They'll do the trilogy. I think up to WotLK... cannot imagine many people clamouring form Classic Cataclysm though :P
They'll do the trilogy. I think up to WotLK... cannot imagine many people clamouring form Classic Cataclysm though :P
Last edited by Orby; 2020-05-13 at 12:56 PM.
Its probably worth noting that all content included in this post will no longer be challenging or really relevant in that sense to modern wow players who have continued to progress. So I'm not sure challenging PvE content will ever be the draw for classic servers unless they start to pump them out and get to more recent expansions quickly. Its really about nostalgia, community and pace. The hardcore or experienced group of players on each of these servers will pretty much be rolling most content upon release. I think 25hc lk would perhaps be cool to watch without the raidwide buff but I suspect people will just stack classes and gear specifically for that and it'll turn out to be a lot easier than we thought back then when it was all new and unexpected
Last edited by Erolian; 2020-05-13 at 01:14 PM.
Yeah you sort of are wrong... If someone doesn't want to play vanilla anymore they aren't going to just stick around with vanilla and go "Well this is all I got so I guess I'll keep playing"... they will just quit. Also, if someone wants to play vanilla forever and this is the game they want to stick with, they will stick with vanilla regardless of whats released.
This isn't splintering the community, this is opening up communities for people who might otherwise not be playing wow.
See if you made two classic wows and they were both vanilla and lets just say one had alliance shamans and horde paladins and the other didn't. THIS would be splintering the community. Because both are the same version of the same game but just slightly different. If you had just one server then they would all likely just stick to that one. When you are talking about almost completely separate games then this is no longer the case.
NGL I am excited for wotlk just because of pvp, but I will for SURE be raiding ulduar if I can get into a group. HOW YOU NOT EXCITED FOR ULDUAR BRO WTF
- - - Updated - - -
I mean... you could flex pretty fuckin hard as a rogue with glaives on an amani war bear and glad title...
I guess that true.. But you would be surprised how many people didnt even know what a glad title were.. I literally cant even tell you how many times in BC I was chilling on my merciless nether drake while rocking a glad title.. and got the whisper "how you get that"? Sure people were amazed by the mount.. But there was no recognition amongst them.. Most of the population didnt even know how it was obtained..
Those were the glory days though.. Where things you obtained through pvp werent also obtainable through pve. I was so disappointed when they took the glad drake in wotlk and reskinned it nearly identical and made it a reward form the icc meta achiev.. sad sad days.
BOO HOO awesome looking mount that we cant get cause we dont know how pvp werk. Okay guys, look, get a few relatively achievs in ICC and well give you the mount.. Thats fair right?
Last edited by Recovery; 2020-05-13 at 03:29 PM.
Oh dont get me wrong ICC was fucking amazing. I actually love the time locked, death limit thing they had there. It made for really fun progression.
- - - Updated - - -
I loved the gunship fight but honestly I don't think it has anything on Ulduar fights. Christ leviathan alone, the first boss entering the fucking place, was SO much fucking fun.
I agree with the posters above. ICC was a hell of a raid, one of the best I've ever seen. Can't wait to play it again.
so i take it u werent a WOTLK fan....
Oh, they will do TBC and WOTLK, because that's what the fans want (and will pay for).
We all know they need easy projects for guaranteed profit after failure known as Warcraft 3: Refunded.
On a side note, I've already backed up my original Diablo 2 game and installer, in case they pull another dumb stunt.
Maybe because Aizen is pledging for Angrydave to not get the version of WoW he (and many others) wants, rather than the other way around? Just saying.
I mean heck, if by some twist of fate there was a massive movement demanding to play Cataclysm after WotLK comes out, I'm pretty sure Blizzard would comply. And rightfully so. If there's one thing the pservers taught Blizz is that you can't stop people from playing what they like
Last edited by Zarator8; 2020-05-17 at 04:20 PM.
Naturally, yes. Though I kind of doubt it will go past TBC Classic anyways. It will probably already have much lower player numbers than Vanilla Classic. I mean heck, tons of guilds in Vanilla Classic are already struggling with their rosters because people lost their interest. Including the one I'm in.
That post contains so much wrong it's painful to read.
Please read the actual thread and some of the great points and facts people have provided, not least of which are the following takeaways:
- wrath private servers are historically far far more popular than vanilla and tbc ones put together, despite all 3 early games (and later ones too) being offered. It makes literally no sense whatsoever not to capitalise on that from a business AND fan service perspective.
- vanilla servers can be condensed down if it comes to it. We currently have what? Over 30 per region?
- many people who want to play classic TBC or wrath have absolutely zero interest in classic vanilla, so those kinds of people aren't even playing classic anyway. I am waiting for TBC onwards because I find classic uninteresting. Many people only play classic because they hope for TBC and the same will apply for wrath. These people constitute an audience for TBC and wrath who won't detract from the vanilla playerbase.... Because they're not playing it to begin with...
- people will lose interest in classic over time regardless, if they haven't already. That's not going to be the fault of them re-introducing TBC or wrath. The difference is with TBC and wrath on the table, they might be retained in some capacity, as opposed to lost as customers. Some are only playing classic because they hope to advance to TBC, and the same logic will apply to wrath. They'll just quit if it hits a wall. (The number of people who will want to progress beyond that to Cata will be much much more limited).
- I highly doubt TBC classic will have lower average player numbers. It'll possibly have a smaller initial surge, because classic was an oddity as most players started playing on the tbc and wrath era, but by extension this means most players would play TBC and wrath in a heartbeat over vanilla. Those are widely considered the 2 most beloved versions of WoW for a reason.
- even if everything else I wrote is false (which it isn't) it would still be worth it for blizzard to do wrath again because I shit you not, the surge of resubs to work required ratio is way too good to pass up. It's easy money, easy popularity, and it can be release-timed to plug lulls in retail. They're still a business. Their goal is easy money.
- a lot of vanilla guilds might also be struggling with their rosters because, umm, raids require a colossal 40 players? That's a noteworthy point, considering BC and wrath consecutively allowed smaller raid sizes to increase accessibility. Fielding enough players was an issue even back in actual vanilla. Vanilla is a logistical nightmare by modern standards.
Last edited by Will; 2020-05-19 at 09:55 AM.