View Poll Results: Classic into OSRS?

Voters
249. This poll is closed
  • Hell no #nochanges

    114 45.78%
  • YES!

    135 54.22%
Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ...
6
7
8
  1. #141
    Quote Originally Posted by Specialka View Post
    No, any new content should be add to bfa and so on, because vanilla had no balance whatsoever, shitty itemization and such. It is not fit to receive new content.
    That makes no sense. So because some things weren't as balanced as you'd like, it doesn't deserve new content?

  2. #142
    Quote Originally Posted by matrix123mko View Post
    scrapping everything Blizzard accomplished in last 15 years.
    i would call it "a pure win"

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Laserchicken87 View Post
    Many of the excisting features excist because many players asked for them.
    umm... for example?

  3. #143
    High Overlord Tom007p's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    178
    Blizzard should just focus on releasing the original trilogy, as these are guaranteed successes, plus I don't think classic+ should be a thing due to a multitude of reasons. First off I can't see current Blizzard releasing content that is comparable to that of the 2004 game, I also could see an issue with making new assets for the game, think about it; would Blizzard really want to make assets for a game that look like they're fresh from 2004 to keep the game coherent? I have my doubts. If Blizzard were to do classic+ though and implement a democratic system for voting on additional content, I believe that there should be a heavy limit on who can vote, first of all you should have to have a level 60 and last but not least they should make votes require 70%+ of the vote to be implemented, as anything below that can easily divide a player base.

  4. #144
    Quote Originally Posted by Mirain1 View Post
    That makes no sense. So because some things weren't as balanced as you'd like, it doesn't deserve new content?
    Because that would be pure waste. And I thought it was #nochange?

  5. #145
    Scarab Lord
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    One path
    Posts
    4,930
    After naxx, sure, why not. More interesting than letting it sit or wipe the server only to start anew. That can be done at any time once enough are begging them to.
    Every patch is the worst until the next one arrives, then it's nostalgia and suddenly the best while the new patch takes over being the worst.

    If you knew the candle was fire then the meal was cooked a long time ago.

  6. #146
    Quote Originally Posted by Tom007p View Post
    Blizzard should just focus on releasing the original trilogy, as these are guaranteed successes, plus I don't think classic+ should be a thing due to a multitude of reasons. First off I can't see current Blizzard releasing content that is comparable to that of the 2004 game, I also could see an issue with making new assets for the game, think about it; would Blizzard really want to make assets for a game that look like they're fresh from 2004 to keep the game coherent? I have my doubts. If Blizzard were to do classic+ though and implement a democratic system for voting on additional content, I believe that there should be a heavy limit on who can vote, first of all you should have to have a level 60 and last but not least they should make votes require 70%+ of the vote to be implemented, as anything below that can easily divide a player base.
    agree, just release vanilla tbc wotlk

  7. #147
    Absolutely no to this. Players don't know what they want, and if left up to polls we'll end up right at BfA again. Leave Classic alone.

  8. #148
    The Lightbringer czarek's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    zug zug
    Posts
    3,193
    Hell yeah fuck nochangers

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •