Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst
1
2
  1. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by Shnider View Post
    My honest opinion here.
    I was a liberal for most of my life, and (still) I truly believe that everyone is allowed to make whatever decision that makes them happy. However, my support stops the moment it affects other people. Psychologists & social scientists nearly agree that a child raised in a stereotype family (father & mother) does a lot better than a child raised in a family of gay or lesbian couple. i will edit the post later for source
    I have no doubt this post will receive a lot of flames. One thing you should actually realize is even if what you said is true, it's also irrelevant. You'd rather a kid remain in foster care than go to a loving home where the adopting parents are gay? Because there are more foster kids than there are adopting parents. Likewise, unless a homosexual couple is actually negatively impactful for a kid, using this "they're not as good" argument is utterly inexcusable. You want to deny an entire group a certain right over something as trivial as a relativistic argument? Seriously. You need to reconsider what you've said. Because it's little more than soft bigotry. Unless there is legitimate reason to think a homosexual couple will always be incapable and possibly even dangerous to the well being of a child, your excuse here holds no ground.

  2. #22
    Technically, the idea of jus sanguinis citizenship requiring sanguinis (biological) link seems reasonable.

    But in this day and age, it is just petty.

  3. #23
    Quote Originally Posted by Shnider View Post
    My honest opinion here.
    I was a liberal for most of my life, and (still) I truly believe that everyone is allowed to make whatever decision that makes them happy. However, my support stops the moment it affects other people. Psychologists & social scientists nearly agree that a child raised in a stereotype family (father & mother) does a lot better than a child raised in a family of gay or lesbian couple. i will edit the post later for source

    Same thing happened when Canada wanted to introduce compelled speech to address transgenders as they or ze. I thought it was dumb as fuck and they deserved the backlash they got.

    I will repeat before I get flamed into oblivion, I have nothing against homosexual couples and encourage them to do whatever makes them happy. But to have them adopt children that could otherwise be adopted by typical families is not a smart move.

    As for OP, for trump to deny them citizenship is a dumb decision and makes no sense.
    Yeah, that's a load of bullshit. Studies have found that what is most important for a child is to be raised in a STABLE family, rather than heterosexual couples being magically better parents than a gay couple.
    "If you are ever asking yourself 'Is Trump lying or is he stupid?', the answer is most likely C: All of the Above" - Seth Meyers

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •