Absolutely not, Tanaan Jungle was considerably worse.
Nope. 4.3 still holds that title, 6.2 wouldn't be far off but HFC was a pretty good raid so it makes up for it although i'd still place 6.2 below 8.3.
- - - Updated - - -
Has nothing to do with Cataclysm being Cataclysm, take away DS and Cata was great, DS is what makes Cata look shit. The entire patch, minus transmog, was complete dogshit with no redeeming factors, I'm sorry that you believe DS was good in any way, your taste must be horrible to think a 8 boss raid with only 1 decent fight that wasn't a pushover lasting a year was a good thing.
Why are ya'll wasting your time with OP when they are just going to continue to create troll threads until they get enough attention?
This is basically a weekly thing with them.
im playing 100x more than i have siege of orgrimmar and cataclysm, and wod, i think i actually quit halfway through the wod and siege drought, i actualy played more during legion. its all relative follks, legion was better but this is way better than siege, and even dragon soul
I might remember wrong but think that was because of all the negative feedback they got in Wotlk about the Lich King showing up all too often, saying something edgy and then just leave, even though that kinda made sense since he was training us to be his champions.
Even if BFA is dogshit Dragon Soul patch will probably never be dethroned in the worst one competition.
It's amazing how this troll op started 7 pages of discussion.
Every single one here defending Cata's last patch has either never played it or a bad memory. Boring raid, one-time dungeons, no content whatsoever. I was lucky back then having a raid guild to raid DS at least, but we didn't have fun with it, especially compared to FL.