I mean, I absolutely can, but...
The implication you're giving here is that the length and difficulty of the recovery is due to the policies overseeing said recovery. But that belies the reality of the nature of the recession to begin with, as well as presupposing that alternative policies would have been necessarily more effective.
But it's intellectual dishonesty to equate the 2008 recession which was caused by a massive financial sector crisis and the current economic downturn caused in large part by the pandemic and its handling in this country.
The nature of the 2008 recession is such that a full 1:1 recovery is not really meaningfully possible. With that much economic rebuilding required, the wealth was never going to perfectly go right back to where it was, unfortunately. Despite the fact that the recovery has been "done" for years, the lasting effect of the 2008 recession will be increased wealth inequality, but the view that this is the "fault" of those who oversaw the recovery is a myopic one.
The other harsh truth is that the policies that will combat wealth inequality are wholly on the side of Democratic lawmakers. Trump has proven, time and time again, to champion policies that will (and have) only increase what you view as the "recovery" of the 2008 recession, let alone the current pandemic economic reaction.
- - - Updated - - -
Uh, that's not calling Biden a savior; it's calling Trump the devil. Those are not the same thing at all.