Airbnb warns that it may expel 'Unite the Right' rally participants

[Machismo]

I'm defending the president's powers to ban whatever foreigners he wants.

Immigration to a foreign country isn't a human right. Not for Muslims, not for non-Muslims, not for blondes born in 1985, not for Trump, not for me, not for you. Not for anyone or any group.

Yes, you are defending fascism, I made that quite clear. The more you talk, the more you continue to make my case for me. Thanks.

Your hatred of freedom is noted.

[Travis B]

I'm defending the president's powers to ban whatever foreigners he wants. If you don't like it, then don't support him next election.

Immigration to a foreign country isn't a human right. Not for Muslims, not for non-Muslims, not for blondes born in 1985, not for Trump, not for me, not for you. Not for anyone or any group.

Either a country controls its borders or it doesn't.

He doesn't have the power to ban whoever he wants, and the courts told him so. That is a fact.

I'm not sure what country you're from, but the United States has a system of checks and balances. It seems that you think the Presidency should be a dictatorship instead. How very fascist of you.

[Deleted]

Yes, you are defending fascism, I made that quite clear. The more you talk, the more you continue to make my case for me. Thanks.

Your hatred of freedom is noted.

You don't know fascism at all. You're ignorant.

[Machismo]

You don't know fascism at all. You're ignorant.

Let's see, supporting the restriction of people based on religion, extreme nationalism, and ethnic cleansing... Yep, sounds like fascism to me.

[Deleted]

He doesn't have the power to ban whoever he wants, and the courts told him so. That is a fact.

I'm not sure what country you're from, but the United States has a system of checks and balances. It seems that you think the Presidency should be a dictatorship instead. How very fascist of you.

The lower courts (those not the Supreme Court) are often run by Democrat appointed activist judges which is why the Supreme Court allowed Trump's ban to stand, with some adjustments, but allowed to stand nonetheless.

An activist judge is a judge who rules on ideology rather than law and will twist the law to suit his ideology.

It's a pity really, if you want to be an activist judge, it's probably better to just not have a law degree LOL

[Travis B]

The lower courts (those not the Supreme Court) are often run by Democrat appointed activist judges which is why the Supreme Court allowed Trump's ban to stand, with some adjustments, but allowed to stand nonetheless.

An activist judge is a judge who rules on ideology rather than law and will twist the law to suit his ideology.

It's a pity really, if you want to be an activist judge, it's probably better to just not have a law degree LOL

Right, because the Supreme Court isn't run by Republican-appointed activist judges. It's clear that "activist judge" to you means any judge who makes a decision that you disagree with.

But anyways, onto the main point, you just admitted the Supreme Court made Trump adjust his ban. I guess he can't just ban whoever he wants like you claimed before, huh?

[Machismo]

The lower courts (those not the Supreme Court) are often run by Democrat appointed activist judges which is why the Supreme Court allowed Trump's ban to stand, with some adjustments, but allowed to stand nonetheless.

An activist judge is a judge who rules on ideology rather than law and will twist the law to suit his ideology.

It's a pity really, if you want to be an activist judge, it's probably better to just not have a law degree LOL

Can't the exact same be said for judges on the right? Yes, yes it can.

[Deleted]

Let's see, supporting the restriction of people based on religion, extreme nationalism, and ethnic cleansing... Yep, sounds like fascism to me.

I support the president's power over admission of aliens. I make no specific policy recommendation, although I certainly would restrict travel coming from countries I considered to be hostile based on the information given to me by the CIA and other agencies of that nature. I would also demand that they provide such information free of cultural marxist dogma. I would expect to be informed of how things are, not how leftists want them to be.

That's not extreme nationalism, that's just regular old nationalism. The interests of citizens and their safety is more important than the desire of someone to emigrate. If a country doesn't want you, tough luck, you have everywhere else to go. Stay in your country or pick another country that will take you.

Ethnic cleansing - absolute lie

And in general an obvious lie since the US was more nationalist in the past but actually fought fascism. You just want to slander anyone who's not for open borders as fascist.

[Deleted]

The police acting like the fash bodyguards.

[Machismo]

I support the president's power over admission of aliens. I make no specific policy recommendation, although I certainly would restrict travel coming from countries I considered to be hostile based on the information given to me by the CIA and other agencies of that nature. I would also demand that they provide such information free of cultural marxist dogma. I would expect to be informed of how things are, not how leftists want them to be.

That's not extreme nationalism, that's just regular old nationalism. The interests of citizens and their safety is more important than the desire of someone to emigrate. If a country doesn't want you, tough luck, you have everywhere else to go. Stay in your country or pick another country that will take you.

Ethnic cleansing - absolute lie

And in general an obvious lie since the US was more nationalist in the past but actually fought fascism. You just want to slander anyone who's not for open borders as fascist.

He said he wanted to keep out Muslims, he's keeping out Muslims... that's ethnic cleansing. Sure, it's slow, but it's doing the job he said he'd do, nonetheless. Yep, ethnic cleansing. And yes, Ben Shapiro also supports ethnic cleansing.

So, extreme nationalism, wanting to kick out Muslims, and prevent more from coming. Focusing on certain races and ethnicities...

Yep, that's fascism.

[Deleted]

Can't the exact same be said for judges on the right? Yes, yes it can.

The right has some activism but it is far closer to the ideals the US was founded on.

As far as I'm concerned, the left has been wrong on almost every major issue brought to the Supreme Court except when it involved sex.


A pity that they only reason they seem to support sexual freedom is because they think that's going to get people sick and damage society, they don't really care about freedom. The left is about control and subversion, even when they're right, they're right for the wrong reasons.

[Machismo]

The right has some activism but it is far closer to the ideals the US was founded on.

As far as I'm concerned, the left has been wrong on almost every major issue brought to the Supreme Court except when it involved sex.


A pity that they only reason they seem to support sexual freedom is because they think that's going to get people sick and damage society, they don't really care about freedom. The left is about control and subversion, even when they're right, they're right for the wrong reasons.

The United States was founded on the desire to be an authoritarian regime. They didn't want more taxes, Washington himself pushed taxation almost as soon as he got into office.

Immigration restrictions, the war on drugs, attempts to ban abortion, restricting abortion clinics, opposing free trade, the defense budget, supporting the limiting 4th, 5th, 6th, and 10th Amendments, tariffs, banning gay marriage... that's a lot of control and subversion.

"A pity that they only reason they seem to support sexual freedom is because they think that's going to get people sick and damage society"

What the fuck does that even mean? It's either completely inane, or one of the most idiotic statements I have ever read from an adult. I'll let you pick which it was.

[Deleted]

people should be able to refuse service to anyone for any reason, so i have no problem with this. including those that dont want to serve gays, whites, men, jews, etc.

I have to agree with this - It's their home after-all..

Companies should be careful about excluding costumers because of their beliefs though...

[Deleted]

He said he wanted to keep out Muslims, he's keeping out Muslims... that's ethnic cleansing. Sure, it's slow, but it's doing the job he said he'd do, nonetheless. Yep, ethnic cleansing. And yes, Ben Shapiro also supports ethnic cleansing.

So, extreme nationalism, wanting to kick out Muslims, and prevent more from coming. Focusing on certain races and ethnicities...

Yep, that's fascism.

No, it isn't ethnic cleansing because:

1. People already in the country legally and especially citizens can't be kicked out.
2. Islam isn't an ethnicity it's a religion/ideology. I could make an equally nonsensical claim that leftists want to ethnically cleanse rightists
3. Keeping out isn't ethnic cleansing. If you were never there in the first place, there is nothing to "cleanse".

Just to point out how ridiculous this statement is, you would claim that if tomorrow 300 million Americans all wanted to move to Poland, and Poland rejected that proposal, they're committing ethnic cleansing of Americans... That's retarded. You're not entitled to enter a country without their permission.

[Machismo]

No, it isn't ethnic cleansing because:

1. People already in the country legally and especially citizens can't be kicked out.
2. Islam isn't an ethnicity it's a religion/ideology. I could make an equally nonsensical claim that leftists want to ethnically cleanse rightists
3. Keeping out isn't ethnic cleansing.

Just to point out how ridiculous this statement is, you would claim that if tomorrow 300 million Americans all wanted to move to Poland, and Poland rejected that proposal, they're committing ethnic cleansing of Americans... That's retarded. You're not entitled to enter a country without their permission.

But they can be oppressed. Period. It's a matter of breeding them out.

If you can point out how leftists want to ethnically cleanse, be my guest. I'm not a leftist, so I would love to see that argument.

But hey, I'm sure I'm about to hear about white genocide, so please continue.

[Deleted]

The United States was founded on the desire to be an authoritarian regime. They didn't want more taxes, Washington himself pushed taxation almost as soon as he got into office.

Immigration restrictions, the war on drugs, attempts to ban abortion, restricting abortion clinics, opposing free trade, the defense budget, supporting the limiting 4th, 5th, 6th, and 10th Amendments, tariffs, banning gay marriage... that's a lot of control and subversion.

"A pity that they only reason they seem to support sexual freedom is because they think that's going to get people sick and damage society"

What the fuck does that even mean? It's either completely inane, or one of the most idiotic statements I have ever read from an adult. I'll let you pick which it was.

It's well known that they left tends to be more pro-freedom when it comes to sex and drugs.

The sexual revolution was done by leftist radicals.

Gay sex was decriminalized with leftist help.

There's a chance maybe prostitution will be decriminalized too with leftist judges, at least if leftists reject the radfem anti-male bullshit they've been in full retard mode for the past 3 years.


While I certainly support more sex for more people and don't think the old norms are viable, it's also become pretty obvious that leftists (the true believers, not the moderates) only support sexual freedom because they think it will spread STDs more, damage the family (when people don't have families they instinctively turn to government for support leading to big government policies such as welfare for single moms and 15$ min wage everywhere) and damage society. Their intentions are not to spread more freedom, they just want people sick, hopefully dependent on their healthcare too.

[Machismo]

It's well known that they left tends to be more pro-freedom when it comes to sex and drugs.

The sexual revolution was done by leftist radicals.

Gay sex was decriminalized with leftist help.

There's a chance maybe prostitution will be decriminalized too with leftist judges, at least if leftists reject the radfem anti-male bullshit they've been in full retard mode for the past 3 years.


While I certainly support more sex for more people and don't think the old norms are viable, it's also become pretty obvious that leftists (the true believers, not the moderates) only support sexual freedom because they think it will spread STDs more, damage the family (when people don't have families they instinctively turn to government for support leading to big government policies such as welfare for single moms and 15$ min wage everywhere) and damage society. Their intentions are not to spread more freedom, they just want people sick, hopefully dependent on their healthcare too.

You tried to say the goal was to get people sick and damage society. You went full retard.

Seriously, that is some Alex Jones level conspiracy nonsense.

[omglaserzpewpew]

I support the president's power over admission of aliens. I make no specific policy recommendation, although I certainly would restrict travel coming from countries I considered to be hostile based on the information given to me by the CIA and other agencies of that nature. I would also demand that they provide such information free of cultural marxist dogma. I would expect to be informed of how things are, not how leftists want them to be.

That's not extreme nationalism, that's just regular old nationalism. The interests of citizens and their safety is more important than the desire of someone to emigrate. If a country doesn't want you, tough luck, you have everywhere else to go. Stay in your country or pick another country that will take you.

Ethnic cleansing - absolute lie

And in general an obvious lie since the US was more nationalist in the past but actually fought fascism. You just want to slander anyone who's not for open borders as fascist.

From what I understand, the ban is to cut down the ability of terrorists to enter the US, correct? The countries affected are: Libya, Iran, Somalia, Syria, Yemen, North Korea, and Venezuela. Okay, that's a good start, but if your goal is to be effective at protecting the US why aren't we including other notable hot spots for terrorism on that list? Notably absent is Saudi Arabia, which if you recall, was home to 15 of the the 19 terrorists from 9/11.

If you think critically about the purported goal of this policy, the way it is being executed can only lead to the conclusion that keeping American citizens safe is NOT Trump's real goal here. Several of the countries that SHOULD be on a list like this but AREN'T have something in common - Trump has real estate investments in all of them. The corruption and duplicity is so obvious here, that people of both parties should be spitting fire. The fact that Republicans in Washington have decided to abandon our nation's principles and rally behind Trump is something that should be concerning everyone.

[Deleted]

You tried to say the goal was to get people sick and damage society. You went full retard.

Seriously, that is some Alex Jones level conspiracy nonsense.

Leftist subversion is well known, read about the Frankfurt School. Alex Jones has nothing to do with this. Attempts by leftist radicals to undermine western civilization has been a thing for decades and well known before Alex Jones was even born.

Another radical using deception is Saul Alinsky. He literally wrote a propaganda manual for the far left Rules for Radicals. You display many of those traits too which is why I've long believed you're a leftist. Half the time you make statements that only a far leftist would make, the other half you make outrageous "libertarian" statements that are more a parody of the ideology than anything, almost as if you're deliberately trying to make people hate libertarians.

KGB defector Yuri Bezmenov also exposed how the Soviet propaganda machine used leftist useful idiots to undermine the west.

It's ultimately why you have more broken families today, bigger government and the phenomenon of SJWism.

[Machismo]

Leftist subversion is well known, read about the Frankfurt School. Alex Jones has nothing to do with this. Attempts by leftist radicals to undermine western civilization has been a thing for decades and well known before Alex Jones was even born.

Another radical using deception is Saul Alinsky. He literally wrote a propaganda manual for the far left Rules for Radicals. You display many of those traits too which is why I've long believed you're a leftist. Half the time you make statements that only a far leftist would make, the other half you make outrageous "libertarian" statements that are more a parody of the ideology than anything, almost as if you're deliberately trying to make people hate libertarians.

You just tried to argue that the desire to have more sexual freedom is about spreading disease in the eyes of the leftists. Once again, that is a moronic conspiracy theory. Something tells me that you have no ability to actually back it up with any factual evidence.

As for me, I support individual liberty, limited government and the fee markets. That is very clear. If you consider those "far leftist" beliefs, that's just too bad for you.

It's weird, I thought conservatives were supposed to support those things. I guess not. Thanks for finally admitting that conservatives oppose such things.