1. #2801
    Titan Teriz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Beach City
    Posts
    14,836
    Quote Originally Posted by Serenity River View Post
    Your "mech" is already in game... No Tinkers for you as you can already roleplay one:

    Now if you tell us to play Hunter for our Dark Ranger wants or Deathknight for our Necromancer wants you can just do the same for your "Tinker" wants.
    Feel free to show me a video of you performing DPS, Tankng, healing, or even going inside a building or dungeon while inside that mech.

    Thanks.
    My comic series inspired by WoW and MMOs:

    Tinker Class Concept 2018 Dragonsworn Class Concept 2019

  2. #2802
    Dreadlord bloodkin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    in your mind
    Posts
    857
    I sincerely hope blizz doesn't add 'tinker' as a class. Beside the fact that blizz doesn't seem that interested/good at balancing the game, the entire concept behind it is bad in my opinion. It adds nothing new on existing lore we don't already have such as that monks and DK's did and will probably involve stripping down a profession.
    'Something's awry.' -Duhgan 'Bel' beltayn

    'A Man choses, a Slave obeys.' -Andrew Rayn

  3. #2803
    Titan Teriz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Beach City
    Posts
    14,836
    Quote Originally Posted by bloodkin View Post
    I sincerely hope blizz doesn't add 'tinker' as a class. Beside the fact that blizz doesn't seem that interested/good at balancing the game, the entire concept behind it is bad in my opinion. It adds nothing new on existing lore we don't already have such as that monks and DK's did and will probably involve stripping down a profession.
    A Tinker class wouldn't effect the engineering profession negatively in any respect.

    If anything, it would be entirely positive.
    My comic series inspired by WoW and MMOs:

    Tinker Class Concept 2018 Dragonsworn Class Concept 2019

  4. #2804
    Quote Originally Posted by bloodkin View Post
    I sincerely hope blizz doesn't add 'tinker' as a class. Beside the fact that blizz doesn't seem that interested/good at balancing the game, the entire concept behind it is bad in my opinion. It adds nothing new on existing lore we don't already have such as that monks and DK's did and will probably involve stripping down a profession.
    i wuld said engineering have more to gain by tinker/machinist becus it cant really make ammo for hunter anymore engineering making weapon for a new class wuld work fine

  5. #2805
    Quote Originally Posted by Dragtox View Post
    i wuld said engineering have more to gain by tinker/machinist becus it cant really make ammo for hunter anymore engineering making weapon for a new class wuld work fine
    Hunter's havent required ammo since the end of TBC also Engineer could only make Bullets NOT arrows the last lot of Bullets it could make was [Fel Iron Shells] and to me looking at this engineering list of recipes https://wowwiki.fandom.com/wiki/Engineering_recipes you can actually live your "Tinker" dream in WoW as most of it is already "Tinkerable", at this point I'd rather Blizz fix and work on the current classes give them their identities back than shove a shitty class in there such as Tinker.

  6. #2806
    Dreadlord bloodkin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    in your mind
    Posts
    857
    Quote Originally Posted by Teriz View Post
    A Tinker class wouldn't effect the engineering profession negatively in any respect.

    If anything, it would be entirely positive.
    How exactly? what added value can it possibly have? did demon hunters add any value to warlocks, or did they lose a spec defining ability?

    People advocating for tinkers are as bad a the high elf crowd. There is no niche that that absolutely needs to be filled in the current class/spec lineup that would fit in the overall lore of the game, let alone by something that is sprinkled so sparingly by blizzard across the entire franchise as mechanical tech.

    If blizzard would add a class, I'd rather see them ad an alchemist type of class. It would infringe on alchemy as much as a tinker does on engineering, but would fit the lore far better and sound less stupid.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Serenity River View Post
    Hunter's havent required ammo since the end of TBC also Engineer could only make Bullets NOT arrows the last lot of Bullets it could make was [Fel Iron Shells] and to me looking at this engineering list of recipes https://wowwiki.fandom.com/wiki/Engineering_recipes you can actually live your "Tinker" dream in WoW as most of it is already "Tinkerable", at this point I'd rather Blizz fix and work on the current classes give them their identities back than shove a shitty class in there such as Tinker.
    this should be the most important focus for blizz. they already watered down just about every class as it is. Blizz should fix this and forget about adding any classes or specs ever again, as they just aren't capable at keeping all the classes interesting anymore.
    'Something's awry.' -Duhgan 'Bel' beltayn

    'A Man choses, a Slave obeys.' -Andrew Rayn

  7. #2807
    Quote Originally Posted by Serenity River View Post
    Hunter's havent required ammo since the end of TBC also Engineer could only make Bullets NOT arrows the last lot of Bullets it could make was [Fel Iron Shells] and to me looking at this engineering list of recipes https://wowwiki.fandom.com/wiki/Engineering_recipes you can actually live your "Tinker" dream in WoW as most of it is already "Tinkerable", at this point I'd rather Blizz fix and work on the current classes give them their identities back than shove a shitty class in there such as Tinker.
    Completely wrong. Hunters Required Ammo until the end of WotLK. I absolutely remember making Ammo in general and I didn't start until WotLK.

    We made both bullets and arrows at the time.

    https://wowwiki.fandom.com/wiki/Iceblade_Arrow
    https://wowwiki.fandom.com/wiki/Shatter_Rounds

  8. #2808
    Quote Originally Posted by DotEleven View Post
    Completely wrong. Hunters Required Ammo until the end of WotLK. I absolutely remember making Ammo in general and I didn't start until WotLK.

    We made both bullets and arrows at the time.

    https://wowwiki.fandom.com/wiki/Iceblade_Arrow
    https://wowwiki.fandom.com/wiki/Shatter_Rounds
    I stand corrected on that but I still stand by you already have your Tink fantasy....

  9. #2809
    Titan Teriz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Beach City
    Posts
    14,836
    Quote Originally Posted by bloodkin View Post
    How exactly? what added value can it possibly have? did demon hunters add any value to warlocks, or did they lose a spec defining ability?
    Warlock is a class not a profession. Warlocks and Demon Hunters compete with raid and dungeon spots, thus obviously there's an issue with them having similar abilities. A Tinker and someone with the engineering profession do not, mainly because the profession doesn't have abilities, they create items for sale. In fact, in WoW you can be both an Engineer and a Tinker at the same time under one character.

    I find it absolutely crazy that people who supposedly play this game can't figure this difference out.

    People advocating for tinkers are as bad a the high elf crowd. There is no niche that that absolutely needs to be filled in the current class/spec lineup that would fit in the overall lore of the game, let alone by something that is sprinkled so sparingly by blizzard across the entire franchise as mechanical tech.
    Goblins, Gnomes, and now Mechagnomes are high tech races with no class that reflects their unique racial culture. In addition, there's a massive theme of technology throughout WoW that no class currently represents.
    My comic series inspired by WoW and MMOs:

    Tinker Class Concept 2018 Dragonsworn Class Concept 2019

  10. #2810
    Quote Originally Posted by Serenity River View Post
    I stand corrected on that but I still stand by you already have your Tink fantasy....
    Mind informing everyone what you think the tinker fan base wants? Because I don’t think you know.

  11. #2811
    Quote Originally Posted by Serenity River View Post
    I stand corrected on that but I still stand by you already have your Tink fantasy....
    We do not. I cannot do an entire fight using mechanical gizmos and gadgets, with other playstyles potentially setting up and maintaining said gadgets, or overpowering people with my ingenuity.

  12. #2812
    Titan Teriz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Beach City
    Posts
    14,836
    Quote Originally Posted by Serenity River View Post
    I stand corrected on that but I still stand by you already have your Tink fantasy....
    Again, where's the video of your character tanking, DPSing, healing, or even walking inside a dungeon or building while inside that mech?
    My comic series inspired by WoW and MMOs:

    Tinker Class Concept 2018 Dragonsworn Class Concept 2019

  13. #2813
    I think and I say I think the majority of the playerbase would like their current classes fixed before adding something as shitty as Tinker, its a joke class for a joke of a people.

    Also mechagons story ends with its dungeon, I begrudgingly did it yesterday it was boring as shit and I was glad when it was over.

  14. #2814
    Quote Originally Posted by Teriz View Post
    Yeah, but Hunters can go petless, and Survival can alternate between melee and ranged. The only thing missing is dual wielding.
    Only MM Hunters can go Petless. You miss out on your class fantasy if you want to be a melee Hunter without a pet like you see in game. And of course the dual wielding.

    Again, this is akin to putting a Tinker class into the game but not having a mech as part of the toolkit. Would you be satisfied with that?

    Also Subtley Rogues click all of those boxes, and even have the shadow theme.
    Except you said that the Hunter was the class that was synonymous with Ranger.

  15. #2815
    Quote Originally Posted by Serenity River View Post
    I think and I say I think the majority of the playerbase would like their current classes fixed before adding something as shitty as Tinker, its a joke class for a joke of a people.

    Also mechagons story ends with its dungeon, I begrudgingly did it yesterday it was boring as shit and I was glad when it was over.
    We are so likeminded that people would think you are my second account or something.

  16. #2816
    Titan Teriz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Beach City
    Posts
    14,836
    Quote Originally Posted by jellmoo View Post
    Only MM Hunters can go Petless. You miss out on your class fantasy if you want to be a melee Hunter without a pet like you see in game. And of course the dual wielding.

    Again, this is akin to putting a Tinker class into the game but not having a mech as part of the toolkit. Would you be satisfied with that?
    If the pet is that huge of an issue, you can simply not summon your pet as Survival. Problem solved.

    It's nowhere near comparable to not having a mech as a Tinker.


    Except you said that the Hunter was the class that was synonymous with Ranger.
    Which it is. Details from other games doesn't change that fact.
    My comic series inspired by WoW and MMOs:

    Tinker Class Concept 2018 Dragonsworn Class Concept 2019

  17. #2817
    Quote Originally Posted by deviantcultist View Post
    We are so likeminded that people would think you are my second account or something.
    LOL don't say that they probably will think we are one person xD

  18. #2818
    Quote Originally Posted by Serenity River View Post
    I think and I say I think the majority of the playerbase would like their current classes fixed before adding something as shitty as Tinker, its a joke class for a joke of a people.

    Also mechagons story ends with its dungeon, I begrudgingly did it yesterday it was boring as shit and I was glad when it was over.
    blizzard are already on the class fixing they even idmit they made mistake

    i say this again tho we still need to wait for blizzcon but y we dont have any beta on next expansion to see diffrence yet aswell
    but i know artifact weapon was a big mistake on some classes hunter was one of the most out of place thing with artifact weapon and was more a danger to classes
    but with lvl 60 as max lvl change so i think it gona solve artifact weapon mistake hopefully

    not gona say druid artifact was a mistake the different druid cat and bear form works and made druids form look more different to each other

  19. #2819
    Quote Originally Posted by Teriz View Post
    If the pet is that huge of an issue, you can simply not summon your pet as Survival. Problem solved.

    It's nowhere near comparable to not having a mech as a Tinker.




    Which it is. Details from other games doesn't change that fact.
    And lose a huge chunk of your damage aswell as some of your survivability, oh you totally think these things through don't you, would you take a petless survival hunter in raids? no no thought not...

    Seriously you're a troll at this point if one things good for one set of people but the same sort of solution is not good enough for you.

  20. #2820
    Titan Teriz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Beach City
    Posts
    14,836
    Quote Originally Posted by Serenity River View Post
    I think and I say I think the majority of the playerbase would like their current classes fixed before adding something as shitty as Tinker, its a joke class for a joke of a people.
    I disagree. Perhaps the majority on these forums, but the majority of the playerbase are always excited for new classes. It's part of the reason new class expansions are among the most popular whenever they're ranked.
    My comic series inspired by WoW and MMOs:

    Tinker Class Concept 2018 Dragonsworn Class Concept 2019

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •