1. #9421
    Void Lord Felya's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    the other
    Posts
    58,334
    Quote Originally Posted by Milchshake View Post
    Ok much better. I just got an ad for Virtual Mate.
    "Any celebrity that signs us copyright, could be your mate."

    I wonder if they have Jason Mamoa and Paul Rudd. Asking for a friend.
    That’s a spectrum... I now have ads for Landing Tree and Walgreens... As if I needed a reminder that I’m old...

    I didn’t mean it a shot against MMO champion... it’s a revolving ad service... It just seems like in general, there are a lot more Trump ads, than Biden. In fact, I see more senate democrat ads, than Biden... I was just using the site as an example, because at the moment, it was 2 Trump ads.
    Folly and fakery have always been with us... but it has never before been as dangerous as it is now, never in history have we been able to afford it less. - Isaac Asimov
    Every damn thing you do in this life, you pay for. - Edith Piaf
    The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. - Orwell
    No amount of belief makes something a fact. - James Randi

  2. #9422
    That ad, is that why the birdbrain are upset about that interview, that's what they saw? yikes.

  3. #9423
    Quote Originally Posted by Arch-Angel of Riots View Post
    Basically what I predicted, if true.
    I'll repost my post from the other thread then -

    Not terribly interested in a channel with

    "AOC TOTALLY REJETED"
    "4CHAN IDENTIFY ANTIFA THUG!"
    "MAXINE WATERS UNHINGED MELTDOWN"
    "TUCKER CARLSON OBLITERATES FAILING NBA RATINGS"
    "KAYLEIGH MECENANY NUKES ENTIRE DEMOCRAT ESTABLISHMERNT!"

    and more as their content. This is some right wing nonsense.

    Do you have a TLDR for the video with actual points? Not terribly interested in giving this guy a click and very likely some ad revenue.

    Also not terribly interested in what a far-right wing YT channel has to say about the reception of Kamala Harris to Democratic voters.

    Edit: I see you mentioned polling based on race which...doesn't seem to bear out as you/the video imply?

    https://www.politico.com/news/2020/0...vp-pick-394734

    Moreover, the pick earns high marks from key constituencies: Democrats (84 percent) overwhelmingly approve of Harris’ selection, as do Black voters (79 percent). Majorities of voters under age 35 (56 percent), 35-44 (61 percent) and 65 and older (55 percent) approve of Biden’s choice; only among voters aged 45-64 does the pick not earn majority support.
    Last edited by Edge-; 2020-08-18 at 10:21 PM.

  4. #9424

  5. #9425
    Why am I getting deja-vu? Seems like it was just yesterday we had a trumpster trying to spin a false narrative that kamala was a bad pick before getting curbstomped with actual data.

  6. #9426
    The Unstoppable Force Ghostpanther's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    USA, Ohio
    Posts
    24,111
    Quote Originally Posted by I Push Buttons View Post
    Lmao what the fuck is this?

    Lol! Awesome. Not seen that one before. Thanks for sharing.
    " If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher.." - Abraham Lincoln
    The Constitution be never construed to authorize Congress to - prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms..” - Samuel Adams

  7. #9427
    Old God AntiFascistVoter's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Shitposting Agasint Fascists
    Posts
    10,561
    Quote Originally Posted by beanman12345 View Post
    Why am I getting deja-vu? Seems like it was just yesterday we had a trumpster trying to spin a false narrative that kamala was a bad pick before getting curbstomped with actual data.
    That was ghostpanther lying about polling data from like 10 months ago.

    SO pretty much the same schitck. Weird how all these guys use the same alt-right strategies.

    ** lol speak of the ... anyone taking odds these guys organize on a discord channel?
    Government Affiliated Snark

  8. #9428
    Quote Originally Posted by Milchshake View Post
    That was ghostpanther lying about polling data from like 10 months ago.

    SO pretty much the same schitck. Weird how all these guys use the same alt-right strategies.

    ** lol speak of the ... anyone taking odds these guys organize on a discord channel?
    Shame we just can't have any honesty from them.

  9. #9429
    Quote Originally Posted by beanman12345 View Post
    Why am I getting deja-vu? Seems like it was just yesterday we had a trumpster trying to spin a false narrative that kamala was a bad pick before getting curbstomped with actual data.
    I wouldn't mind repeat performances of that show, if people like @Arch-Angel of Riots had the decency to be embarassed, but that would require them to be actual human beings, rather than personae.
    “There you stand, the good man doing nothing. And while evil triumphs, and your rigid pacifism crumbles to blood stained dust, the only victory afforded to you is that you stuck true to your guns.”

  10. #9430
    Quote Originally Posted by Arch-Angel of Riots View Post
    https://twitter.com/PpollingNumbers/...55505564966912

    A CNN poll shows a 10 point shift towards Trump right after Kamala was chosen as VP.

    https://twitter.com/PpollingNumbers/...970909185?s=20

    And a 21 point shift towards Trump the days right after Kamala was chosen as VP.

    Non-white voters:
    Biden 63% (-11)
    Trump 31% (+10)

    The strong dislike among non-white voters for Kamala seems based on this analysis on non-white voter preferences from 2019: https://poll.qu.edu/national/release...ReleaseID=3637
    Where the support for Kamala imploded down to 1%.
    Let's look at that poll you just linked

    https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/16/polit...ust/index.html

    Kamala Harris seen as a good pick

    Harris joins the ticket with a narrowly positive favorability rating (41% have a favorable view, 38% unfavorable), which is an improvement since May when 32% of Americans said they had a positive view of her and 33% a negative one.

    Biden's selection of Harris is rated as excellent or pretty good by most (52%), and 57% say it reflects favorably on Biden's ability to make important presidential decisions. Most say she is qualified to be president should that be necessary (57%). And a majority, 62%, say her selection does not have much effect on their vote. People of color, though, are more likely than White people to say her selection makes them more likely to back Biden (28% among people of color, 18% among whites).
    Compared with other recent Democratic running mates, Harris fares well. The 30% who call her selection excellent outpaces the share who said so in CNN polling on John Edwards in 2004, Biden in 2008, Joe Lieberman in 2000 or Tim Kaine in 2016. And the 57% who say she is qualified to serve as president if that becomes necessary is only topped by Biden (63%) and Al Gore in 1992 (64%).
    hmmm your argument and the data just don't match, why is that?

  11. #9431
    Old God AntiFascistVoter's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Shitposting Agasint Fascists
    Posts
    10,561
    Quote Originally Posted by beanman12345 View Post
    Shame we just can't have any honesty from them.
    They show classic addict behavior of avoidance ... so honestly is doubtful.
    Government Affiliated Snark

  12. #9432
    The Unstoppable Force Ghostpanther's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    USA, Ohio
    Posts
    24,111
    Quote Originally Posted by Arch-Angel of Riots View Post
    Some claims being made in the linked video below:
    1. "The Kamala VP pick caused Biden to lose his lead over Trump in certain states."
    2. Kamala is hugely disliked among non-white voters, and it shows in the polls.



    Basically what I predicted, if true.
    Good video. But you do know it will get lambasted on here. Rasmussen for one, is not a pollster which is trusted by most on this forum. At least among the political interested crowd.

    The more I learn of Kamala, the more I feel she meets the meaning of "kamala" in Finnish. Horrible choice.
    " If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher.." - Abraham Lincoln
    The Constitution be never construed to authorize Congress to - prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms..” - Samuel Adams

  13. #9433
    Quote Originally Posted by Arch-Angel of Riots View Post
    You'll have to ask CNN why they spin a 21-point shift towards Trump among non-White voters, in their own poll, as Kamala being a good pick.
    Right, it's CNN's fault you linked their poll that destroys your narrative.

  14. #9434
    Quote Originally Posted by Milchshake View Post
    They show classic addict behavior of avoidance ... so honestly is doubtful.
    When proven wrong, Trumpsters will emulate their dear leader and double down. case in point ^

  15. #9435
    Quote Originally Posted by beanman12345 View Post
    When proven wrong, Trumpsters will emulate their dear leader and double down. case in point ^
    Biden is 4 points ahead in the latest poll.

    Perhaps you can explain to us how the candidate you've been shilling for, for months now, is only 4 points ahead of a man as terminally useless and visibly incompetent as Donald Trump.

    Because it looks to me Biden was selected because he was the only candidate available who would do enough corporate grovelling to be acceptable.

    Oh wait, scratch that, I don't fucking care what some genetically inbred fuckwit who loves sucks Biden's dick on a daily basis thinks.

  16. #9436
    Most of the recent polls I can see have Biden up 8-12 nationally. He's also within the margin of error or ahead in several battleground states that Trump won in 2016. That includes a few states that republicans shouldn't be in danger of losing, but are because of how terrible Trump has been.

    What a colossal fucking mistake by the GOP. If they had nominated Kasich we could potentially be looking at another 2-4 years of complete republican control with the presidency and congress. They would have had 6+ straight years of being able to do everything they wanted with no resistance.
    Last edited by Blur4stuff; 2020-08-18 at 11:07 PM.

  17. #9437
    Old God PhaelixWW's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Washington (né California)
    Posts
    10,621
    Quote Originally Posted by Arch-Angel of Riots View Post
    Some claims being made in the linked video below:
    1. "The Kamala VP pick caused Biden to lose his lead over Trump in certain states."
    2. Kamala is hugely disliked among non-white voters, and it shows in the polls.

    Basically what I predicted, if true.
    Sure, since you moved posts from one thread to another, I'll drop the reply here, as well.

    ABC Polling:

    ABC: 54% approve of Harris selection, including 1 in 4 Republicans: POLL
    More Americans approve than disapprove of Joe Biden's choice of Sen. Kamala Harris for the 2020 Democratic ticket by a 25-point margin, 54-29%, in a new ABC News/Washington Post poll.

    Approval of the pick ranges from 86-8% among Democrats to 25-55% among Republicans -- notable that one in four Republicans approves. It's 52-29% among independents, potential swing voters in presidential elections.

    See PDF for full results.

    Morning Consult Polling:




    YouGov Polling:








    And I'm sure the list goes on and on...
    R.I.P. Democracy


    "The difference between stupidity
    and genius is that genius has its limits."

    --Alexandre Dumas-fils

  18. #9438
    Burners with IQ's lower than trump say what? dance boy
    Last edited by beanman12345; 2020-08-18 at 11:27 PM.

  19. #9439
    Quote Originally Posted by frontwidth View Post
    Biden is 4 points ahead in the latest poll.

    Perhaps you can explain to us how the candidate you've been shilling for, for months now, is only 4 points ahead of a man as terminally useless and visibly incompetent as Donald Trump.

    Because it looks to me Biden was selected because he was the only candidate available who would do enough corporate grovelling to be acceptable.

    Oh wait, scratch that, I don't fucking care what some genetically inbred fuckwit who loves sucks Biden's dick on a daily basis thinks.
    That 4 point poll was an outlier of polls from the week. Seriously you guys are fucking dense. You ignore the 8-12 point lead polls and focus on the 4 point poll. Is GP uncharged of your polling talking points?

  20. #9440
    Quote Originally Posted by PhaelixWW View Post
    Sure, since you moved posts from one thread to another, I'll drop the reply here, as well.
    I'm guessing you are an American so I'll forgive you for being a bit of a retard.

    For the benefit of other Americans and non-Americans who are dumb as shit and need this stuff explained to them: virtually every metric ever devised by pollsters has no predictive value when applied to future tests. The exception is "who will you vote for"?, which is somewhat accurate-not really any more accurate than what is blindingly obvious to everyone, but somewhat accurate nonetheless.

    So if something happens like a dodgy authoritarian candidate that polled 2% in the primaries gets selected as VP then you look ONLY at the polls to see if there has been an impact. In Harris's case that is either "none" or "negative".

    Of course if you are the type of dribbling fuckwit who only posts partisan drivel then hell, go ahead and cherry-pick whatever data you want. No one will remember after tomorrow anyway. You might as well make it up.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •