That right there might be too much credit to op. They just wanted to stir the pot, so created a thread with conspiracy theorist level reaching, and then abandoned it. Rational people would realize that Blizzard is working ahead, but if OP hopes they stir up just a few people who are clamouring for news of SL being a failure or such they will view it as a win.
We live in an era of "me versus them", an era where something is done that you don't like means you are personally attacked. People whine too much.
Let us play video games and be happy.
Wow! Not a good look. A Q3/Q4 2021 release is seeming more than likely.
with months left on shadowlands it's unlikely that they have already really started on a post shadowlands patch. what is likely however is that some stuff they are working on and intending to release with shadowlands won't be ready in time and will get bumped to post-launch, that's how those things tend to play out
If you've ever been part of an alpha, you'd know just how much remains to be built and deployed and tweaked repeatedly throughout the process even much later than this. All those efforts require development resources.
And that's even before the addition of content patches which bring their own new systems.
Do you people not realize that they didn't fire any of their developers working on games, right?
The only thing worth to take away for me are the two openings for WoW Classic, which gives a lot more room for speculation regarding TBC servers.
Whether these actually are for that is as said speculation, but i don't think Classic right now requires additional manpower in form of new full time employees, considering that the only major event left on Classic is the AQ opening, which should happen in a few months.
Last edited by Kralljin; 2020-02-26 at 05:40 PM.
If offered a job at Actiblizzion right now...I'd probably respectfully decline.
Why shouldn't there a reason, i would reckon Blizzard has leapfrogging teams for expansions where you have a team on the current expansion, the next expansion and the expansion thereafter (and possible even further along the road).
I see why this would be a sign of ppl quitting because they "don't approve", it is possible, but there are a lot more reasons why companies would be hiring.
You need 3 months minimum, but practically around 6 for the developer to start "paying off". Depending on the complexity of the enviroment, maybe even more.
But people really need to consider that the team at Blizzard is big and some employee rotation will happen.
Not everything is a sign that Blizzard has issues.
Snarky: Adjective - Any language that contains quips or comments containing sarcastic or satirical witticisms intended as blunt irony. Usually delivered in a manner that is somewhat abrupt and out of context and intended to stun and amuse.
Yawn, conspiracies are so fun.
Positions in these departments have not been subjected to layoffs in the past and they won't be in the future until the ship is finally sinking and it will be the newest people laid off first in that case. If you know anything about engineering, for instance, you would know the demand is much greater than the supply and even if a company wanted to dick around with fair labor practices it is not even close to being worth the risk. You really want to tank morale among a group of people who can literally go out and get another job tomorrow by making one call? Also a tenured engineer tends to be worth more productivity per dollar than a new engineer so what you're suggesting would make zero sense.
--- Want any of my Constitutional rights?, ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
I come from a time and a place where I judge people by the content of their character; I don't give a damn if you are tall or short; gay or straight; Jew or Gentile; White, Black, Brown or Green; Conservative or Liberal. -- Note to mods: if you are going to infract me have the decency to post the reason, and expect to hold everyone else to the same standard.