are free to "believe" (as you like to say) the story will be good, that is possible, but when almost everything they have shown is not how Tolkien wrote it you can't say it is a good adaptation.

[Evil Midnight Bomber]

They are responding with things false/incorrect, I am stating things that are factually true, that you can look up/read the books to prove are right (so not my BELIEF as you want to try and frame it, FACTUALLY FUCKING TRUE, FEEL FREE TO LOOK IT UP). Just because people write some stupid incorrect shit doesn't make them right, but you and the others continue to defend factually wrong things in this shit tier adaptation.

It is your BELIEF that the changes they have made to the "FACTUALLY FUCKING TRUE" things necessitate that this is automatically a bad adaptation.

[bledgor]

It is your BELIEF that the changes they have made to the "FACTUALLY FUCKING TRUE" things necessitate that this is automatically a bad adaptation.

... So you are daft, no point talking with you.

[Evil Midnight Bomber]

... So you are daft, no point talking with you.

I'm not the one debating something that apparently isn't a debate.

[Ashana Darkmoon]

https://www.esquire.com/entertainmen...ferences-book/


womp womp

Bolded is basically the exact same shit the showrunners have said about this, which dipshits are roasting them for sight-unseen.

What is this have to do with anything lol?

Generally speaking dune widely considered to be a great and spiritually authentic adaptation at least so far. I can't imagine anyone watching that movie and thinking it was an attempt to hijack it with new characters completely change important existing ones. Paul is..Paul.

If anything, this basically loops back to my point about how producers and whatnot want to be seen as good people, the amount of politics and negotiation and buzzwords you have to throw out to convince people in the media that you're doing certain things these days is nuts!