Necromancet and tinker confirmed for classic, right after players realize bosses are mathematically unkillable, the 2 classes will be required.
Multiple teams reassigned to deal with the workload, what did they do? Put more coal into the servers?
Necromancet and tinker confirmed for classic, right after players realize bosses are mathematically unkillable, the 2 classes will be required.
Multiple teams reassigned to deal with the workload, what did they do? Put more coal into the servers?
Let's because the mods don't react to threads they don't like with "ITS A TROLL". A leak is only a leak until it's proven otherwise. There have been many leaks and yet most have some grain of truth in them. This thread is a discussion of this leak, not an exercise where you want to stomp on other people's freedoms to express themselves. I see nothing in OP that I indicates that rules have been broken. Imagination? Maybe. I would have thought so too just one week ago. But now we have a game changing rule come out that goes completely against Blizzards previous position. PvP has a PvP solution. Are you really going to bet against them increasing the difficulty of BWL to make more money?
TBH one of the things I like about Classic raids is that they ARE simpler than retail. Retail moved to crazy special effects all over for every fight and a ton of things to keep track of (I guess to help the e-sport stuff) and it's sometimes a bit much, even on LFR. Classic is more relaxed, at least MC and Ony. The mechanics themselves aren't difficult, it's just execution matters.
How has this gone on for 7 pages without any mod locking it?
They already had rules against using the interview for political reasons...hence he got a fine and a ban. They went and reduced the ban and I believe the fine. He broke the rules and although I agree with the idea behind speaking up about Hong Kong, he even admitted he knew it was going to get him banned and he did it anyway.
Source? Re:2 holds that title at the moment. But obviously you will twist and squirm and somehow put that into a different catagory, and continue to do exactly that until only classic remains. That's how classic fanatics work - eliminate all comparables until none remain, and then proclaim classic the Victor.
- - - Updated - - -
See, this is why no one takes fanbois seriously. You lot are honestly like flat earthers.
- - - Updated - - -
Hmmmmm, you might want to just check the reason he was banned. I see this explanation a lot, but when you look it up, the reason provided by blizzard for their actions is pretty flimsy.
1) There isn't actually such a "massive" drop-off. There is a definite drop-off, but it's not a cliff.
2) Funnily, the drop-off is actually MUCH tamer than the one which come after the usual "new expansion" peak. Even with already-known content and MC being barely a paper gate, the population is actually surprisingly stable.
So... yeah.
What should it be locked for? Do you consider it negative towards classic in some way? Is that against the rules? Do you feel personally offended in some way? Or do you just not like it? If it's the latter, I have AMAZING news for you.
- - - Updated - - -
Where are you getting this "data"? You talk like you have detailed knowledge of the Exodus of players? Because your opinion goes against those begging for server mergers, constant talk of dead servers, and second hand data like forum viewership and online viewership.
It's very clear classic has lost an astonishing amount of players, and as I have said a dozen times, that was to be expected, and is totally fine. It would seem it was possibly greater than blizzard anticipated. If you follow the threads on here and other forums, it's easy to see why.