What if?.... Frostmourne is the Jailer. Upon the blade being broken he was freed back to his realm. Now, Frostmourne hungers...
What if?.... Frostmourne is the Jailer. Upon the blade being broken he was freed back to his realm. Now, Frostmourne hungers...
TBH he is undead paladin atm xD
By D&D standards, anything involving resurrection even if it's bringing a soul back to its body in its original living state (not an undead one) is considered in the school of Necromancy.
I know WoW and D&D are different universes and different beasts, but just want to point out that by those rules (it's not fully clear in WoW's universe), Druids, Priests, Warlocks, (obviously) Death Knights, Shamans, Monks, and yes even Paladins, have some 'knowledge of Necromancy'.
Still wondering why I play this game.
I'm a Rogue and I also made a spreadsheet for the Order Hall that is updated for BfA.
Fact (because I say so): TBC > Cata > Legion > ShaLa > MoP > DF > BfA > WoD = WotLK
My pet collection --> http://www.warcraftpets.com/collection/FuxieDK/
This didn't happen though. He was a Paladin all the way up to Wrathgate, he was burned by the Red Dragonflight, taken to Icecrown and tortured until the Lich Kings defeat and then put on the Helm of Domination.
He was never subjected to a decade of Death Magic. Are you sure you're thinking of Bolvar Fordragon?
https://wowwiki.fandom.com/wiki/Bolvar_Fordragon
He is a deadknight for sure.
I think the "over a decade" dude is thinking the wow timeline pass as the same of RL time.
But now, since bolvar got the helm, it passed like 6 to 7 years. Granted, this timeline is unoficial, but if i remeber right, blizzard said that in lore it only take 1 year from each xpack, the exception being cata who took 2-3 years, i dont remember. Also i dont know if Chronicles adress the timeline thing.
Here's the source fr the timeline i used https://wow.gamepedia.com/Timeline_(unofficial)
Is bolvar a death knight? I dont know, was never stated he died/got his soul stolen by the helm or w/e shenanigans, i dont think he is, he just got the powers from the helmet.
I would say Bolvar is technically a Death Knight, yes. Probably the most unique of their number. But even though he lacks the Helm of Domination, it's likely Arthas connected him to the power sources of the Death Knights (Frost, Blood, and Unholy) in the same way he did Dranosh Saurfang, as both he and Bolvar were intended to be Death Knight Generals in his service. He just never managed to break Bolvar's will like he did with Dranosh.
"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
Ah, that's what you meant. Sorry, didn't know you were referring to his time wearing the helm. I don't think it's infused him with death magic though. But there's not really much information on it in regards to how it did what it did. Don't disagree that it affected Bolvar, though, just not really sure to what extent.
Bolvar is a strange character is he just a death knight? no he is more of a mix of paladin and dk fueled by the fire from the red dragon flight but then again there are very few major lore characters that fall under just one class
This. I don't think he ever was any variation of Death Knight. He was a Knight of Stormwind, and then he became a special fire force infernal, and then straight to Lich King.
- - - Updated - - -
Arthas never died. He was a Death Knight is a more traditional sense (IE: a Fallen Paladin a la D&D Blackguards). Even a large number of the Death Knights he created were created this way IIRC; in that they simply lost hope and became corrupted; but were never actually raised from the dead.