Did you complain about this sort of thing then?
Don't think so...
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.the...ackdown-occupy
Where? In fact, many of the policies that Obama did to try to stem police brutality were overturned by Trump. Obama never explicitly promoted police brutality like trump has (multiple tones) and in fact what little Obama tried to do (you know having a beer with an officer and a black man that was accosted for entering his own house) was met with derision.
Yes, police brutality is bi-partisan, but can you show any evidence of what you’re saying?
- - - Updated - - -
Yes! Why do you like to lie?
Accelerationists are very mad about Trump losing. After 4 8 years of Trump, they were expecting to be leading revolutionary armies.
But it's another 4 years of podcasts and shrinking patreon numbers.
Also, CyberPunk was delayed again. So they cant even roleplay their dystopian badassness for a few more months. That ruined their entire Christmas vacation plans of being 'jacked in'.
Last edited by AntiFascistVoter; 2020-11-18 at 03:46 PM.
Government Affiliated Snark
So to "prove" your ridiculous claim that Democrats gave Obama a pass on police brutality, you link to an article by someone--who at least used to ostensibly be on the left--condemning it, citing evidence from a progressive, anti-police brutality legal fund not to mention truthout.org (!), as your way to demonstrate Democrats supported a police crackdown on...Occupy Wall St. I think you've embarrassed yourself sufficiently for the day.
Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect. There is nothing more or else to it, and there never has been, in any place or time. --Frank Wilhoit
Not linking, fuck Trump.
Yes it was immediately flagged.In Detroit, there are FAR MORE VOTES THAN PEOPLE. Nothing can be done to cure that giant scam. I win Michigan!
Trump tweets are not evidence.
Trump tweets do not hold legal value.
"When police deployed military-style equipment during the protests after the death of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri in 2014, critics said the gear added to friction between law enforcement and demonstrators, and could be an incitement to violence. The Obama administration placed limits on the federal military surplus program, which had already supplied free gear, including MRAPs, to thousands of departments.
But the Trump administration lifted those barriers in 2017, and the distribution of military gear began to rise again. With the Floyd protests, experts — and some members of Congress — are again raising objections to the "militarization" of the police."
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...other-n1231288
You'll note the words "in 2014, critics," "renew debate," and "are again raising objections," not to mention "Obama administration placed limits." Out of idle curiosity, why do you support a worldview that requires you to lie constantly?
Last edited by Levelfive; 2020-11-18 at 04:09 PM.
Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect. There is nothing more or else to it, and there never has been, in any place or time. --Frank Wilhoit