They don't like those either. They want to instead demand fictional medical procedures in those cases.
They don't like those either. They want to instead demand fictional medical procedures in those cases.
Warning : Above post may contain snark and/or sarcasm. Try reparsing with the /s argument before replying.
What the world has learned is that America is never more than one election away from losing its goddamned mindMe on Elite : Dangerous | My WoW charactersOriginally Posted by Howard Tayler
Is it me picking nonsensical stances apart that is absurd, or is it the nonsensical stances themselves that are in fact absurd, for me to pick them apart on their contradictions so easily? If one believes abortion is murdering babies, then no sort of bad excuse is going to change that. If they start making excuses on why it's ok in some cases, then it directly contradicts the entire core point. And after that, their entire argument is worth nothing at all, because they already crossed their own sacred argument that they've used to justify their actions in the first place.
And yeah, there are pacifists who wouldn't resort to violence or killing even in self defense, so that example of yours doesn't hold up. In fact it makes my point for me: you can't call yourself pacifist anymore, if you're fully willing to break that whenever it's not convenient.
Actually, depending on the case, if the victim killed the assailant (rapist), then she could probably be found not guilty by way of "self defense." Just saying.
_____
I've got a great solution. Develop an artificial womb, that will take these fetuses, and develop them until birth. That way the mother doesn't have to have it growing inside her, and the State of Alabama can pay for the child to be raised til full term in the artificial womb.
What are you talking about? Do I need to spend certain amount of mental focus on a number, or what? Who cares what the number is, it's not even relevant to the point. If you go revenge kill a rapist, it's going to be classed as murder whether it's week after, 4 months, 2 years 1 month 58 seconds or 50 years. Didn't imagine it needed explaining but hey, live and learn.
...
Would it clear up the confusion had I used the word murder instead of kill? I only didn't use it, because this is a thread where many people are obviously clueless on what the legal definition of murder is, because they throw it around based on their agenda. That's the only reason I didn't use it on that particular sentence.
The legal definition of murder answers those kind of questions.
Didn't I just address this? In the last post no less. Was it in wrong language or something? I mean, do tell me if you're after some point or if you want to argue for the sake or arguing. Either is fine, but if it's the latter then I'd like to save the effort of trying to figure what the former might be.
This is just one of the many reasons why Alabama is a shithole state. Instead of trying to improve their state and make people actually want to live there, they do shit like this.
Yes, your language indicated that killing a victim killing their rapist is always murder, regardless of timeline. That's not accurate in any way shape or form. Hell, it could be 6 months later and still not be murder.
Oh, and you did use murder originally. So I'm not sure where your last post in any way addresses this.
....
It's completely beside the point anyway. It was a comparison. You're allowed to kill someone in self defense, just as you're allowed abortion if your life is in danger. Great, sounds like law has it covered. You're stuck on that part still, but you see, the post already moved past this, and went straight to comparing the situations outside of those cases. For one the legality seems to be in dispute, and for the other it isn't. I'll let you guess which is which.
In any case, I need to get some sleep.
I'd ask how much money can you offer.
Last edited by Aedrielle; 2019-05-11 at 01:00 AM.
I mean ... 70% of their elected legislature voted in favor of this shit.
That said, those elected officials had the "green light" from their constituents.
Alabama, although a "shithole" INDEED is apparently very livable for Alabamans (or Alabamians. Maybe Alabamites???)
Correct, it's not a "baby". Emrbyo/fetus are just the developing stages of a "human" (i.e. referencing it's humanity as an existing fact).
Literal definition. https://www.merriam-webster.com/
Think those fly on this forum?
The Law proposed (at 6 weeks) is retarded. A women could simply mistake that for a late cycle (has happened to my significant other when she's stressed). Need to be mindful of a women's right of choice, BUT we also don't need to be a society whom tolerates the legal potential for a fetal human to be terminated while the mother is crowning.
Last edited by J012D4N; 2019-05-11 at 01:21 AM.
This whole debate is stupid. Since the right is trying to assign rights to an unborn fetus as a person then how do we deal with the slavery aspect? You can't force the mother to be a slave for 9 months to the little parasite. Something else to go to court over.