True, but not what I am arguing.
Of course not, but I don't have to, because that has nothing to do with the definition of "pay to win".
"pay to win" means, quite literally, that there is a fundamental relationship between paying money to the game and winning. You either pay, or you don't win.
The fundamental (and only) reason why tokens are not "pay to win" is that the gold you get from a token comes from another players. When you spend $$ to buy some gold, it's not the game that gives you the gold. It's another player.
Now I am not trying to pretend that getting the aid of another isn't advantageous, and could even be necessary to win. I am also not arguing that this aid can't be obtained by means of a monetary transaction. What I am saying though is that this is not "pay to win".
- - - Updated - - -
Nothing you have said up to this point demonstrates any engagement with what I have said though. So while you might think you understand, you clearly do not.
- - - Updated - - -
That's some twisted logic you're trying to apply there mate.