Poll: Should they remove void form?

Page 13 of 16 FirstFirst ...
3
11
12
13
14
15
... LastLast
  1. #241
    Let me just take a famous George Lucas quote and rework it just a little from

    Jar Jar's the key to all this, if we get Jar Jar working. 'Cause he's a funnier character than we've ever had in the movies...
    to

    Void Form the key to all this, if we get Void Form working. 'Cause it's a funnier ability than we've ever had in the spec...
    and we'll have the state of Shadow. Only we are going into the third prequel film and Jar Jar was reworked to have Anakins role from the start. Meesa no likey sand

  2. #242
    Quote Originally Posted by Wuusah View Post
    I know that the ability has problems. But that's not a reason to remove it. Imo unique gameplay is more important than perfectly balanced gameplay and shadow right now is unique. It would be a shame if VF was removed and the spec turned into just another "generate and spend" rotation.
    Shadow from TBC to WoD was more unique. And more importantly, it was a functional spec with mechanics that made sense and had some sort of synergy between eachother.

    Oh, and give us back the old Shadowform visual while they are at it.
    They're (short for They are) describes a group of people. "They're/They are a nice bunch of guys." Their indicates that something belongs/is related to a group of people. "Their car was all out of fuel." There refers to a location. "Let's set up camp over there." There is also no such thing as "could/should OF". The correct way is: Could/should'VE, or could/should HAVE.
    Holyfury armory

  3. #243
    If people want shadow orbs.

    Please fk off back to Affliction or Arcane, you're not wanted.

  4. #244
    Quote Originally Posted by Spicymemer View Post
    If people want shadow orbs.

    Please fk off back to Affliction or Arcane, you're not wanted.
    Hmmm, no.

    Also, Affliction was ruined with it's UA being a spender as well. Blizz shifted spriest to affliction and demonology into spriest. While I like the current demonology style, the other two felt far worse than previous iterations.
    The wise wolf who's pride is her wisdom isn't so sharp as drunk.

  5. #245
    https://us.forums.blizzard.com/en/wo...ges/490697/116

    These new changes are exciting. Especially since we're in beta!
    change can't wait.

  6. #246
    Brewmaster Skylarking's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Centrelink
    Posts
    1,327
    Quote Originally Posted by Skylarking View Post
    I hope they do some shit in shadowlands where they remove voidform because old gods have been yeeted but demon hunters still exist so that doesn't give me much hope. If they choose to keep it then just make it some passive talent or something and keep it far away as possible from being viable so it does not affect gameplay.
    Thank fuck they listened, i somewhat got my wish and im happy with that. Can't wait to get into spriest in SL.

  7. #247
    Quote Originally Posted by ThrashMetalFtw View Post
    Oh, and give us back the old Shadowform visual while they are at it.
    Give us old mind flay too!

  8. #248
    Quote Originally Posted by Chickat View Post
    Id rather they make shadow a holy dps spec and make a new shadow based class.

    Maybe Shadow ranged dps spec, Shadow ranged dps with gun/bow/xbow, shadow healing spec. So something like WoD Shadow Priest for the ranged dps spec, a dark ranger ranger spec, and a healing spec using void magic. Mail or cloth armor, but I feel mail would work better as it would fill the gap in the mail slot.
    would step on too many toes and piss off too many people, we also have too many dark specs as is, though i agree that we could use a holy mage more than shadow priest.

    I think the best option would be to break up classes and let players pick and choose up to 3 specs based on what they want their character to be, then introduce some specs to fill in the gaps that were left like holy mage (inquisitor?) dark ranger or necromancer, which would all be great with just 1 good spec.

  9. #249
    The Unstoppable Force Chickat's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Orgrimmar
    Posts
    20,640
    I'd love that, but seems more like a WoW 2 thing. It was awesome in Rift.

  10. #250
    Stood in the Fire eScar95's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Camp Pendleton, California
    Posts
    473
    I honestly just want Shadowform gone, Voidform to be made a cool down, and void bolt to be a seperate ability. They also need to clean up their spell book because at this point it just looks like a mess on the PTR.
    Personality: INTJ



    “Greatness, at any cost.”

  11. #251
    Quote Originally Posted by Chickat View Post
    I'd love that, but seems more like a WoW 2 thing. It was awesome in Rift.
    Rift has the coolest class/talent trees and combos.
    Priest Warrior
    You are not your role. You are not how much gold you have on your account.
    You are not the mount you ride. You are not the contents of your bank.
    You are not your epic purples. You are not a special and unique snowflake.
    You are the all-grinding, all-farming crap of Azeroth.

  12. #252
    People really seem to like shadow right now.
    But those people dont raid / havent raided.
    Its not going to be fun anymore.
    The priest community discord really dropped the ball on this one.

  13. #253
    Elemental Lord
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    8,276
    Quote Originally Posted by Spicymemer View Post
    People really seem to like shadow right now.
    But those people dont raid / havent raided.
    Its not going to be fun anymore.
    The priest community discord really dropped the ball on this one.
    There is more then raiding..
    What is not going to be fun anymore?

    Shadow feels better then it ever was.

  14. #254
    Quote Originally Posted by BobAwesome View Post
    Rift has the coolest class/talent trees and combos.
    omg that game is still alive? XD

  15. #255
    As a Former Resto Druid main that has not been able to take it seriously since them removing Tree Form and making it a CD. I think everyone should take a strong look and decide if this is really what you want.
    \

  16. #256
    Quote Originally Posted by schwank05 View Post
    As a Former Resto Druid main that has not been able to take it seriously since them removing Tree Form and making it a CD. I think everyone should take a strong look and decide if this is really what you want.
    \
    Apples and oranges.

  17. #257
    Quote Originally Posted by schwank05 View Post
    As a Former Resto Druid main that has not been able to take it seriously since them removing Tree Form and making it a CD. I think everyone should take a strong look and decide if this is really what you want.
    \
    Explain to me how this is comparable. Tree form just gave you better stats, slower move speed, no access to any other spells, and less mana costs.

    Void form was a terrible, temporary form that you constantly had to build up a resource in order to spend get into your form then spam abilities hoping something didn’t interfere with your rotation that knocked you out of the form or else your damage would suffer tremendously.

    Shadow priests turned into void form. That was basically it. If you weren’t in void form, you were working to get into void form, and when you were in void form you were working to stay in void form. It wasn’t fun. Especially in pvp. It felt terrible.

  18. #258
    Mechagnome Recovery's Avatar
    3+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    645
    Quote Originally Posted by Mosha View Post
    Explain to me how this is comparable. Tree form just gave you better stats, slower move speed, no access to any other spells, and less mana costs.

    Void form was a terrible, temporary form that you constantly had to build up a resource in order to spend get into your form then spam abilities hoping something didn’t interfere with your rotation that knocked you out of the form or else your damage would suffer tremendously.

    Shadow priests turned into void form. That was basically it. If you weren’t in void form, you were working to get into void form, and when you were in void form you were working to stay in void form. It wasn’t fun. Especially in pvp. It felt terrible.
    SOmeone had mentioned taking shadow form away completely and only having void form cooldown. Thats what he was comparing to Druid tree form. Read between the lines, bud. You can do it. I believe in you.


    as for my "2 cents"...

    Priest playstyle was bonkers pre shadowlands changes. It wasnt fun. It wasnt fun whatsoever. It was kinda like socialism.. Good concept on paper, bad in practice.

    Post shadowlands changes are much more fluid. The class actually make sense..

  19. #259
    Quote Originally Posted by Recovery View Post
    SOmeone had mentioned taking shadow form away completely and only having void form cooldown. Thats what he was comparing to Druid tree form. Read between the lines, bud. You can do it. I believe in you.


    as for my "2 cents"...

    Priest playstyle was bonkers pre shadowlands changes. It wasnt fun. It wasnt fun whatsoever. It was kinda like socialism.. Good concept on paper, bad in practice.

    Post shadowlands changes are much more fluid. The class actually make sense..
    Oh one of these guys...

    So the post I'm commenting on doesn't have a quote, so one can assume he is commenting on the OP correct? If there was context he was directly replying to then one can assume you should be using this cool quote feature in order to show others what you're talking about. Right? Does this make sense to you honey?

    This isn't 'reading between the lines' this guy straight up didn't put any context in his post if this is truly what he is commenting on.

    Let me explain this to you in case you don't understand.

    If I come in here, not quoting anything and put "What a dumb idea", you would probably assume I'm talking about the OP? Wouldn't you? Well...if you don't you should. But if I am specifically talking about a post such as

    As a Former Resto Druid main that has not been able to take it seriously since them removing Tree Form and making it a CD. I think everyone should take a strong look and decide if this is really what you want.
    Then I should probably quote that post and then say 'what a dumb idea'.

    You get how that works? Or should I explain it more for you.

    Also, whose to say he isn't responding to the OP? What makes you say he is responding to that post specifically? Can you read his mind?
    Last edited by Mosha; 2020-10-05 at 05:48 PM.

  20. #260
    Mechagnome Recovery's Avatar
    3+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    645
    Quote Originally Posted by Mosha View Post
    Oh one of these guys...

    So the post I'm commenting on doesn't have a quote, so one can assume he is commenting on the OP correct? If there was context he was directly replying to then one can assume you should be using this cool quote feature in order to show others what you're talking about. Right? Does this make sense to you honey?

    This isn't 'reading between the lines' this guy straight up didn't put any context in his post if this is truly what he is commenting on.

    Let me explain this to you in case you don't understand.

    If I come in here, not quoting anything and put "What a dumb idea", you would probably assume I'm talking about the OP? Wouldn't you? Well...if you don't you should. But if I am specifically talking about a post such as



    Then I should probably quote that post and then say 'what a dumb idea'.

    You get how that works? Or should I explain it more for you.

    Also, whose to say he isn't responding to the OP? What makes you say he is responding to that post specifically? Can you read his mind?
    There is this cool little thing that is a part of language and reading comprehension that people call context clues.

    With his analogy, youd have to assume that hes talking about taking something that is permanent (Void form isnt) and making it a cool down. Therefore, its quite simple to deduce that he is talking about shadowform rather than void form, seeing as how void form isnt a permanent state.
    Last edited by Recovery; 2020-10-05 at 06:25 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •