Originally Posted by Blizzard Entertainment
Without debating the significance of this statistic, I'd like to just point out:
The fact that more school children have been killed in 2018 than service members does not necessarily mean that they are more likely to be killed. So this is potentially misleading (not the data, the title).
For instance, if I got killed by lightning strike inside my house, it doesn't mean that lightning is a bigger threat than a heart attack for the other members in my household.
Hope that makes sense.
I don't think you get it. I will pull it to extremes to make it easier for you to understand - imagine there were real nazis who used 100% legit scientific methods to carry on their agenda, they just waited for right timespan to cherrypick up data ONLY from that short timespan that would prove their ideaology. Would you still support it? After all, it would be still 'scientifically accurate' - your words.
Something will happen eventually. It will take a well-known Republican politician or two having a child die in a school shooting. The demographic that doesn't give a shit about school shooting will stop ignoring it when it effects them.
- - - Updated - - -
Oh snap. Time to try the Hitler card, eh? Sorry, you simply fail.
Love when I can get to page 3 and see no one in support of it hasnt read the article.
"The figures for 2018 do not suggest schools are more dangerous than combat zones. After all, there are more than 50 million students in public elementary and high schools and only about 1.3 million members of the armed forces. So far in 2018, a member of the military has been about 40 times as likely to be killed as someone is to die in a school shooting, including Keller’s revised figures."
Lies, Damn Lies, Statistics.
Not only is it not safer to be in the military, the numbers arent accurate because the DoD wont release all the information in press releases. Just sensationalist shit to rile up the people.
Or once enough of Gen Z is in their 20s. The NRA would have a better chance long-term of holding on to more of their position if they were willing to have a dialogue about it. Digging in their heels, demonizing the children, and screeching reactionary rhetoric is more likely to provoke the type of extreme reaction they're so worried about than a more moderate one. Bend or break, the NRA is firmly choosing break.