Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst
1
2
3
  1. #41
    Quote Originally Posted by Bane-Thunder-God View Post
    Which is why they were much better as PVP focused events cause you couldn't simply just AFK cause losing meant not reaping the rewards. Tol'Barad was the best for this. I hope we get another Tol'barad in future. You had to earn your spoils.
    Actually, Tol Barad would make WAY more sense in current expansion that it did in Cataclysm. From one side,Horde wants to capture a stretegic point,that would be close to Stormwind,from the other - Kul Tirans want to reclaim their territory.

  2. #42
    Quote Originally Posted by Felixon View Post
    Actually, Tol Barad would make WAY more sense in current expansion that it did in Cataclysm. From one side,Horde wants to capture a stretegic point,that would be close to Stormwind,from the other - Kul Tirans want to reclaim their territory.
    Spot on, the faction war theme of this expansion is possibly the best fit for a Tol'barad like warfront. It just makes sense in every way.

  3. #43
    they have pvp warfronts, i think they're called battlegrounds
    No sense crying over spilt beer, unless you're drunk...

  4. #44
    Quote Originally Posted by MoanaLisa View Post
    A lot of people run them that wouldn't run them as PVP. Personally a better solution would have been to make both PVE/PVP versions and let people choose. We'll see if they continue to iterate on them going forward.

    Oddly enough I always wanted a PVE version of Ashran with world bosses and stuff.
    I do agree with this, there should be both options.

    Although I'd add that they use similar AI to that being used in Island expeditions to really give Warfronts more of a kick. We're now getting a BG with AI enemies so it will be interesting to see how this goes down.

  5. #45
    How many raids did warfronts cost us?

  6. #46
    They shouldn't have been exclusively PvP.

    They however should have a PvP mode.

  7. #47
    The Lightbringer Daish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    3,295
    they should of been server vs server PvP content and a way to rank servers vs each other

  8. #48
    Quote Originally Posted by Bane-Thunder-God View Post
    It's fairly obvious why they are so mundane with only NPC's as enemies.

    If we go back to Wintergrasp, Tol Barad, Ashran, these were Warfronts by other names but heavily focused PvP. They were more interesting then these current iterations even though people complained about those warfronts, making it Purely PVE ain't so fun now is it?
    Warfronts were a cheap way to add content. They took MoP scenarios and made it larger is all...warfronts take *substantilly* less effort to build and maintain than the previous PvP zones (this is one of the many ways Blizz was able to report such a massive cut in costs as reported in their financials yesterday).

  9. #49
    Quote Originally Posted by Bane-Thunder-God View Post
    It's fairly obvious why they are so mundane with only NPC's as enemies.

    If we go back to Wintergrasp, Tol Barad, Ashran, these were Warfronts by other names but heavily focused PvP. They were more interesting then these current iterations even though people complained about those warfronts, making it Purely PVE ain't so fun now is it?
    They definitely tried, the execution wasnt all there tho. Still, its content and at least they can only improve if they choose to move forward with warfronts.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •