Poor alliance has to be bribed to even turn on pvp.
How dare a newly added patch-quest be crowded by a lot of people? Of course the majority will kill other faction.
Didn't blizzard say they changed sharding so one faction didn't outnumber the other?
That is literally impossible. If you have 300 Horde and 200 Alliance, and shards suppport 50 then there is no way to have perfect balance. You either do 50 horde in each shard with 0 alliance on 2 shards, 50 horde per shard and 30-ish alliance on each shard, or balance a few and imbalance others. Then, throw in the LFG tool throwing the balance out of whack for every single raid boss zoning in 20-30 extra H or A to a shard.
who has the fabulous idea to enable warmode doing a quest EVERY hunter is doing right now?
You turned it on. Why did you turn it on if you don't want the risk that comes with it? Just turn it off.
Then we can get Against Overwhelming Odds again next week.
"I have the most loyal fanboys. Did you ever see that? Where I could stand by Thoradin's Wall and massacre my own people and I wouldn't lose any fanboys. It's like incredible." - Sylvanas Windrunner
"If you kill your enemies, they win." - Anduin Wrynn
How stupid so you have to be? Get ganked 30 v 1 (I suspect in your case it is probably 1v1). Logoff for 30 mins. Get ganked 21v1. Logoff again for 30 mins...
OR
Get ganked 30v1. Goto rest area. TURN WM off. Do quest.
It is a no brainer.
- - - Updated - - -
Horde tears on the forums was the best bribe blizzard could give.
”I can't do anything cause the alliance keeps killing me.”
So tasty.
i think there should be zero perks at all for either side with war mode. you either want to do world pvp, or you don't. no reason there needs to be any reward, although if blizzard wanted to reward wpvp kills with something like conquest or honor, or marks of honor, that would be ok.
>people expecting world PvP to be balanced
o i am laffin
top guild member
multi gladiator
giving wow insight daily - expert in wow
Alternatively instead of complaining you could just disable it.
Yes there were a lot of alliance in that one location. Unless you're completely pants-on-head stupid you'll understand that one place in the game is not equal to the entire warmode balance. Is that seriously what you're trying to say?
People crying about pvp in 2019 when all servers are now effectively pve servers. New wow meme is born
No offense, but you know it’s going to be a bottleneck of Hunters doing this quest. Knowing full well you’re going into an area where there’s bound to be many enemies is just ignorant.
One of 2 things was going to happen. What happened to you, or the opposite where your faction is dominant.
Except when I was there earlier when it was busted (anyone who did Storm Peaks up to Thorim's abduction wouldn't see him) People were being civil as hell. Everyone was just sitting there peacefully because we're all there just to get our pet.
- - - Updated - - -
Bullshit, as Horde they're usually the ones doing the outnumbering.
This. And every invasion. And the tortollan spots. And pretty much anywhere where it's given both an alliance and horde wq. But sure, "it's just one location"
That's pure bullshit and you know it.
And here's why.
1) Even if you go by their bonuses. Alliance is getting 15%, Horde's getting 10% which means there's more Horde than alliance.
2) Even had gotten 30% for a bit and we got the 1 week of a piece of 400 gear Ion stated that the gap was only halved. And only then after the Horde complaints did the % get dropped.
Last edited by DotEleven; 2019-03-14 at 05:42 PM.
Even at 1:1 ratios of players, you will never be able to avoid situations like this, unless you restrict player movement or annoy people with forcing them to phase even harder (as in too bad you want to group with these people, there is too many of your faction in that section of the world right now!).
So yeah, 15% is probably not a significant (!) enough difference to matter, when your baseline "unfairness"/randomness is as high as world pvp usually is.
"And all those exclamation marks, you notice? Five?
A sure sign of someone who wears his underpants on his head."