"If you want to cut through the noise, it's this: the unifying theme is a desire for a sort of restorative authoritarianism, for a strong man to come in and forcibly put everything back "where it belongs." Everything else is aesthetic.
Like Flat Earth, there is a sympathetic nugget in the anxiety that the world has gotten too complex, that things are spinning out of control, but the Q analysis of the problem is that the fault lies with the people outlining the complexity. The purpose of cosmologies like Q, like Flat Earth, is to simplify the world. And I know that sounds ridiculous.
The irony here is that thisisn't all that far off base. Now, not this specific example, "the QAnon Map of Global Politics" is almost pure nonsense - but the shape of it isn't. If you were to map out the political landscape of the world it would look a lot like this, thousands of political entities, big and small, all with their own goals, values, and incentives navigating an equally complex series of conflicts, alliances, and rivalries in competition for power, fame, or limited resources.
So how is something like [the QAnon map] making the world simpler? Because it takes all this, the chaos of millions of individuals trying to reshape the world for good or ill in their own way, and turns it into a single entity. All the world's complexity, all the chaos, it's all the fault of one group. Not an ideology, not a worldview, not historical inertia, not anything so nebulous as the way we think about the world. A single, tangible, identifiable group with a written agenda.
These types of conspiratorial beliefs, for all their complex cosmologies, exist in opposition to structural challenges, and a lot of people get involved in them because they resent structural criticism.
Structural criticism poses that we are the way we are because of complicated forces, some intentional and many not that have compounded and morphed over generations. There's no plan, no template, and no goal, the world won't just magically morph into a better place as a function of its existence; we are responsible for confronting the past, fixing the present, and shaping the future.
QAnon, and not just QAnon, many people, many many people, want to believe that things are the way they are because someone has deliberately crafted it to be that way, that there is a natural order to the world, and we need to just 'trust the plan'. Climate scientists, trans and queer activists, womens' rights, reproductive autonomy, racial justice, protests against police brutality, protests against generational wealth inequality, and protests against the increasing transfer of the public good into the hands of corporations for privatization and exploitation - all of them are interlocking, systemic issues. These are inarguably disruptions of the status quo, confrontations of deep-rooted complexities that intersect the lives and futures of billions of people.
And it is that disruption, not the underlying injustices, not the underlying conflicts, that make QAnon anxious, that make QAnon feel like the world has gotten too complex. They don't want those complexities to exist, and by talking about them you make them exist. It's a form of magical thought. Talking about police brutality wills it into existence. A disruption of the status quo is seen as a disruption of the natural order. The problem they see is that no one has made those people shut up. That is what they want; someone to come in and make those people shut up, and go away, to put things back where they belong.
This philosophy is not unique to QAnon and is the lifeblood of all reactionary movements. And they are of course in conflict with the facts. Global warming, to pull one example, is real and an existential threat to civilization. That's just a fact. It wasn't willed into existence by people talking about it, it isn't overtuned leftists looking for patterns in clouds, it's the byproduct of dumping carbon dioxide into the atmosphere on an industrial scale for two hundred years. And there is a temptation to engage on that level, to confront all the material ways in which they are just wrong, and it largely does not work.
What's unique about QAnon is the degree to which it doesn't work, the degree to which the movement is immune to evidence. All reactionary movements are in tension with reality, a tension that eventually results in psychological crisis, and belief systems like QAnon are the endpoint to that crisis: the point at which reality itself becomes an enemy. Because ultimately it's not about facts, it's about power. QAnons are not otherwise empty vessels who believe one whacky thing. They have an agenda.
The reason they aren't more bothered by Q constantly getting things wrong, why they aren't more bothered by the extreme inconsistencies and outright contradictions, by the claims that are just materially wrong, is because it gives them power over others who are bound by something as weak and flimsy as reality. They claim to be against corruption while hanging their hopes on an openly corrupt man, and that naked hypocrisy is the point. They will effortlessly carve out an exception because it makes them exceptional. They engage in wild hypocrisy as an act of domination, adhering to something demonstrably untrue out of spite, because they believe that power belongs to those strong enough with the will to take it, and what greater sign of will than the ability to override truth?
Their will is a hammer that they are using to beat reality into a shape of their choosing, a simple world where reality is exactly what it looks like through their eyes, devoid of complexity, devoid of change, where they are right and their enemies are silent.
They are trying to build a Flat Earth.