Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect. There is nothing more or else to it, and there never has been, in any place or time. --Frank Wilhoit
Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect. There is nothing more or else to it, and there never has been, in any place or time. --Frank Wilhoit
On MMO-C we learn that Anti-Fascism is locking arms with corporations, the State Department and agreeing with the CIA, But opposing the CIA and corporate America, and thinking Jews have a right to buy land and can expect tenants to pay rent THAT is ultra-Fash Nazism. Bellingcat is an MI6/CIA cut out. Clyburn Truther.
https://twitter.com/hashtag/firechri...twgr%5Ehashtag
Biden supporters sounding an awful lot like trump supporters lately. Wanting to fire a journalist for covering the facts about something. Btw, the segment in which he covered this he pretty much just recited the timeline of the allegations. Glad to see though that some people have no problem trying to hand wave sexual assault allegations because "Russia!!!!"
I did...wow, that's interesting. I don't see any posts from me doing that. I guess those delusions of yours are getting worse.
You still haven't shown the sexual assault charges. You just linked names. If you want to prove your point you'll need to show evidence. A list of names isn't evidence. And just as a heads up - this is the article you used for those names. And it proves demonstrably how wrong you are.
Thanks for playing though - we all knew you were wrong, it was just nice to see you prove it.
- - - Updated - - -
I said in the post I was just citing the analysis of the author - which is why I put the caveat up in the first place. I know Dailykos isn't a good source, but I'm not using it as a source - just as a summary. I linked the article because I didn't want to, ahem, plagiarize.
- - - Updated - - -
It's all he has as an unwitting Trump supporter, ignorance and now lies.
Those people attacking the journalist are wrong. The narrative of the Reada allegations, however, has a number of large holes in it.
- - - Updated - - -
So no list of sexual assault allegations? Gotcha. At this point, claiming that Biden has a history of sexual assault, is a lie. And you just proved you know it's a lie, too.
Oh, hey - speaking of proof, where did I call those women liars again? We're still waiting for that link.![]()
Today's Defense: Donald TrumpJoe Biden was never tried and convicted so none of the allegations against him matter.
Today's hypocrisy - Lil Cox'y can't prove his point. Biden was never charged with anything? Do we have that right? Sexual assault, right?
We're all still waiting for those links of charges brought against him. Any time....
And why do you keep lying about people's posts. I never called those women liars. And I never said their allegations don't matter. Please stop being so dishonest and disingenuous in your posts - you sound like a Trumpster at this point.
Stuff Trump supporters say: "Its just locker room talk"
Stuff Biden supporters say: "He was just being friendly".
Still can't prove any of your points I see. It's really sad when someone posts all these lies and can't be intellectually honest enough to admit they are wrong. But hey, at least you're helping Trump win with your lies, right? You got that going for you.
Still waiting on those links I asked for. Shout if you forgot.
What we are trying generously to explain to you is that what those women described, with the exception of Tara Reade's expanded account, is not sexual assault. Not that they're lying, and not that their accounts don't appear elsewhere--those actions are not what the words sexual assault encompass, the same way jaywalking is not breaking and entering.
https://definitions.uslegal.com/s/sexual-assault/
Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect. There is nothing more or else to it, and there never has been, in any place or time. --Frank Wilhoit