It's not nothing. One sec.
- - - Updated - - -
Yes, and it's not good.
The reassignments mean that the most conservative justices on SCOTUS are now in charge, individually, of hearing and granting emergency applications - including injunctions. After an injunction is addressed by the individual Justice, the Court reviews Cert requests. It requires four justices voting "yes" to hear a case.The Supreme Court helpfully explains, at length, why the justices’ circuit assignments matter. Petitioners will submit emergency applications to an individual justice. A recent example? Pennsylvania Republicans (in the Third Circuit) submitted an emergency application with Justice Samuel Alito, asking for an injunction in an election-related case. Alito responded by granting the request himself 34 to the rest of the Supreme Court.
You may have noticed as well that petitions for a writ of certiorari (a petition for SCOTUS to hear a case) note which circuit the petition is coming from: On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the _____ Circuit.
“[F]our of the nine Justices must vote to accept a case. Five of the nine Justices must vote in order to grant a stay, e.g., a stay of execution in a death penalty case,” the high court’s rules note. “Under certain instances, one Justice may grant a stay pending review by the entire Court.”
This takes all the state-based voting lawsuits and puts them in the federal arena. And even if the District Court tosses the case out, it can be appealed, and even if the Circuit Courts toss it out, it can be appealed. And now Trump's SCOTUS cronies are in charge of granting injunctions.
One more reason why Trump's THREE SCOTUS nominees are so important and horrific.