Originally Posted by
Skulltaker
General guideline, when you're asking the same question as The Don, you probably lack any quantifiable knowledge to understand the topic you're asking about and the answer you might be given.
"The cure cannot be worse than the problem" is a medical principal, and medicine can be incredibly cruel, cold and calculating. If you want an example, look to Spain, where, reportedly, doctors are forced to remove ventilators from older patients in favor of younger ones. And medicine is not above sacrificing to save the bigger picture, with the patients consent, of course.
But a virus is not a rotting limb, and it doesn't kill 'the feeble' only, they are just significantly more likely to die from exposure to, well, anything. And before we start sacrificing in medicine, we exhaust all other options.
And we're not talking about saving one percent, we're talking about saving many, many more people. Because if you bump infection rates, there won't be enough ventilators to save all of the 'healthy' people in critical condition. A virus infects and kills indiscriminately. As it currently stands and develops, with the average social circle we have in the west, you're likely to lose one acquaintance to Cocid-19 within the next year. So, whom amongst your family, friends and coworkers would you be willing to 'not make the cut'?
You're kidding, right? Marijuana isn't 'generally good' for you, it doesn't help with respiratory distress whatsoever, especially when you smoke it. Just because something is 'medicinal' doesn't mean it's nothing but beneficial to you.
Of course not. Who remembers things like the Black Death or the Spanish Flu?