Classic and the possible death of current

[Eleccybubb]

And your point being.. what exactly?
If you don't like it, then move on out of the Classic forum.

As I've already explained, you aren't the demographic for Classic and any arguments you have are in the end completely pointless, a waste of space if you will.
Blizzard will still make the project, people will still play the game for a LONG time, regardless of how upset you are over the fact that people might enjoy something.

As I said I'll never understand this obsession with not wanting to Classic to succeed.

I mean 200k or 2 mil subs it's money either way and a healthy community.

[Clozer]

And your point being.. what exactly?
If you don't like it, then move on out of the Classic forum.

As I've already explained, you aren't the demographic for Classic and any arguments you have are in the end completely pointless, a waste of space if you will.
Blizzard will still make the project, people will still play the game for a LONG time, regardless of how upset you are over the fact that people might enjoy something.

I'll even play it myself. Just like i played KH or God of War. But at one point there won't be anything for me to do and i'll certainly stop playing. I dont try to make it worse for anyone else. If you wanna do the same content for 10 years nobody will stop you.

[Fascinate]

As I said I'll never understand this obsession with not wanting to Classic to succeed.

I mean 200k or 2 mil subs it's money either way and a healthy community.

Id assume most of it comes from people not understanding how small of a team classic has, and that it has zero effect on retail development. Ive seen so many of these comments that is the only conclusion i can draw.

[Gungnir]

As I said I'll never understand this obsession with not wanting to Classic to succeed.

I mean 200k or 2 mil subs it's money either way and a healthy community.

Considering a certain popular non-sanctioned server had 150k concurrent accounts active, I think Classic will punch way above that.
Of course, estimation is impossible but there'll be quite a few people.
And yeah, even if it "only" has 200k players, that's still more than enough for Blizz.

I'll even play it myself. Just like i played KH or God of War. But at one point there won't be anything for me to do and i'll certainly stop playing. I dont try to make it worse for anyone else. If you wanna do the same content for 10 years nobody will stop you.

Why are you talking in absolutes?
Secondly, we've been doing the same content for 14 years on retail. Appearances may be different, but it's functionally the same game in every system that makes up WoW. The only difference is they've removed most of the RPG elements and thrown in QoL elements instead.

I've just never understood people who are so inherently fucking salty over people wanting to play a certain game, to go "YEAH WELL WHY DON'T YOU MARRY IT AND PLAY FOR 400 YEARS STRAIGHT, SEE HOW YOU LIKE IT?"
Like what the fuck is that argument?

[cuafpr]

maybe at first as some people try it.. but i suspect a lot of the newer players in WoW will miss the conveniences and not even realize how many they have till they are gone.

[Frostyfire14]

Everyone is completely over-rating Classic. It's a terrible game. And I've played WoW since May 2005. It will not kill any other game, including its sister LIVE server.

[deceptacon1]

I am someone who is excited and waiting to play classic wow and I never even purchased this most recent expansion.

I know many of my friends (we all played since vanilla) also want to play.

This is a small sample pool, but my suspicion is that many people who want to play Vanilla are not people that will necessarily play live.

So Blizzard will certainly get older plays to sub who never intended to sub for retail with the release of vanilla which I think is great for the game in general.

[Gungnir]

Everyone is completely over-rating Classic. It's a terrible game. And I've played WoW since May 2005. It will not kill any other game, including its sister LIVE server.

I'll also never understand how people try to pass off a subjective, anecdotal opinion as facts somehow.
Facetious at best.

[Clozer]

Considering a certain popular non-sanctioned server had 150k concurrent accounts active, I think Classic will punch way above that.
Of course, estimation is impossible but there'll be quite a few people.
And yeah, even if it "only" has 200k players, that's still more than enough for Blizz.




Why are you talking in absolutes?
Secondly, we've been doing the same content for 14 years on retail. Appearances may be different, but it's functionally the same game in every system that makes up WoW. The only difference is they've removed most of the RPG elements and thrown in QoL elements instead.

I've just never understood people who are so inherently fucking salty over people wanting to play a certain game, to go "YEAH WELL WHY DON'T YOU MARRY IT AND PLAY FOR 400 YEARS STRAIGHT, SEE HOW YOU LIKE IT?"
Like what the fuck is that argument?

Classic is limited and not expanding. Please face that fact.

[Gungnir]

Classic is limited and not expanding. Please face that fact.

So instead of actually trying to read a post, you're doubling back to something that has already been discussed ad nauseum in this subsection?
What do you achieve with this?
You are just wasting peoples time and your own by posting this inane shit.

Also, please point out where I refuted that fact. Please do.
I'm dying to see where I specifically, word for word, refuted that. In any way.
Go on, I am waiting.

[Clozer]

So instead of actually trying to read a post, you're doubling back to something that has already been discussed ad nauseum in this subsection?
What do you achieve with this?
You are just wasting peoples time and your own by posting this inane shit.

It's a good point to why classic won't be the "possible death of current". But then again you said classic and retail offer the same content. The best thing to do is to put you on ignore to save me indeed a bunch of wasted time.

[Gungnir]

It's a good point to why classic won't be the "possible death of current". But then again you said classic and retail offer the same content. The best thing to do is to put you on ignore to save me indeed a bunch of wasted time.

Are you somehow implying that the inherent systems and gameplay are radically different from older WoW expansions?
Wow I was completely unaware that we've moved away from the MMO model in that case, you're the first one that has recognized this. Kudos.

Also, please point out where I have, specifically, said that Classic will be the death of current WoW.
Just because I am in the thread doesn't mean that I am agreeing with what's being posted, but I guess asking for someone to have any modicum of reading comprehension is far too much to ask out of someone incapable of having an argument in the first place.


Quick suggestion, if you're just going to be a willfully obtuse contrarian, just get some fresh air and get out of the Classic section.

[GrinnersGrin]

BFA killed it before Classic even came out kek

[Ielenia]

Three facts are certain. 10's of millions have come and gone since 2004. They left for many reasons, at least ONE person left because they thing modern WoW sucks. It is likely, that since the current game and the original game are so different that there are others (perhaps numbering in the millions) who also left for the same reason.

So there are millions of people who are potential customers for Classic for a variety of reasons.

The conclusion doesn't follow the premises. Having "at least one person leaving because they don't like modern WoW" does not translate to "there are millions of people who are potential customers for Classic". Could there be "millions"? Yes. Just as much as there could be just... a "few dozen".

Second fact? NONE of these people are playing BfA.

That's not a fact. You're making an absolute statement that can easily be unmade through anecdotal evidence. For example, I could say that someone in my guild only plays WoW because he has a lot of friends in the guild he likes to hang out with.

So while those 10's of millions only MIGHT return to play Clasic, it is for sure they didn't return for BfA.

Again, this conclusion doesn't follow ANY of your premises. It's delusional to think that "tens of millions" of players might return to play Classic WoW.

[Cyanu]

So since classic requires a bigger time investement than current wow (for casuals atleast) and since you can only play one game at a time.

I was wondering if once classic is released and everyone and their mothers will be playing it.. won't it have a negative effect on current wow playerbase and ingame activity ?

Classic still requires a sub to current wow to be played so the blizzard numbers won't realistically show who is playing what but i think Blizz might actually accidentally schoot current wow in the foot by dividing the playerbase.

I'm not waiting for wow to die in any form nor do i think it will truly die anytime soon, but with all mmo's released since launch i believe that Wow classic has the biggest chance to do what has been repeated on these forums each time a compareable mmo releases.

Will blizzard be able to convince us to play the xpac after bfa instead of classic ? for now i don't think so.


Update: Given the answers, classic wow might be the thing current retail needs to fill in the content gaps between patches and expansions.
Both of them being on the same sub might even be a blessing instead of a curse.

Thanks for the answers and sorry if i triggered anyone with my now only 3 posts

because the majority will naturally prefer to replay old content over new one, especially when they start introducing the shiny new features of the next expansions... new hero classes, new races, return of the Lich King? nah, i'll just stick to my water drinking,frostbolt spamming mage... 1 button rotation ftw

classic is here to gap BfA and the next xpac, after this very few will remain

[Ielenia]

Yeaaa that's down to your reading comprehension, no where did i say that those 10's of million's would return, merely its a far larger pool of people to draw from than the current retail playerbase.

Go and re-read what you wrote:

Classic is for the 10's of millions of people who have played this game since 2004 and quit

You said that Classic WoW is being made for those "tens of millions of people". You're heavily implying that the reason those "tens of millions" of people left the game was because "it's no longer vanilla".

Not to mention that "tens of millions of people who played since 2004" is just wrong, considering the highest peak vanilla WoW ever had was just around 8 mil, by the way.

[Hubbl3]

There will be a staggered release of content over a period of almost 18months according to Blizzard.

And I would not be surprised to see TBC classic announced at Blizzcon 2020, if Vanilla is a success.

So we end up with a "classic BFA by 2030"? Or do you think Blizz will keep all iterations of WoW running at the same time?

[Fascinate]

Go and re-read what you wrote:

You said that Classic WoW is being made for those "tens of millions of people". You're heavily implying that the reason those "tens of millions" of people left the game was because "it's no longer vanilla".

Not to mention that "tens of millions of people who played since 2004" is just wrong, considering the highest peak vanilla WoW ever had was just around 8 mil, by the way.

The main point here is that classic does not have to rely on the current WoW playerbase to maintain a healthy population, as is insinuated on these forums regularly. People are going to be trying out classic for a wide variety of reasons, but id say the top of that list will be returning players who do in fact miss the style WoW had from vanilla>wrath.

[toffmcsoft]

It was about limited content. It doesnt matter if it takes 1 month or 6. Ok it's not expanding - it's limited that's the point to make. Idiots everywhere.

If you're playing Classic wow for Raid content then you're obviously playing the wrong game. Raiding in classic is a bi-product of the game. Classic is about the community and the fun of PLAYING a game with others in a realm community. Raiding in classic is only 1 form of the entertainment.

- - - Updated - - -

So we end up with a "classic BFA by 2030"? Or do you think Blizz will keep all iterations of WoW running at the same time?

I think Blizzard is going to develop an alternative content path and that will be determined by the success of classic.
Classic will end with Classic. I see Blizzard using Classic to fill the void between retail & the next expansion to keep numbers up.

I wouldn't be surprised if the next expansion is MASSIVE, almost as if it was WOW 2.
The next expansion more then likely will bring back the grass roots of an mmo and take 2-3 years to develop.

[Fascinate]

If you're playing Classic wow for Raid content then you're obviously playing the wrong game. Raiding in classic is a bi-product of the game. Classic is about the community and the fun of PLAYING a game with others in a realm community. Raiding in classic is only 1 form of the entertainment.

^^This guy gets it.

Seriously its incredible how many people on this forum never played actual vanilla, raids were always the cherry on top, it was only the driving force for a very small % of people as compared to the majority today. I am not going to tell people how to enjoy a game, but i will point out that if you think raids are the most important part of vanilla, you have been tainted by years of retail brainwashing.