Dating, Life, Children.

[Doctor Amadeus]

@Doctor Amadeus Not intending to show a lack of respect for your personal ideas, but isn't this phrased in pretty ageist terms? Advanced age is shown as a limit, youth isn't addressed at all. Why focus on age as a negative? Not everyone is in the same state financially, in terms of the stability of their relationship, or even as far as health at the same age. While I understand age gets used as a rule of thumb for all of those, why not look directly at a person's circumstances?

You're right, and make very valid points. Age here is meant to be a biological outline, it isn't my intention to suggest precisely any age anyone should be, but to simply ask about a consensus. However you are right, it is ageist. I apologize that wasn't my intention.

My personal answer is more of a personal reflection for myself. and my opinion

[shadowmouse]

@Doctor Amadeus No problem. No offense taken and none intended, there just aren't a lot of guys my age and older on the forums so I wanted to throw out another view.

[Doctor Amadeus]

@Doctor Amadeus No problem. No offense taken and none intended, there just aren't a lot of guys my age and older on the forums so I wanted to throw out another view.

Thank you, and I appreciate you saying something, I sure didn't want to open the door to that kind of bigotry. I do not support that kind of ignorance or stupidity. It for sure is circumstances not age that should determine when it's healthy and perfectly capable for human beings have kids.

[nymphetsss]

So if you're over 30 and single you should just roll over and die? What an odd idea.

yeah that's what i was thinking, should all singles over 30 report to the sleepshop before they send a sandman?