Between that and the insistence that Joe Biden needs to catch up to the 21st century because he's failing to use 20th century advertising techniques, like yikes.But it's entirely possible that the person in question might not be lying about not seeing Biden's messaging.
Provided you consume nothing but curated media sources that are heavily dominated by right wing advertising, like...Ben Shapiro. Oops.
- - - Updated - - -
"I curated my search term and it didn't produce the results I like!" isn't a criticism of Biden's campaigning. Anyway...
No less than three major news outlets with articles covering his main policies, which you conveniently dismiss as "opinion pieces" because that doesn't service your a priori lede that Joe Biden is bad at campaigning.I googled for "Joe Biden's main campaign policies" and look what I've got:
Again, you are not making the case that the policies are hard to find - you are making the case that you need to be spoonfed information, and assuming that is generally reflective of the electorate at large.
The term for that mindset is Dunning-Kruger.
Originally Posted by Marjane Satrapi
More than that, it's like...
They just posted their own Google results (after curating the search term) and there is a BBC, a Vox, and a Politico article as the first results - none of which are opinion pieces or social media - and all listing his main campaign policies and priorities.
But yeah. "Hard to find" or something. Just like Bernie voters in South Carolina.
Originally Posted by Marjane Satrapi
I have to assume anyone who REALLY supported Bernie Sanders would just be embarrassed and/or upset at Rochana's showing here given how bad they're making the other supporters look. It's just cringe-inducing.
And now for something completely different...
Looks like Trump's ODNI just decided out of the blue to end House briefings on election security...for "reasons".
Schiff and Pelosi Call Cancellation of Election Security Briefings a 'Shocking Abdication' of 'Responsibility'
Yeah, I can't think of any good reason for this to happen, really. Especially during what is turning out to be one of the most attacked elections in ages.
https://twitter.com/jaketapper/statu...551433730?s=19BREAKING: A sr administration official tells CNN that the Office of the Director of National Intelligence has informed the House/Senate Select Committees on Intelligence that ODNI will no longer be briefing them on election security issues in person — instead: written updates.
So another WTF moment! Why would any administration do this when a) an election coming up and b) we have no doubt that foreign countries are try to sabatoge this election.
https://twitter.com/jaketapper/statu...229155336?s=193/ The House and Senate select Committees on Intelligence generally prefer in person briefings where they can ask questions, challenge assumptions and provide actual in person oversight.
YES! You know the other branch of government, who's needs to possibly make sure a President is not trying to steal an election
"You think you just fell out of a coconut tree?’
I don't know why anyone is wasting time with you considering you're a bad faith poster, but you realize that if Trump gets re-elected you're never going to get your vaunted 'revolution'? Because Trump will do everything he can to stay in power forever if he gets four more years.
"If you are ever asking yourself 'Is Trump lying or is he stupid?', the answer is most likely C: All of the Above" - Seth Meyers
There's already been previous claims to the effect that a Trump autocracy will spur people into action more quickly because it will be much worse than milquetoast neoliberalism, which is why you here the term "slow death" being tossed around in reference to a Biden presidency.
So, basic accelerationist nonsense.
Originally Posted by Marjane Satrapi
The argument about policy is crazy. This whole election boils down to the pandemic and the economy.
The questions that people should be asking is Labor Day going to be another super spreader event? Will the convergence of the flu season and Covid-19 be a disaster in the making? Will companies keep laying off their employees?
If the answers are yes, yes and yes. Biden has a very good chance of winning the presidency.
You know what I find funny? You're whining about how bad Biden is at campaigning and not articulating his vision (despite countless links providing you with the info you claim Biden isn't putting out) and you lot go on about how great Bernie was, but here's the thing: Bernie lost to the guy you claim is a bad campaigner.
So if Bernie lost to a guy you claim is terrible at campaigning, what makes you think he could have beaten Trump?
"If you are ever asking yourself 'Is Trump lying or is he stupid?', the answer is most likely C: All of the Above" - Seth Meyers
It's not licking wounds. You have clearly shown you were a bad faith poster in the past. Changed your name and avatar becasue you were repeatedly called out for being such. Now are showing your roots as a bad faith poster and being called out for what you are. If you fail to see the connection that 's on you.
Oh I don't think many here who are voting for Biden are doing so specifically because of policy. This isn't a policy election. The only reason policy is coming up now is because one person is either so dense they are forming their own gravitational field or they are sea-lioning.
- - - Updated - - -
Wimp Lo thinks losing is winning.
So have conservatives for the last 4 years. Sure Trump won, but the senate and house has done nothing but gain blue seats since the 2016 election. Trump hasn't really come through in any of his campaign policies. the dude is well below the Mendoza line on legal cases as President. And so on, and so on.