Hey, let's bring up something completely different and compare it with this?
If you're going that route you must also be in favor of sentencing people who caused someone to fall ill because of their choice to not vaccinate.
Come to think of it, you can't be against abortion for the sake of saving a life and also be against vaccination actually threatening the lives of babies.
I'm quite interested in where universalism vs particularism lines go for different people.
That is one of solutions, sure, if you consider jail to be fitting punishment for endangering other people in any way. Which i don't.If you're going that route you must also be in favor of sentencing people who caused someone to fall ill because of their choice to not vaccinate.
Maybe jailing is just easier to legislate in Alabama for whatever reason.
Edit: After checking, people already do get jailed for refusing to vaccinate in US
People are focusing on "their body, their choice" aspect though, not "saving a life" (because, clearly, baby carried to term rather then aborted is "saving a life" even if fetus status is dubious).Come to think of it, you can't be against abortion for the sake of saving a life and also be against vaccination actually threatening the lives of babies.
Last edited by Shalcker; 2019-05-15 at 10:18 AM.
Just as a reminder, the reason the Alabama Republicans have done this is to force the SCOTUS to reconsider Roe v. Wade. It's intentionally insane for that sole reason. This makes it not only scary for women in Alabama, but potentially many other states as well (except perhaps California as noted above).
Republicans are straight becoming the Taliban.
Resident Cosplay Progressive
So you get more prison time for aborting a fetus that is the product of rape than the rapist himself?
Might as well rename the US to Protostant republic of America
- - - Updated - - -
Being rich is also a sin in the bible, but hey, that would mean picking the parts they cant controll woman with.
Say what you want about Karl Rove he actually knew his stuff. He saw the writing on the wall and noticed that Latinos would be the perfect fit for a new Republican base. Too bad all the other Republicans decided to throw that away and pretty much making a 70/30 split at best for the foreseeable future (although it slowly going back to 75/25 it seems) in the largest growing demographic.
You see it's simple, anti lifers changed the argument to women's rights because they don't want to admit they are killing undborn children, it just sounds better. Pro Lifers, men and women, see it as protecting an unborn life and nothing to do with women's rights.
You can make an argument that an unborn child is not a life, that's a fair debate but don't be dishonest in ones like this.
Yes, everyone knows that pro-birthers don't consider the rights of women to be even slightly important. That is why you don't understand that whether or not the fetus is a "life" is largely irrelevant to whether or not a woman should have the right to decide what happens to her body.