Originally Posted by
eschatological
This is disingenuous doublespeak, or you're actually ignorant on how massive programs like SS are funded. They are funded by taxpayer contributions, and drawn on by taxpayers once they retire. It is designed, and supposed to be, self-funding.
Now, the boomer generation is A) a much larger generation than most other generations, which is literally why they're called the Boom Generation, and B) all held steady jobs and 40-50 year careers in which they contributed to SSI, while C) their parents, large chunks of which were decimated by two World Wars and the Great Depression didn't take much out of the pot.
Now, regular contributions to SSI by Milennials and Gen Z are down because of the gig economy, a lot of at-will, part-time, underemployed work, etc. At the same time, the largest generation is retiring and will be withdrawing from SSI's pot. This has literally been a looming crisis for 20 years.
Now, granted, it's not helped by regulatory funding mechanisms. It would be nice if money could just be slashed from, say, the military, and put into SSI, but usually Republicans (and even Dems) like to put that money to tax cuts (though the tax cuts tend to go to radically different portions of the population). Which would be fine if people saved that money to supplement their (now diminished) retirement, but people never do that with their tax cuts, because we live in the most consumerist, self-absorbed, greedy civilization that has yet walked the earth.
There's all sorts of funding mechanisms at play here. But generally, a program has to be self-solvent. "Utilities" like public education, actual utilities, infrastructure, etc, are funded by income tax. SS/Medicare is funded by separate taxes levied specifically for those programs.