Page 1 of 5
1
2
3
... LastLast
  1. #1

    Prince Charles to be King in 2021

    The Queen is set to retire in 2021 leaving her the heir to the throne, Prince Charles, to become King. We have not seen a coronation in nearly 70 years (Around the time after WW2) Just imagine the coronation will become the most watched event in history for decades to come, however I’m definitely going to go to England to watch the ceremonies.
    Last edited by TheramoreIsTheBomb; 2019-11-30 at 06:41 PM.
    "You know you that bitch when you cause all this conversation."

  2. #2
    Figured he'd pass it on to his son anyway, wouldn't have thought he'd even want it at this stage.
    Quote Originally Posted by Shalcker View Post
    Posting here is primarily a way to strengthen your own viewpoint against common counter-arguments.

  3. #3
    Good time to kill it, like we need royal line...

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Bodonius View Post
    Good time to kill it, like we need royal line...
    Good luck trying, wish you all the best getting past all the royalists and legal red tape.

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Monster Hunter View Post
    Good luck trying, wish you all the best getting past all the royalists and legal red tape.
    Well i dont care, but its like sweden who need to pay extra for a face that only can wave

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by TheramoreIsTheBomb View Post
    The Queen is set to retire in 2021 leaving her the heir to the throne, Prince Charles, to become King. We have not seen a coronation in nearly 70 years (Around the time after WW2) Just imagine the coronation will become the most watched event in history for decades to come, however I’m definitely going to go to England to watch the ceremonies.
    Charles would become Prince regant and wouldn't be crowned King untill the Queen dies or abdicate's so there won't be a coronation but power will essentially transfer to him.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Bodonius View Post
    Well i dont care, but its like sweden who need to pay extra for a face that only can wave
    Exactly no ones does when it actualy comes down to making the enormous legal effort it would take.

    So just pipe down and let people enjoy there pomp and ceremony now and then. It brings in more than it costs by every study into it so far, and it ain't hurting any one but the jealous types so let people enjoy the pageantry.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Monster Hunter View Post
    Charles would become Prince regant and wouldn't be crowned King untill the Queen dies or abdicate's so there won't be a coronation but power will essentially transfer to him.
    Sure, or they just skip it liberals would love to kill the royal family they need a win

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Bodonius View Post
    Sure, or they just skip it liberals would love to kill the royal family they need a win
    UK liberals have no plans to remove the monarchy. No political party has any plans to, talking of such a thing is kind of illegal anyway though its only enforced if there's an actual threat.

    The whole thing is a legal messy mine field of century's of constitutional law that no one wants to deal with seriously and as they bring in more than they cost there's no incentive to go through that pain and potential civil unrest just to make some jealous socialist types feel better.

  9. #9
    So if this is true why isn't there breaking news on BBC/Sky/ITV/ Basically any and all channels in the UK

  10. #10
    Please wait Temp name's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Under construction
    Posts
    14,631
    Quote Originally Posted by Bodonius View Post
    Well i dont care, but its like sweden who need to pay extra for a face that only can wave
    You.. You do realize that you're making shit ton of money off of the royal family, right?

    They own a shit ton of land they're leasing to the government for a very significant loss (on the royals' part). If you remove them from power they'll just stop leasing that land to the government.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Kallisto View Post
    So if this is true why isn't there breaking news on BBC/Sky/ITV/ Basically any and all channels in the UK
    From what I've found online it seems to be based on a rumour, possibly based on a The Sun article from 2018 saying she "will step down at the age of 95". Can't find any good sources backing the story up though, but that's the earliest I could find with about 3 minutes of googling

  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by Kallisto View Post
    So if this is true why isn't there breaking news on BBC/Sky/ITV/ Basically any and all channels in the UK
    it was on the news yesterday.
    "You know you that bitch when you cause all this conversation."

  12. #12
    The Lightbringer Blade Wolf's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Futa Heaven
    Posts
    3,294
    Quote Originally Posted by gonza1 View Post
    Feels good being in America without no Monarchy. We also have amendment rights that limit governments power over us. Enjoy bowing down to the queen/king.

    #EuropeansTheSlaves.
    Nah you got corporate kings instead.
    "when i'm around you i'm like a level 5 metapod. all i can do is harden!"

    Quote Originally Posted by unholytestament View Post
    The people who cry for censorship aren't going to be buying the game anyway. Censoring it, is going to piss off the people who were going to buy it.
    Barret: It's a good thing we had those Phoenix Downs.
    Cloud: You have the downs!

  13. #13
    The Unstoppable Force PC2's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    California
    Posts
    21,877
    Where I'm from nobody cares about any of this unless there's an attractive princess involved, in which case they care a lot.

  14. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by Temp name View Post
    From what I've found online it seems to be based on a rumour, possibly based on a The Sun article from 2018 saying she "will step down at the age of 95". Can't find any good sources backing the story up though, but that's the earliest I could find with about 3 minutes of googling
    Yeah I saw when I googled it was sun, mirror, express, mail. None of which are worthy of being touched to wipe my arse with if I ran out of toilet paper they are so bad.

  15. #15
    this feels like fake news, if this were true it would be on every news outlet, cant find nothing

    oh apparently its just a rumor thats why, take it with a grain of salt

  16. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by funtwant View Post
    This is unfortunately representative of the British people. They are permanently brainwashed by very effective palace propaganda to the point of congenital idiocy.

    - - - Updated - - -



    If they are removed from power then we take their land in exchange for not killing them, or we kill them, same as with every revolution.

    They obtained the land through violence in the first place they have no particular right to it.

    And no we are not making money off them, they cost far more than they take in unless you do the bullshit creative accounting tricks the Palace spins out regularly.

    - - - Updated - - -



    I doubt it will beat the Royal Weddings. Charles isn't very popular, being old, ugly and widely condemned for carrying on with another woman behind his wife's back.
    Or maybe the Royals have no political power and bring in far more money to than they cost.

    They are a net gain in every way and hurt nothing. There is absolutely no reason to "do away" with them.

    Likewise, what land hasn't been gained via violence?
    World needs more Goblin Warriors https://i.imgur.com/WKs8aJA.jpg

  17. #17
    The Undying
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    the Quiet Room
    Posts
    34,554
    Quote Originally Posted by Monster Hunter View Post
    Charles would become Prince regant and wouldn't be crowned King untill the Queen dies or abdicate's so there won't be a coronation but power will essentially transfer to him.
    Is that how it will play out? No coronation? At what point or what event would trigger the coronation?

  18. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by Monster Hunter View Post
    UK liberals have no plans to remove the monarchy. No political party has any plans to, talking of such a thing is kind of illegal anyway though its only enforced if there's an actual threat.

    The whole thing is a legal messy mine field of century's of constitutional law that no one wants to deal with seriously and as they bring in more than they cost there's no incentive to go through that pain and potential civil unrest just to make some jealous socialist types feel better.
    pretty much this. Going republic won't be simple as "BTW Windsors fuck off." it'll be decades of legal drama and issues, higher costs (that could make brexit costs look low) and won't improve UK democracy since the democratic issues are in parliament.

  19. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by Kallisto View Post
    pretty much this. Going republic won't be simple as "BTW Windsors fuck off." it'll be decades of legal drama and issues, higher costs (that could make brexit costs look low) and won't improve UK democracy since the democratic issues are in parliament.
    "We need to do away with the royals!" is pretty much just what edgy ignorant people who arent aware of what the royals do say.
    World needs more Goblin Warriors https://i.imgur.com/WKs8aJA.jpg

  20. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by funtwant View Post
    This is unfortunately representative of the British people. They are permanently brainwashed by very effective palace propaganda to the point of congenital idiocy.

    - - - Updated - - -



    If they are removed from power then we take their land in exchange for not killing them, or we kill them, same as with every revolution.

    They obtained the land through violence in the first place they have no particular right to it.

    And no we are not making money off them, they cost far more than they take in unless you do the bullshit creative accounting tricks the Palace spins out regularly.

    - - - Updated - - -



    I doubt it will beat the Royal Weddings. Charles isn't very popular, being old, ugly and widely condemned for carrying on with another woman behind his wife's back.
    I though you buissy making post about how America was no 1 soc boi?

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by cubby View Post
    Is that how it will play out? No coronation? At what point or what event would trigger the coronation?
    Death of the queen
    Or abdication (very highly unlikely)

    When a monarch is nolonger fit to preform the dutys (like age(too old or too young) , disability, madness or away fighting a war) a regent is named usualy the next in line or the uncle if its a case of the king being too young

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Kallisto View Post
    pretty much this. Going republic won't be simple as "BTW Windsors fuck off." it'll be decades of legal drama and issues, higher costs (that could make brexit costs look low) and won't improve UK democracy since the democratic issues are in parliament.
    Yea basicly this.
    The monarch has no role anymore in active day to day politics and the bring in more than they cost and there's Alot of legal constitutional red-tape.

    People are split mostly between support the monarchy or don't care with only an extream minority in favor of removing them and usualy they can't make a good case for it without looking like jealous little toddlers.
    Last edited by Monster Hunter; 2019-11-30 at 11:15 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •