
Eh, you can walk and chew gum at the same time. Well, in Trump's case he struggles walking down ramps, but at least he can brag about this. It is one of his few accomplishments that is not appalling (At least with what we know so far, it is 50/50 we found out something horrific about it in a few weeks). All politicians brag about their wins. This isn't going to be one of the ones I fight him on.
The coronavirus response continues to be horrific, but that isn't really related to this.
- - - Updated - - -
Yep, said that when he first got killed. Bush should have killed him. If he didn't, Obama should have. Trump... I don't think Trump understood what he was doing, and I am not sure it was the right time and place, but I am not going to shed any tears over Soleimani's much deserved end.

How is that related, exactly?
It's like as if I go ahead and try to meme Obama's Nobel peace prize with drone bombings and destroying a country. Obama's Nobel peace prize was a joke of a century, IMO. Freshly elected guy gets a peace prize for being elected, then proceeds to destroy Lybia. /shrug
But you don't see me do that? Eh? Bygones be bygones and of the last 3-4 presidents US had, one of Trumps "achievements", if you will, is that he did not destroy a country during his presidency... yet...
His handling of COVID-19 was (edit) and is ATROCIOUS, there is no doubt about that. It will forever remain a huge and real stain on his "legacy". But that does not make him a "warmonger" some people try to paint him.
Last edited by Gaidax; 2020-09-11 at 07:36 PM.


Your feels about me using a past tense in a manner that triggered your response naturally.
I have no issue to oblige there, because I am all too ready to blame him and his administration for the failure in handling the pandemic. Past, present, future and all 16 possible combinations of these.
It's integrity thing.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...-cuts-unlikel/
Seems nothing will really change for the rest of the world, no matter who wins. But, oh!, we might even see more droning!
\
He does not have any.
Trump did it and it destroys our narrative of him being a warmonger who is after death and destruction. Heaven forbid we dare mention anything positive in context of Trump, that would break the Spiral of Silence rules.
Frankly, I already said it a year ago in some similar thread. Trump has PLENTY of failings to latch on, it won't make peoples' crowns fall if they mention an odd achievement as well in the sea of failures either.
That too, is integrity.

No, all the major ones I look at (BBC, Rueters, AP, Aljazeera, USA today, Vox) have it as a normalization deal. Fox has it as a peace deal, and I suspect other right wing outlets do, but it is actually a normalization deal. Bahrain was not at war with Israel, so it isn't a peace deal.
Here's some "right wing outlets" you missed. Semantics...is semantics.
Bahrain–Israel peace agreement
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bahrai...eace_agreement
Israel agrees peace deal with Bahrain as Donald Trump hails 'another historic breakthrough'
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/202...ace-agreement/
U.S. Brokers Peace Deal Between Israel And Bahrain
https://www.forbes.com/sites/danielc.../#5b4b220843ea
- - - Updated - - -
Agree 100%. Integrity appears to be in short supply in this forum...and I fear that it's a lost virtue.
Last edited by DocSavageFan; 2020-09-11 at 08:07 PM.
"Never get on the bad side of small minded people who have a little power." - Evelyn (Gifted)

Amusingly, the wikipedia article has a banner explaining they are probably going to change it to a normalization agreement, which is explained if you follow the links. Trump did call it a Peace Deal, which was picked up by a few media streams, but not by most. It is fair to say that some of them did though, I didn't poll all of them, so those are fair examples.
Anyway, agreed, semantics is semantics. I am not knocking this achievement, as you see earlier. I am cautious about it, because I trust Trump as much as I trust a wolverine not to bite, but on the face it looks like a good thing. The vast body of Trump's foreign policy is horrific however, both in relation to his conduct towards conflicts, and even more importantly diplomatically. Conflict has been described as the failure of diplomacy, and it that is true, Trump is sowing the seeds for a lot of major conflicts.
- - - Updated - - -
That one is irrelevant. I guarantee Trump had no advance knowledge of it. The military considers the GBU-43 a conventional weapon, as such it requires no special permissions outside of the normal CDE (Collateral Damage Estimate) requirements. It was really a matter of finding a target that justified it, and having one handy. It probably weighed into the decision that all the GBU-43s are reaching their expiration dates, and it is a matter of using it, recertifying it, or disabling it.
