Warfronts should have been PVP

[Bane-Thunder-God]

A lot of people run them that wouldn't run them as PVP. Personally a better solution would have been to make both PVE/PVP versions and let people choose. We'll see if they continue to iterate on them going forward.

Oddly enough I always wanted a PVE version of Ashran with world bosses and stuff.

I do agree with this, there should be both options.

Although I'd add that they use similar AI to that being used in Island expeditions to really give Warfronts more of a kick. We're now getting a BG with AI enemies so it will be interesting to see how this goes down.

[Tekkommo]

How many raids did warfronts cost us?

[Magnagarde]

They shouldn't have been exclusively PvP.

They however should have a PvP mode.

[unbound]

It's fairly obvious why they are so mundane with only NPC's as enemies.

If we go back to Wintergrasp, Tol Barad, Ashran, these were Warfronts by other names but heavily focused PvP. They were more interesting then these current iterations even though people complained about those warfronts, making it Purely PVE ain't so fun now is it?

Warfronts were a cheap way to add content. They took MoP scenarios and made it larger is all...warfronts take *substantilly* less effort to build and maintain than the previous PvP zones (this is one of the many ways Blizz was able to report such a massive cut in costs as reported in their financials yesterday).

[Satelliteyears0o]

It's fairly obvious why they are so mundane with only NPC's as enemies.

If we go back to Wintergrasp, Tol Barad, Ashran, these were Warfronts by other names but heavily focused PvP. They were more interesting then these current iterations even though people complained about those warfronts, making it Purely PVE ain't so fun now is it?

They definitely tried, the execution wasnt all there tho. Still, its content and at least they can only improve if they choose to move forward with warfronts.