Oh, my FAVORITE "they changed the rules" bit, is that the republicans actually changed the rules in the house in 2015, so that the minority party no longer has subpoena power during investigations. Who would have thought THAT would come back and bite them in the butt? lol
Oh, it gets better. Er, okay not better, but it stays good.
House Democrats remind everyone that blocking witnesses from coming forward is obstruction.
Last night, the Committees learned that the State Department, at the direction of the White House, directed Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch not to appear for her voluntary interview today. This is the latest example of the Administration’s efforts to conceal the facts from the American people and obstruct our lawful and constitutionally-authorized impeachment inquiry.
In response, the House Intelligence Committee issued a subpoena to compel her testimony this morning. This duly authorized subpoena is mandatory, and the illegitimate order from the Trump Administration not to cooperate has no force. As is required of her, the Ambassador is now complying with the subpoena and answering questions from both Democratic and Republican Members and staff.
Any efforts by Trump Administration officials to prevent witness cooperation with the Committees will be deemed obstruction of a co-equal branch of government and an adverse inference may be drawn against the President on the underlying allegations of corruption and coverup.
I don't think that's true. There are plenty of politicians dirtier than Trump in countries with a longer history of rampant corruption. They're just not quite so stupid in how they go about it.
Trump is without a doubt the most visibly corrupt politician in the world at the moment.
But, it isn't. Amazing right? What can be given without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence, just like your claim that there is a "whistleblower" relative that says the whistleblower is wrong. Meanwhile, all of the actual evidence says that the whistle blower was right, thanks to Trump releasing the evidence.
What are you talking about? You are the one that said ANYTHING about a fucking relative. And the whistleblower is going to testify when the Democrats find a suitable way for them to testify without the Republicans releasing the identity of the whistleblower. Because we all know what you Republicans will do to that whistleblower because of your history of supporting terrorists and death threats against people that are destroying your worldview.
hes a socialist and a nationalist
id call him a nationalist socialist
maybe hes also in favor of workers and wish they had a party that represented them
a nationalist socialist workers party
thats usually what you get in europe when you mix nationalism and socialism together
So, he's a Swedish Democrat? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sweden_Democrats