But its also their freedom to choose as a human right if they want to see you. If they are willing to take the risk, and are of sound mind to do so, who are you to tell them no? If you want to be by someones side while they pass and you are willing to take the risk, why are people being denied access to see loved ones? Yall really enjoy being part of a communist state bit have such hatred for Russia.
Everything you do has a chance to fuck up other peoples lives. How did we let our government take away our right to spend one of our loveed ones last moments with them? When did we accept that the hospitals with no loved ones around to advocate for them just accepted they have their best interest in mind?
So your not willing to stay inside for a few months along with everyone else and insure a decrease in the spread of the virus, something places like South Korea have done so and reduced the spread, because you feel its more important to pretend things are normal and 'it's just a little virus'.
Seeing the kinds of degenerates on the news going against social distancing is one thing, but having one here us just glorious!
Have you arranged for your family to have private rooms when they become sick? I wonder if that extends to all the people you pass in the street.
Oh and you might want to arrange a basket of oranges for the old lady who cant have a bed because they ran out when your taking one up instead, I'm sure that'll make everything better.
#boycottchina
Sylvanas didn't even win the popular vote, she was elected by an indirect election of representatives. #NotMyWarchief
What are you even talking about. This isn’t the outcome for the majority of cases or even a large minority. Stop talking nonsense.
- - - Updated - - -
People have been convicted for intentionally spreading AIDS, same principle I’d imagine.
- - - Updated - - -
Neither are parental rights but that’s also a thing. Don’t be dense.
There isn't enough information on the recovered cases to know exactly the continuing cost of care and physical therapy to the severe scarring of people's lungs. Long term debilitating effects of clot formation and low oxygen levels are not known, however in line with other diseases that attack upper respiratory systems, most of the recovered cases will have perpetual healthcare needs brought upon by this virus.
- - - Updated - - -
A certain percentage of recovered cases. The world does not yet know the full extent, however medical experts are already preparing for long term care and therapy for these recovered cases.
No it doesnt. If it effected every person this way yes i would advocate for a full lock down, but big news for you the majority of people who contract this dont even know they have it. The only reason they know its not the common cold of flu is because we test for it. Now yes it effects a very small percentage of healthy people in a severe way. You issue must be as with many people here they have underlying conditions. If you dont then there is a very minute chance that you will die or even end up hospitalized or you may catch it and never even know you had it.
- - - Updated - - -
If the antibody tests are even close to reliable 40x more people have had it than previously known. Meaning many do not even have symptoms or are very minor. Meaning your fear mongering.
Must be something in the water...
- - - Updated - - -
Did you even read your source?
The Pennsylvania thing was a glitch, since corrected. The New York deaths are legitimate probables.
And now you're in fantasy, make-believe land, where your hyperbolic imagination has taken flight and invented scenarios that don't exist just to try to prop up your failed argument.
There's no evidence this is "clearly happening everywhere". And the fact that you think it does really indicates to everyone just how little you are in touch with reality.
Except that since nobody is listening to your "advocating", it will be of less effect than said "tin of beans". You're literally wasting your breath instead of being productive, and being proud of it.
"The difference between stupidity
and genius is that genius has its limits."
--Alexandre Dumas-fils
Literally not a human right. Which is why governments can quarantine infectious people.
This has fuck-all to do with communist economics. If you mean "totalitarianism", use that word, not "communism".If you want to be by someones side while they pass and you are willing to take the risk, why are people being denied access to see loved ones? Yall really enjoy being part of a communist state bit have such hatred for Russia.
Here's a hot tip; it's just as easy (arguably easier) for capitalist societies to become totalitarian.
Again, literally not a right anyone actually has.
You don't get to just make shit up and pretend it's a right, dude.
No, it means you're playing down the danger posed by this virus, and the net effect is that you're trying to get millions more people killed than would otherwise happen.
Even if those figures are correct, it doesn't change the death count. It changes the infectious capacity. And given that we've seen little evidence of any lasting immunity, if this goes unchecked, we'll pretty quickly hit a point where the entire population is continually sick with this virus, with brief windows when you recover before your antibody count declines and you catch it again. And each time, the virus will do a little more damage, and render you more vulnerable to more severe outcomes the next time around.
You're arguing for a world where everyone is sick with this thing for months out of every year, forever, for the rest of their lives, and every time they catch it, it's an escalating chance that this'll be the time it kills them. It's far more virulent than standard influenza, and has a higher mortality rate. This is not a good outcome, and asking more people to die because fuck it, you want some minor comforts and conveniences, that's misanthropic in the extreme.
And that's presuming you're right about everything. If you're not, it's so much worse.
I was wondering where I would find the worst baseless fear-mongering spread of misinformation about this virus, I wonder why I didn't though about MMO-C first. When it's well know that most people get the virus 0 symptom, only someone who frequent this forum often will say such idiocy.
MMO-Champion, once the place to get WoW News, now the home of the haters and their clickbait and doomsaying threads
Whilst our actions can have unintended consequences, there is probability attached to them, as such most of us can go about our lives without fear of accidentally ruining the life of someone else.
Most of us accepted that some people now have to die alone because letting people in, with an infectious disease being spread around, could mean that people who might not die will. You are aware that this is infectious? And not just a little. You let a family in to spend time with a loved one on the way out with COVID, and there is a realistic chance that one or more of them could be in that death bed in a few weeks time, or spread it to someone else and their family have to go through it. Not to mention that people going in could be carriers, putting others in the hospital at risk.
No one is limiting access to hospitals out of spite. The people in hospitals are aware of the impact this has on people, but recognise that it is a necessity to diminish the spread of the virus. The people who work in these places, the more folk that come in, the greater the chance that they get infected. It is not unreasonable to seek to protect front line healthcare workers as much as possible, nor is it an act of tyranny.