1. #17501
    Void Lord Elegiac's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Aelia Capitolina
    Posts
    59,354
    Quote Originally Posted by breadisfunny View Post
    bit off topic but what kind of car is the one in front? it looks cool.
    It's a golf cart modded to look like a vintage car, I believe.

    I mean it goes to show you how rich and out of touch these people are that so many of them own golf carts but go figure.
    Quote Originally Posted by Marjane Satrapi
    The world is not divided between East and West. You are American, I am Iranian, we don't know each other, but we talk and understand each other perfectly. The difference between you and your government is much bigger than the difference between you and me. And the difference between me and my government is much bigger than the difference between me and you. And our governments are very much the same.

  2. #17502
    Quote Originally Posted by Felya View Post

    Could you try that again?
    So flustered in his talking points can't slow his roll to post accurately?

    They can't stop for a second changing and weaving their way through their bullshit piled on the ground to add another pile of bullshit



    https://www.brookings.edu/blog/fixgo...me-court-vote/


    given the lack of any “long-standing tradition” but anticipating the possibility of an election-year vacancy, McConnell fabricated a different history to justify treating a Trump nominee differently from Obama’s. He argued that “[y]ou have to go back to … 1880s to find the last time … a Senate of a different party from the president filled a Supreme Court vacancy created in the middle of a presidential election. That was entirely the precedent.”


    When that anticipation became reality with the death of Justice Ginsburg, he offered a slightly different excuse: “Since the 1880s, no Senate has confirmed an opposite-party president’s Supreme Court nominee in a presidential election year”. A National Review article claimed a norm: “when their party controls the Senate, presidents get to fill Supreme Court vacancies . . . [but] when the opposite party controls the Senate, the Senate gets to block Supreme Court nominees . . .”.
    Buh Byeeeeeeeeeeee !!

  3. #17503
    I Don't Work Here Endus's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Ottawa, ON
    Posts
    79,235
    Quote Originally Posted by postman1782 View Post
    If the Republicans steal this seat like they did the last one, then I am all for pushing the courts to 15 or more.
    Expand the court to 13/15 seats, establish Federal law mandating that SCOTUS have said number of members. Establish federal law that establishes a requirement that the court partisan distribution be no greater than 50%+1 seat; a 13-seat SCOTUS would be legally obliged to have no more than 7 representatives from a given party, and a 15-seat court no more than 8. Establish federal law that no more than one seat can be empty and the Court still sit, preventing any party from leaving seats open rather than fill them to maintain an advantage. Establish a code of conduct that mandates a separation of Church and State within the courts.

    Ideally, I'd say a federal law to prevent any justice, at any level, from any partisan standing or membership whatsoever, currently or historically. But that's never gonna happen, in the USA.


  4. #17504
    Quote Originally Posted by Endus View Post
    Expand the court to 13/15 seats, establish Federal law mandating that SCOTUS have said number of members. Establish federal law that establishes a requirement that the court partisan distribution be no greater than 50%+1 seat; a 13-seat SCOTUS would be legally obliged to have no more than 7 representatives from a given party, and a 15-seat court no more than 8. Establish federal law that no more than one seat can be empty and the Court still sit, preventing any party from leaving seats open rather than fill them to maintain an advantage. Establish a code of conduct that mandates a separation of Church and State within the courts.

    Ideally, I'd say a federal law to prevent any justice, at any level, from any partisan standing or membership whatsoever, currently or historically. But that's never gonna happen, in the USA.
    I would also establish a law that says when they can refuse to hold hearings or stop the slamming through of a seat. Like, You can't confirm a judge, in an election year, after the primary process has been chosen, or started? Instead of having some shitgibbon like McConnell change his mind and flip flop.

  5. #17505
    The Undying
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    the Quiet Room
    Posts
    34,554
    Quote Originally Posted by postman1782 View Post
    If the Republicans steal this seat like they did the last one, then I am all for pushing the courts to 15 or more.
    There is actually a very good policy argument going around for expanding the court significantly - 19-27 seats. The reasoning is that each seat opening of SCOTUS has become so divisive that it makes a process that shouldn't be any more political than necessary into something that couldn't be more political if we tried. By expanding the court to a large number - 27 seats is actually the preferred amount - you remove most of the politicization for when a seat opens. With 9 seats, if a Justice dies or retires, the world goes insane. With 27, if three die or retire, who the fuck cares (relatively speaking).

  6. #17506
    Void Lord Elegiac's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Aelia Capitolina
    Posts
    59,354
    Quote Originally Posted by Marjane Satrapi
    The world is not divided between East and West. You are American, I am Iranian, we don't know each other, but we talk and understand each other perfectly. The difference between you and your government is much bigger than the difference between you and me. And the difference between me and my government is much bigger than the difference between me and you. And our governments are very much the same.

  7. #17507
    The Undying Cthulhu 2020's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Rigging your election
    Posts
    36,856
    Quote Originally Posted by Ghostpanther View Post
    Recently, Biden when asked about packing the Supreme Court, besides he would not answer the question directly, stated "never before in history has a vacant seat on the Supreme Court been selected for the seat in a election year"..which is a fabrication of his making....

    https://newstalk1130.iheart.com/feat...lection-years/

    So too is nominating and confirming a Justice before the election. In fact, throughout American history, there have been 16 U.S. Supreme Court vacancies in presidential election years. 12 justices have been nominated in an election year and confirmed before the presidential election, while only one was nominated but failed to win confirmation in the Senate.

    And for those who think it has not happened in the 1900's....

    In March of 1912, Republican President William Howard Taft nominated Mahlon Pitney to succeed the deceased John Harlan. The Republican-controlled Senate confirmed him overwhelmingly just five days later.

    Four years after that, Democratic President Woodrow Wilson made two Supreme Court nominations before the presidential election of 1916: Louis Brandeis and John Clarke. The Democrat-controlled Senate confirmed both; even voting unanimously for Clarke just ten days after his nomination!

    In February of 1932, the Republican-controlled Senate confirmed Republican President Herbert Hoover’s nomination of Benjamin Cardozo on a voice vote. Eight years later, it also used a voice vote to confirm Democrat Franklin Roosevelt’s selection of Frank Murphy.

    In September of 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower learned that Justice Sherman Minton was planning to retire the following month. On October 16, the day after Minton left office and just 52 days before Eisenhower stood for re-election, he made a recess appointment to name William Brennan to the Court. When the Senate returned to session in early 1957, it voted to confirm Brennan’s nomination.
    RBG's dying wish to wait until after the election to have the seat filled. Why do Republicans want to disrespect and piss on the grave of such a brave woman?
    2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
    2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"

  8. #17508
    Quote Originally Posted by Elegiac View Post
    It's a golf cart modded to look like a vintage car, I believe.

    I mean it goes to show you how rich and out of touch these people are that so many of them own golf carts but go figure.
    Actually, the golf carts are the main mode of transport in the Villages. The Villages is set up for it. They pretty much do all their running around in golf carts, like grocery shopping, going out, etc.
    "When Facism comes to America, it will be wrapped in a flag and carrying a cross." - Unknown

  9. #17509
    Quote Originally Posted by Milchshake View Post

    Does Belgium really need 2 Green parties?
    What? You do know there's a French and Dutch speaking part with their own government right? It has nothing to do with factionalism but with the constitutional structure of this country.

    Educate yourself before you run your mouth about a topic you clearly don't know anything about.

  10. #17510
    Old God Captain N's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    New Resident of Emerald City
    Posts
    10,959
    Quote Originally Posted by Cthulhu 2020 View Post
    RBG's dying wish to wait until after the election to have the seat filled. Why do Republicans want to disrespect and piss on the grave of such a brave woman?
    Because she's a woman....and a liberal.
    “You're not to be so blind with patriotism that you can't face reality. Wrong is wrong, no matter who does it or says it.”― Malcolm X

    I watch them fight and die in the name of freedom. They speak of liberty and justice, but for whom? -Ratonhnhaké:ton (Connor Kenway)

  11. #17511
    Void Lord Elegiac's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Aelia Capitolina
    Posts
    59,354
    Quote Originally Posted by Cthulhu 2020 View Post
    RBG's dying wish to wait until after the election to have the seat filled. Why do Republicans want to disrespect and piss on the grave of such a brave woman?
    Also one would think an ostensibly godfearing group of people would take the hint when their celebration of this course of action gets struck by plague.
    Quote Originally Posted by Marjane Satrapi
    The world is not divided between East and West. You are American, I am Iranian, we don't know each other, but we talk and understand each other perfectly. The difference between you and your government is much bigger than the difference between you and me. And the difference between me and my government is much bigger than the difference between me and you. And our governments are very much the same.

  12. #17512
    The Undying Cthulhu 2020's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Rigging your election
    Posts
    36,856
    Quote Originally Posted by Elegiac View Post
    I can't wait for the media to ask Trump to reject the endorsement and denounce the Taliban.

    "Well you see, there are some very fine people, very fine."
    2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
    2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"

  13. #17513
    Void Lord Elegiac's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Aelia Capitolina
    Posts
    59,354
    Quote Originally Posted by Cthulhu 2020 View Post
    I can't wait for the media to ask Trump to reject the endorsement and denounce the Taliban.

    "Well you see, there are some very fine people, very fine."
    Or: "I can't say I'm familiar with them."
    Quote Originally Posted by Marjane Satrapi
    The world is not divided between East and West. You are American, I am Iranian, we don't know each other, but we talk and understand each other perfectly. The difference between you and your government is much bigger than the difference between you and me. And the difference between me and my government is much bigger than the difference between me and you. And our governments are very much the same.

  14. #17514
    Quote Originally Posted by Elegiac View Post
    Or: "I can't say I'm familiar with them."
    "He's a very fine man. A good man. I remember he used to come tally me bananas..."

  15. #17515
    Quote Originally Posted by Benggaul View Post
    "He's a very fine man. A good man. I remember he used to come tally me bananas..."
    "Why shouldn't they endorse me? I'm good for business. I stopped the war. Something the radical Democrats could never do."

  16. #17516
    I am Murloc! Noxx79's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Kansas. Yes, THAT Kansas.
    Posts
    5,474
    Quote Originally Posted by Ghostpanther View Post
    Recently, Biden when asked about packing the Supreme Court, besides he would not answer the question directly, stated "never before in history has a vacant seat on the Supreme Court been selected for the seat in a election year"..which is a fabrication of his making....

    https://newstalk1130.iheart.com/feat...lection-years/

    So too is nominating and confirming a Justice before the election. In fact, throughout American history, there have been 16 U.S. Supreme Court vacancies in presidential election years. 12 justices have been nominated in an election year and confirmed before the presidential election, while only one was nominated but failed to win confirmation in the Senate.

    And for those who think it has not happened in the 1900's....

    In March of 1912, Republican President William Howard Taft nominated Mahlon Pitney to succeed the deceased John Harlan. The Republican-controlled Senate confirmed him overwhelmingly just five days later.

    Four years after that, Democratic President Woodrow Wilson made two Supreme Court nominations before the presidential election of 1916: Louis Brandeis and John Clarke. The Democrat-controlled Senate confirmed both; even voting unanimously for Clarke just ten days after his nomination!

    In February of 1932, the Republican-controlled Senate confirmed Republican President Herbert Hoover’s nomination of Benjamin Cardozo on a voice vote. Eight years later, it also used a voice vote to confirm Democrat Franklin Roosevelt’s selection of Frank Murphy.

    In September of 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower learned that Justice Sherman Minton was planning to retire the following month. On October 16, the day after Minton left office and just 52 days before Eisenhower stood for re-election, he made a recess appointment to name William Brennan to the Court. When the Senate returned to session in early 1957, it voted to confirm Brennan’s nomination.
    An abortion likely saved trumps life.

  17. #17517
    Over 9000! zealo's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    9,519
    Quote Originally Posted by Elegiac View Post
    That moment when terrorists the US has been fighting for 19 years in Afghanistan endorses one of the candidates in a US election.

  18. #17518
    Quote Originally Posted by zealo View Post
    That moment when terrorists the US has been fighting for 19 years in Afghanistan endorses one of the candidates in a US election.
    The hilarity of the endorsement aside, haven't they made strides to becoming a legitimate political entity in the region? Or am I thinking of another group?

  19. #17519
    Quote Originally Posted by Noxx79 View Post
    An abortion likely saved trumps life.
    You think ghostpanther cares?

    There is no supposed belief he holds that he won't instantiously throw in a dumpster if it becomes the slightest bit inconvenient to supporting Trump / republicans.

    His beliefs only apply to democrats.
    Quote Originally Posted by Redtower View Post
    I don't think I ever hide the fact I was a national socialist. The fact I am a German one is what technically makes me a nazi
    Quote Originally Posted by Hooked View Post
    You haven't seen nothing yet, we trumpsters will definitely be getting some cool uniforms soon I hope.

  20. #17520
    I'm a long-time lurker but not really an active poster, so I don't know who to direct this at, but are there any Trump supporters out there willing to actually answer this question: during the first debate, the Trump family refused to wear masks. Why do they believe the rules don't apply to them?

    Ever since watching the Chris Wallace interview on Fox News I've yet to see any direct answer to this question.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •