You are projecting hard with "The selective quoting"
You falsely claimed that the quotes were from Oxford University not Sky News, so you are clearly incapable of telling them apart.
The paper and the press-release from Oxford University,
https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2021-02-02...month-interval only state that the vaccine
may reduce transmission of the disease.
That's not selling enough for Sky News and therefore they change that to "does stop transmission".
This is the constant problem with reporting of scientific news: caveats like "may" are dropped, "reduce" is changed to "stop", etc.
The scientists are not free from blame - there are two particular issues: inaccurate numbers are reported as true (the reports of various efficacy numbers is a clear example), and with large studies that don't go as planned they come up with ideas afterwards.
Such "post-hoc exploratory analyses" (as it is called in the paper) have a larger risk of producing inaccurate results than normal studies -
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Testin...ed_by_the_data
The researchers are obviously aware of that, and in particular the paper suggest that the earlier idea of small dose followed by normal dose was exactly such an incorrect conclusion.
The Oxford press release does not contain the word "stop" either.
As for "protection not falling" it is from the press release, but not fully supported by the paper as I wrote.
It seems clear that you live in an alternate reality, so don't expect an answer to any reply.