Folly and fakery have always been with us... but it has never before been as dangerous as it is now, never in history have we been able to afford it less. - Isaac Asimov
Every damn thing you do in this life, you pay for. - Edith Piaf
The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. - Orwell
No amount of belief makes something a fact. - James Randi
"The difference between stupidity
and genius is that genius has its limits."
--Alexandre Dumas-fils
Forgive my english, as i'm not a native speaker
A federal judge gave USPS inspectors until 3 pm ET to find and ship any ballots that were just piled up in a corner.
USPS responds that they just didn't want to do it.
Hey, I'll admit that if someone told me, all of a sudden, "you have to organize the search today and complete it by 3:00" I'd say something similar. But the USPS intentonally slowed itself down, for example, dismantling mail sorting machines on purpose. If it's your fault you lost all those ballots, you don't get to complain you weren't given enough time to find the ballots you lost, especially if you did it on purpose.Given the time constraints set by this Court's order, and the fact that Postal Inspectors operate on a nationwide basis, Defendants were unable to accelerate the daily review process to run from 12:30 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. without significantly delaying preexisting activities on the day of the election
The order was for Pennsylvania, Michigan, Colorado, Wyoming, Georgia, Texas, Alabama, Arizona, New England, South Carolina and Florida. Bolded states don't have a deadline tonight. I don't think anyone has doubts about New England or South Carolina. But that's a lot of battlegrounds to be decided by the USPS intentionally sabotaging itself, losing ballots, shrugging and saying "well I guess they don't matter anymore".
"Okay, but it's not like the motive was race-based or--"
The lawsuit was filed by the NAACP. That's exactly what the accusation is.
Just for reference, 2016 results for IN and KY:
IN 2016 margin: 56% Trump, 37% Hillary
KY 2016 margin: 63% Trump, 33% Hillary
Anything lower is bad for Trump.
Forgive my english, as i'm not a native speaker
DOW casts vote for Trump, closing up for the day.
"Wrong thread."
No no, the DOW tends to favor the incumbent.
"That's the S&P you idiot."
Okay fine, but the S&P also closed up.The stock market’s performance won’t definitively determine who wins the White House, especially in a year as unpredictable as 2020. History, however, shows the incumbent has a clear advantage when the market rallies in the months preceding Election Day.
Going back to 1928, incumbent presidents, or candidates from the controlling party, have won nearly 90% of elections when the S&P 500 is positive in the previous three months, according to brokerage firm BTIG.
“That is about as close to unequivocal as you are ever going to get,” said BTIG analyst Julian Emanuel, who researched the history.
"By literally one percent. What you're seeing in a single-day move is just a prediction there will be a clear winner."
"If anything, this is good news for Biden. Since the polls favor him, any prediction about a clear winner leans in his direction. And it's not like the last jobs report helped -- it showed a slowing recovery. And don't forget, the DOW also closed up Tues, Nov 6, 2018."Wall Street ended Election Day on a high, buoyed by investor hopes that a clear winner would be declared in the presidential election and that a fiscal stimulus deal would be swiftly passed.
The Dow Jones Industrial Average closed up by 552 points, after gaining as much as 715 points at its session high. The S&P 500 and the Nasdaq both ended the day up by1.8 percent each. Tuesday's close represented the second-best performance on a presidential Election Day.
“Ultimately, the markets want clarity, and the main threat this week is the emergence of a contested election,” Tom Essaye, founder of The Sevens Report and a stock market analyst, wrote in a note. "If races are tight enough for campaigns to sue to halt or extend recounts, expect a reversal."
While investors are typically lukewarm about the prospect of a Democratic government, the pandemic has changed that. A "blue wave," wherein Democrats gain control of the White House and both chambers, is seen as far more likely to implement a large stimulus plan.
That would mean financial relief for the millions of workers who lost their job during shutdowns meant to halt the spread of the coronavirus, and whose additional unemployment benefits expired at the end of July. A new round of emergency aid would encourage consumer spending, spur economic growth, and boost market confidence.
Well, we'll see. I'm not of the mindset that the stock market going up means "the person who gives rich people lots of tax breaks loses".
Guam cannot officially vote but they did a straw poll. In 2016, Trump got 24%. In 2020, Trump jumped up to 43%.
https://www.postguam.com/news/local/...e3881deba.html