Recent Blue Posts
The War Within Alpha Development Notes
Professions Update: Concentration in The War Within
New heritage armors (Draenei and Troll) are not acceptable
MMO-Champion
So just wanting to get opinions here, a lot of people keep saying Classic has more subs than Retail, or vise versa, there was an article posted which you can read here. https://www.battlechat.co/2019/09/wo...R3FvJ6ZYMBO5A0
in the article is says "Blizzards main income for World of Warcraft still comes from paid services like mounts and race changes. Which is also a reason why BFA scored better than Classic." Of course BFA Scored better because it is 1 sub, you have to sub to the main game which is retail to play classic, classic is free with that sub, so how can people say classic is beating retail when it is all under the same roof?
Recent Forum Posts
Thread: Classic Vs Retail
-
2019-09-23, 06:55 PM #1The Patient
- Join Date
- Oct 2015
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 251
Classic Vs Retail
-
2019-09-23, 06:57 PM #2I am Murloc!
- Join Date
- Mar 2017
- Location
- Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Posts
- 5,306
Blizzard doesn't care as long as you pay a sub
This world don't give us nothing. It be our lot to suffer... and our duty to fight back.
-
2019-09-23, 06:59 PM #3The Lightbringer
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Posts
- 3,855
Game vs game threads are not allowed here so Thread gets locked in 5... 4... 3...
-
2019-09-23, 07:00 PM #4The Patient
- Join Date
- Oct 2015
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 251
Pretty much also that part in the article made me laugh because I doubt their main income for the game is mounts and such, they still have a lot of people subbed which is where they get 90% of their money I would assume.
Originally Posted by Maljinwo
How can it be game vs game when it is the same game? lol Originally Posted by melzas
-
2019-09-23, 07:01 PM #5Moderator
- Join Date
- Oct 2009
- Location
- Philadelphia, PA-US
- Posts
- 45,793
"Game vs. Game" type threads, as well as debates about subscription metrics, aren't really conducive to constructive debate or discussion. Closing this.
"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
