https://www.thenational.ae/world/asi...-ends-1.987043
So they're going to resume attempting to take over Afghanistan. I'm guessing Afghanistan being told to hand over 5k taliban prisoners without their consent aint happening.
While you live, shine / Have no grief at all / Life exists only for a short while / And time demands its toll.
“Do not lose time on daily trivialities. Do not dwell on petty detail. For all of these things melt away and drift apart within the obscure traffic of time. Live well and live broadly. You are alive and living now. Now is the envy of all of the dead.” ~ Emily3, World of Tomorrow
Words to live by.
I think this is a very......naive view of the Taliban.
The Taliban was just al Qaeda writ as a formal government of a very tribal country. It's what an al Qaeda government would look like. The main difference was the Taliban didn't have the reach al Qaeda did, mainly because their leader wasn't a Saudi playboy-turned-terrorist who could help fund them from SA, and have ties to the CIA.
So philosophically - just as bad. Functionally - much smaller reach than al Qaeda.
I seriously doubt Putin would bite on that one.
Afghanistan was the USSRs Vietnam/Afghanistan/Iraq all in one. I doubt the Russians would want a rematch of Afghanistan 2: The Electric Boogaloo, but now against fanatics that are even more experienced and battle hardened.
I agree that we shouldn't be there. What infuriates me is that a few dozen companies are walking away from this much richer than before while many thousands of people have died for no fucking reason. Had the war ended nine years ago we'd have the same result as what we're about to get.
World needs more Goblin Warriors https://i.imgur.com/WKs8aJA.jpg
lol, I'm brown myself, and immigrated to the States from a country just on the other side of Pakistan.
I'd love to hear what you think are the philosophical differences between al Qaeda and the Taliban. Even though the Taliban doesn't formally practice Wahhabism, they have, in practice, been just as draconian, just as literal, and just as strict in their (Sunni) Islamic interpretations.
Like I said, studying the Taliban is like a study in how one would go applying the terror tactics of al Qaeda into a national government of people.
Pretty sure they did that in 1979, it started okay at first but then the USA started arming/bankrolling the Taliban and the country went to hell. No way Russia would want a replay of that, not after having just seen the USA lose there too.
Also the USSR shared a border with Afghanistan so just sitting back and letting US backed extremists take over would have been a bad idea, by comparison Russia is over 1300km from Afghanistan, so letting some non-US affiliated extremists take over a country 1300km away isn't nearly as daunting a prospect.
Last edited by caervek; 2020-03-03 at 08:35 PM.
US launches air strikes against the Taliban.
"How many days was that?"
Five. It was five days after the not-really-a-cease-fire.
EDIT: Oh, right, Trump said literally yesterday he had a bigly yuge relationship with the Taliban.
We’ve agreed there’s no violence. We don’t want violence. We’ll see what happens.
Last edited by Breccia; 2020-03-04 at 12:52 PM.
With terrorists. That part's important. Yeah, I know, he won't say it, but it needs to be said.
There's no telling what's next, but for now at least, I don't know which is worse:
1) Trump intentionally negotiating with terrorists, or
2) Trump failing at diplomacy yet again.
Isn't standard operating procedure when the US "leaves" they cut down to a few thousand [military] "advisors"?
"america is like irish relatives, we never leave!" -Bill Maher