Mega-Thread: 2020 United States General Election

[BigStones]

Completely agree, nobody makes alt accounts for honest discussion. Especially in regards to politics. Just another lying burner account, reported and hopefully gone soon. They all have the credibility of Larry Nassar.

Better: Nobody makes an account for honest discussion. Especially in regards to politics. Just another lying account. They all have the credibility of Trump.

- - - Updated - - -

Man, look at the spam of burner accounts we have rolling today.

We have two burner accounts, admitted troll accounts, and Trumpsters pretending to be Bernie supporters.

Good to see you call yourself a troll account then.

[Machismo]

Better: Nobody makes an account for honest discussion. Especially in regards to politics. Just another lying account. They all have the credibility of Trump.

- - - Updated - - -



Good to see you call yourself a troll account then.

Evidence, please.

[BigStones]

Evidence, please.

Point proven

[Machismo]

Point proven

Well, making baseless claims seems to be a pretty common occurrence for burner accounts. Have a lovely day!!!

[BigStones]

Well, making baseless claims seems to be a pretty common occurrence for burner accounts. Have a lovely day!!!

Well, making baseless claims seems to be a pretty common occurrence for 44k posts accounts. Have a lovely day!!!

[Machismo]

Well, making baseless claims seems to be a pretty common occurrence for 44k posts accounts. Have a lovely day!!!

Except, I provided you with evidence...

Your refusal to address evidence is not the same as that evidence not existing. It's a lot like people who think the Earth is flat, even though there's plenty of evidence to the contrary. Willful ignorance is a self-inflicted wound.

[BigStones]

Except, I provided you with evidence...

Your refusal to address evidence is not the same as that evidence not existing. It's a lot like people who think the Earth is flat, even though there's plenty of evidence to the contrary. Willful ignorance is a self-inflicted wound.

Somebody only replying with "evidence" or "you support Trump" (in any variant) or whataboutism is not to be taken seriously. Your list of posters included troll accounts. I guess your friends who posted today wouldn't like you to call them trolls, so I guess you were talking about yourself. Added to that, you have added nothing substantial to the conversation, as trolls do.

[beanman12345]

Better: Nobody makes an account for honest discussion. Especially in regards to politics. Just another lying account. They all have the credibility of Trump.

- - - Updated - - -



Good to see you call yourself a troll account then.

No most of us are here for honest discussion, but thanks for outting yourself as not, and proving my point. Way to fail big there.

[BigStones]

No most of us are here for honest discussion, but thanks for outting yourself as not, and proving my point. Way to fail big there.

It shows, with all the whataboutisms, the insults, the repeating 1000 times of the same. A honest discussion would be accepting others with a different opinion to voice those. Anybody not supporting or criticizing Biden is to be ridiculed and automatically a Trump supporter. So much for honest. Way to fail big here, claiming you want a honest discussion.

[beanman12345]

It shows, with all the whataboutisms, the insults, the repeating 1000 times of the same. A honest discussion would be accepting others with a different opinion to voice those. Anybody not supporting the Democratic candidate is to be ridiculed and automatically a Trump supporter. So much for honest.

Ok you go have yourself a little pity party.

[BigStones]

Ok you go have yourself a little pity party.

Point proven Not here for a honest discussion, are you? Hypocrite. Sometimes you could wish for some moderation like a few years back. When they enforced forum rules. But these days...

[beanman12345]

Point proven Not here for a honest discussion, are you? Hypocrite. Sometimes you could wish for some moderation like a few years back. When they enforced forum rules. But these days...

No, I've already stated, honest discussion with a burner isn't possible.

[BigStones]

No, I've already stated, honest discussion with a burner isn't possible.

Lol, posts like "Well, I guess that's the difference between us, I'm not a trump supporter like you" to a long time poster are "a honest discussion" too I guess (and I can provide 1000's of posts like this, if you want).

[beanman12345]

Lol, posts like "Well, I guess that's the difference between us, I'm not a trump supporter like you" to a long time poster are "a honest discussion" too I guess (and I can provide 1000's of posts like this, if you want).

Nah don't care. You yourself stated you have the credibility of Trump. So yeah. Since you've gone over the 20 posts and are appearing just gonna report you one last time and put ya on ignore. Ciao.

[BigStones]

Nah don't care. You yourself stated you have the credibility of Trump. So yeah. Since you've gone over the 20 posts and are appearing just gonna report you one last time and put ya on ignore. Ciao.

Oops, here you go wrong again. That would be Larry Nassar (according to you). YOU on the other hand have the credibility of Trump (according to me). Way to fail big here, not even remembering what you posted yourself.

And having a "honest discussion" while reporting and ignoring everybody you don't agree with. Amazing...

[Machismo]

Somebody only replying with "evidence" or "you support Trump" (in any variant) or whataboutism is not to be taken seriously. Your list of posters included troll accounts. I guess your friends who posted today wouldn't like you to call them trolls, so I guess you were talking about yourself. Added to that, you have added nothing substantial to the conversation, as trolls do.

I provided evidence, you ignored said evidence.

- - - Updated - - -

Lol, posts like "Well, I guess that's the difference between us, I'm not a trump supporter like you" to a long time poster are "a honest discussion" too I guess (and I can provide 1000's of posts like this, if you want).

Great, let's see them. Time to put your money where your mouth is.

[beanman12345]

I provided evidence, you ignored said evidence.

- - - Updated - - -



Great, let's see them. Time to put your money where your mouth is.

I think I did say that to Rochana, whom wouldn't ya know, is banned. But to your point no i don't have 1000's of posts like that.

[Machismo]

I think I did say that to Rochana, whom wouldn't ya know, is banned. But to your point no i don't have 1000's of posts like that.

Considering that poster got caught lying about his entire anti-rape narrative... there's not much more that needs to be said.

[Endus]

It shows, with all the whataboutisms, the insults, the repeating 1000 times of the same. A honest discussion would be accepting others with a different opinion to voice those. Anybody not supporting or criticizing Biden is to be ridiculed and automatically a Trump supporter. So much for honest. Way to fail big here, claiming you want a honest discussion.

People with different opinions post here just fine without catching that kind of flak. Hell, I'm a self-avowed liberal market socialist, further left than most Canadian politicians, let alone American, and the only real "ridicule" I get is from abusive right-wingers. Nobody's ever called me a "trump supporter", and I've criticize Biden plenty. I think he's essentially no different than Hillary Clinton, in that he packs a lot of baggage, and that even the whisper of Reade's accusation should be enough to get him to back out. Nobody's taken issue with me on these kinds of stances, really.

Here's the problem with your statement; nobody is owed any "acceptance" of their opinions. Your opinions will stand (or be blown apart) by the strengths of their merits (or lack thereof). If your opinions are constantly blown up by people presenting the facts, then the issue is that your opinions are baseless garbage that have no merit, and do not hold up to any scrutiny. Your willingness to hold and express such opinions then says fairly evident things about your own personal character and motives.

You're complaining that people are shining a light on you, because of what that light reveals to be true. It has nothing to do with "acceptance of others opinions". It has to do with the lack of merit to certain opinions, and how evident that lack of merit is to anyone with a shred of incredulity and critical thinking.

[BigStones]

I think I did say that to Rochana, whom wouldn't ya know, is banned. But to your point no i don't have 1000's of posts like that.

Another failure to read it seems. You can't remember what you wrote yourself too. How can you ever have a "honest discussion" if you fail to read what others write and don't remember what you write yourself? Or report and ignore everybody with a different opinion?

- - - Updated - - -

People with different opinions post here just fine without catching that kind of flak. Hell, I'm a self-avowed liberal market socialist, further left than most Canadian politicians, let alone American, and the only real "ridicule" I get is from abusive right-wingers. Nobody's ever called me a "trump supporter", and I've criticize Biden plenty. I think he's essentially no different than Hillary Clinton, in that he packs a lot of baggage, and that even the whisper of Reade's accusation should be enough to get him to back out. Nobody's taken issue with me on these kinds of stances, really.

Here's the problem with your statement; nobody is owed any "acceptance" of their opinions. Your opinions will stand (or be blown apart) by the strengths of their merits (or lack thereof). If your opinions are constantly blown up by people presenting the facts, then the issue is that your opinions are baseless garbage that have no merit, and do not hold up to any scrutiny. Your willingness to hold and express such opinions then says fairly evident things about your own personal character and motives.

You're complaining that people are shining a light on you, because of what that light reveals to be true. It has nothing to do with "acceptance of others opinions". It has to do with the lack of merit to certain opinions, and how evident that lack of merit is to anyone with a shred of incredulity and critical thinking.

This is untrue, and you know it. There are examples enough of posts that get ridiculed because of the posters who posts it, not the contents. Enough examples of posts like "That's bullshit from <xxxx>, can't be bothered to read it.", enough posts like "But you voted Trump".