Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
LastLast
  1. #1

    Why do womans pants not have pockets?

    It maeks no sense to not have pcoetks

  2. #2
    The Forgettable Forgettable's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Calgary, Canada
    Posts
    4,951
    So that they are forced to buy purses obviously. #BigPurse

  3. #3
    I guess because women would have a purse with them anyway? I have no idea. Maybe women don't like having a bulky wallet, phone and keys in their pockets, but men don't care?

  4. #4
    Because Americans care more for a tight ass then pockets? In my 43 years, I’ve never had pants without pockets and had no idea that was an issue, until I entered the world of internet and learned that pockets are rare in the US. Even so, you can get pants with pockets in the US too, but apparently women don’t want those.

  5. #5
    Banned KOUNTERPARTS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    "Church of the Prophet of the Light: Dien-Ap-Sten"
    Posts
    1,608
    Quote Originally Posted by Narwhalosh Whalescream View Post
    It maeks no sense to not have pcoetks
    Sorry, I can't make out what you typed.

  6. #6
    Well, I notice blue jeans with back pockets for the ladies...

  7. #7
    We prefer to use a purse. Even if my pants have pockets, I never use them.
    “Fairy tales are more than true – not because they tell us dragons exist, but because they tell us dragons can be beaten.” - G. K. Chesterton & Neil Gaiman
    Twitter | DeviantArt | Twitch

  8. #8
    The Lightbringer Cerilis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    3,002
    Bulky filled pockets suck and don't look good. There also are purses for stuff. So small pockets are sufficient.

  9. #9
    Brewmaster Dwarfhamster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    A plastic cage
    Posts
    1,487
    Quote Originally Posted by Narwhalosh Whalescream View Post
    It maeks no sense to not have pcoetks
    Is there something wrong with your fingers?

  10. #10
    I guess you shouldn't mess with the curves. And bulk does kinda mess up the lines a bit.

  11. #11
    Legendary! Santti's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    6,792
    Asking the important questions.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ransath View Post
    Money laundering, especially prior to his election? I couldn't give a flying fuck.

  12. #12
    Moderator Crissi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    The Moon
    Posts
    30,775
    Because apparently having pockets makes the pants not look good? Which is silly. Pockets are handy. and the fact that even when they give us pockets, they;re super small should be a crime against humanity.

    Especially with more places banning traditional purses, like a lot of stadiums. Its not gotta either be clear or a clutch type, which is super annoying.

    Basically, give us actual pockets! A sizeable amount of us like pockets.

  13. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by Crissi View Post
    Because apparently having pockets makes the pants not look good? Which is silly. Pockets are handy. and the fact that even when they give us pockets, they;re super small should be a crime against humanity.
    What I find even worse are the pants that look like they have pockets, but don't. All the stitching is there, but just no pocket.

  14. #14
    Who needs pockets when fanny packs exist?

  15. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by Amerissis View Post
    Because Americans care more for a tight ass then pockets? In my 43 years, I’ve never had pants without pockets and had no idea that was an issue, until I entered the world of internet and learned that pockets are rare in the US. Even so, you can get pants with pockets in the US too, but apparently women don’t want those.
    Women want pockets, we just can't find many.

    And when you do, you cling onto them like grim death until the pockets are all that remain.

  16. #16
    It’s a plot by the Patriarchy. To keep women dependent on men.

    You’ll see that is working when you go to the theme park and have the phones of three different women in your pockets. Because by the grace of your gender you have been given pockets that are useful. So you can subjugate the ladies.

    Seriously pockets need to be useful. My friend has to carry her phone her in back pocket and the dang thing looks precariously preached the entire time. I don’t know how you ladies do it if I didn’t have useful pockets I’d drop F bombs until I could buy pants with useful pockets.

  17. #17
    Brewmaster Slirith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Gamindustri
    Posts
    1,251
    Not fashionable? Who knows? I find it silly women have this need to put their entire house in their purse.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQ52sXi0ke4 What every new person to online games should watch

  18. #18
    Void Lord Elegiac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Bouncing coins off my witcher.
    Posts
    44,992
    Modern women's clothing has been generally designed by men and prioritises aesthetics over functionality, simple enough reason.

    My recommendation for all my feminine friends out there is to buy pants in the men's section since the sizing tends to be more predictable and the pockets are actual...pockets.

    Delenda Est.

  19. #19
    The Lightbringer Cerilis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    3,002
    Quote Originally Posted by Elegiac View Post
    Modern women's clothing has been generally designed by men and prioritises aesthetics over functionality, simple enough reason.

    My recommendation for all my feminine friends out there is to buy pants in the men's section since the sizing tends to be more predictable and the pockets are actual...pockets.
    But girl pants look better. What about the butts? Why would nobody think of the butts?

  20. #20
    Void Lord Elegiac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Bouncing coins off my witcher.
    Posts
    44,992
    Quote Originally Posted by Cerilis View Post
    But girl pants look better. What about the butts? Why would nobody think of the butts?
    Didn't I literally just say that the lack of pockets was precisely because of prioritizing aesthetics over function?

    The point is women shouldn't have to be stuck in the realm of one or the other. Same thing goes for men and the complete lack of variety in men's styles.

    Delenda Est.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •