Exactly. It's that negative feedback loop I was referring to. And people just seem to be...fine with it I guess? It's bizarre to me. All efforts to build a system that actually creates good teams and matchups, especially ones we don't see every year, face fierce resistance. Even worst-case scenario, why would you rather see the same 3 or 4 teams beat-up the same 3 or 4 other teams every year in stead of the teams having more variance, especially if it means that we start seeing new blood winning? How is that not better than watching Alabama/OSU/Clemson beat-up OU/ND/etc for the Nth year in a row?