1. #13801
    Quote Originally Posted by Ghostpanther View Post
    Fine if you do not care. But millions of owners of such do and should take this one as part of his policies which do violate the constitution according to the system which defines what is unconstitutional. Personal opinions until that decision is overruled, are only that.

    And for those who do know some history on the subject, the Parkland School shooter used 10 round magazines for his AR-15. And the single highest school shooting, the shooter used 2 handguns to kill over 30 students.
    Funny how you assholes ignore the well regulated militia part and what that means. Also, how you seem only to stand for one thing and let things like the most important ammendment, the 1st, get trampled on with nothing to say.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by jonnysensible View Post
    we promise not to get the canadians involved and burn the white house down either
    Hopefully someone gets trapped in there if it happens.

  2. #13802
    Quote Originally Posted by jonnysensible View Post
    we promise not to get the canadians involved and burn the white house down either
    Icing on the cake would be to Brenter, repeal 2A and then Brexit whilst handing the keys over to Canada.

  3. #13803
    Quote Originally Posted by SirBeef View Post
    Funny how you assholes ignore the well regulated militia part and what that means. Also, how you seem only to stand for one thing and let things like the most important ammendment, the 1st, get trampled on with nothing to say.
    They still don't understand the 1st amendment. They think boycotting a business is a violation of the 1st amendment, but that violently shutting down protests isn't.

  4. #13804
    Quote Originally Posted by Ghostpanther View Post
    A part of Biden's policy is to ban high capacity magazines for firearms. While this is certainly a topic for the Mega Gun Control thread, but since it is also tied to a candidate's political policies and thus is also appropriate for this thread in my opinion.

    For those who think the 10 round magazine limit is not a violation of the Second Amendment, the 9th circuit court thinks differently which ruled on the subject this year.

    https://freebeacon.com/latest-news/f...onstitutional/

    A federal appeals court ruled on Friday that California's ban on the possession of ammunition magazines that hold more than 10 rounds violates the Second Amendment.

    The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed U.S. District Judge Roger T. Benitez's 2019 ruling against the ban on magazines holding more than 10 rounds. The 2-1 decision asserted the magazine ban, which made both future sales of affected magazines and the possession of those already legally purchased punishable by up to a year in jail, was incompatible with Supreme Court precedent on gun-rights guarantees in the U.S. Constitution. Judge Kenneth Lee, joined by Judge Connie Callahan, said the ban violated Californians' right to self-defense.


    So it is a violation until the Supreme Court rules against this decision. If they do.
    So frikin disingenuous. People of your ilk are crying about activist judges and how need "true" Constitution judge.

    No where does 2nd Amendment talk about this.

    But, but, but....

    Yeah its interpreting the 2nd Amendment and nothing else. So its activism. Plain and simple.
    "Buh dah DEMS"

  5. #13805
    Banned cubby's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    the Quiet Room
    Posts
    35,050
    Quote Originally Posted by Ghostpanther View Post
    Fine if you do not care. But millions of owners of such do and should take this one as part of his policies which do violate the constitution according to the system which defines what is unconstitutional. Personal opinions until that decision is overruled, are only that.

    And for those who do know some history on the subject, the Parkland School shooter used 10 round magazines for his AR-15. And the single highest school shooting, the shooter used 2 handguns to kill over 30 students.
    Can you please move this to the Mega Gun thread? That's what it's for.

  6. #13806
    Quote Originally Posted by Ghostpanther View Post
    Fine if you do not care. But millions of owners of such do and should take this one as part of his policies which do violate the constitution according to the system which defines what is unconstitutional. Personal opinions until that decision is overruled, are only that.

    And for those who do know some history on the subject, the Parkland School shooter used 10 round magazines for his AR-15. And the single highest school shooting, the shooter used 2 handguns to kill over 30 students.
    Sorry, but if you need more than 10 shots for ANYTHING, you need to learn to fucking shoot.

    Who am I to believe, you or the cops? Considering they recovered 8 30 to 40 round magazines at the Parkland shooting. https://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/fl...212-story.html

    And the only morons that are pushing that the Parkland shooter only had 10 round magazines, are the Heritage foundation, National Review, and other right wing sources.

    He shot over 100 rounds, and if he only had 8 magazines at 10 rounds apiece, that is still 20 rounds short.

  7. #13807
    Quote Originally Posted by cubby View Post
    Can you please move this to the Mega Gun thread? That's what it's for.
    For others. Report for derailing and move on. I fell for it and honestly we should all drop it. Nothing to do about General Election.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Trump refuses to commit to peaceful transition of power should he lose the election in November

    Here we go folks. Remember this is Trump not playing his 10th dimensional chess of not telling people his plans. He wants to do this.

    Someone also stated this should be Biden's first attack in debate if he is willing to accept a peaceful transition if defeated in November. Again no 10th dimensional chess, any candidate should admit this. This is our democracy. A peaceful transition to power.
    "Buh dah DEMS"

  8. #13808
    https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2020/09/...kamala-harris/

    Taking particular delight that notable homophobe Mike Pence is being played by gay, married former candidate Pete Buttigieg during Harris's debate prep.

    I doubt mother would approve.

  9. #13809
    Void Lord Felya's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    the other
    Posts
    58,334
    Quote Originally Posted by Edge- View Post
    https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2020/09/...kamala-harris/

    Taking particular delight that notable homophobe Mike Pence is being played by gay, married former candidate Pete Buttigieg during Harris's debate prep.

    I doubt mother would approve.
    Uhm... I’m more interested in Trump debate prep... is it a call with Alex Jones or Q?
    Folly and fakery have always been with us... but it has never before been as dangerous as it is now, never in history have we been able to afford it less. - Isaac Asimov
    Every damn thing you do in this life, you pay for. - Edith Piaf
    The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. - Orwell
    No amount of belief makes something a fact. - James Randi

  10. #13810
    Quote Originally Posted by Felya View Post
    Uhm... I’m more interested in Trump debate prep... is it a call with Alex Jones or Q?
    Probably hire that Obama stand-in again, because he probably thinks that that will help him in this situation again.

  11. #13811
    Quote Originally Posted by Felya View Post
    Uhm... I’m more interested in Trump debate prep... is it a call with Alex Jones or Q?
    Trump has vowed that he doesn't need to prepare for the debates.

    Seriously. This is a thing.

  12. #13812
    Quote Originally Posted by Felya View Post
    Uhm... I’m more interested in Trump debate prep... is it a call with Alex Jones or Q?
    If it's anything like 2016, it'll be watching lots of videos of Biden "looking for weaknesses" with no actual prep.

  13. #13813
    Quote Originally Posted by Ghostpanther View Post
    A part of Biden's policy is to ban high capacity magazines for firearms. While this is certainly a topic for the Mega Gun Control thread, but since it is also tied to a candidate's political policies and thus is also appropriate for this thread in my opinion.

    For those who think the 10 round magazine limit is not a violation of the Second Amendment, the 9th circuit court thinks differently which ruled on the subject this year.

    https://freebeacon.com/latest-news/f...onstitutional/

    A federal appeals court ruled on Friday that California's ban on the possession of ammunition magazines that hold more than 10 rounds violates the Second Amendment.

    The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed U.S. District Judge Roger T. Benitez's 2019 ruling against the ban on magazines holding more than 10 rounds. The 2-1 decision asserted the magazine ban, which made both future sales of affected magazines and the possession of those already legally purchased punishable by up to a year in jail, was incompatible with Supreme Court precedent on gun-rights guarantees in the U.S. Constitution. Judge Kenneth Lee, joined by Judge Connie Callahan, said the ban violated Californians' right to self-defense.


    So it is a violation until the Supreme Court rules against this decision. If they do.
    Hey dude, Dotard Tang just said he wont do a peaceful transfer of power, and fully intends to steal the election.
    So you support an actual fascist?
    Forgive my english, as i'm not a native speaker



  14. #13814
    this is nuts lol https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1308895705860321283

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Thepersona View Post
    Hey dude, Dotard Tang just said he wont do a peaceful transfer of power, and fully intends to steal the election.
    So you support an actual fascist?
    ^

    out of the horses mouth

  15. #13815
    Quote Originally Posted by eschatological View Post
    Trump has vowed that he doesn't need to prepare for the debates.

    Seriously. This is a thing.
    he really doesn't, his strategy is just constantly try to talk over his opponent and spew bullshit, don't need much practice there.

  16. #13816
    So all of you Tumpetees, when the clock inevitably swings the other way, where will you be? Handcuffed, On the second nuremberg trials? Or escaping to Argentina/Brazil/Chile?
    Forgive my english, as i'm not a native speaker



  17. #13817
    Quote Originally Posted by Thepersona View Post
    Hey dude, Dotard Tang just said he wont do a peaceful transfer of power, and fully intends to steal the election.
    So you support an actual fascist?
    Trumpers have always supported fascism. It's just more blatantly obvious these days.

  18. #13818
    Quote Originally Posted by Thepersona View Post
    So all of you Tumpetees, when the clock inevitably swings the other way, where will you be? Handcuffed, On the second nuremberg trials? Or escaping to Argentina/Brazil/Chile?
    God. If we had nuremberg trials for all these Trump pieces of shat, I'd be really happy. But I doubt it'll happen.

  19. #13819
    On one hand, I feel less anxiety when I zone out from the current state of politics and this election. Republican hypocrisy at the clearest focus its been in decades, openly supported by their voters. Trump stating that he has every intention of using a SC majority to fuck with an election. Trump's campaign legal advisors planning to end-run around the results, and replace electors in Republican states that go blue with loyal Republicans who will elect Trump regardless.

    But then I remember, oh wait, even if my brain can relax by not thinking about it, it's still going to catch up eventually because Republicans won't fucking fix healthcare. I wouldn't mind our fascist overlords if they would at least fucking do something tangible for Americans.

    Christ. We need to get this election over with, because seeing the once-reasonable conservatives on here turn a new level of crazy every other week is draining. Whether Biden wins or loses, I have a feeling we're going to hit rock bottom in November one way or another.

  20. #13820
    Merely a Setback PACOX's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    ██████
    Posts
    27,322
    Yeah if people tho k were suddenly going back to 2010 if Biden wins are smoking the good stuff. This country is in an uphill battle no matter who wins. The winner of 2020 just determines how far to the right the difficulty slider is. Either way its going to be on 'fucked' or 'what the actual fuck'.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •